Skip to content

PROFEMUR® PRTL0025Recalls & reported problems

Microport Orthopedics Inc. · PROFEMUR® TL STEM SZ 5 · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI M684PRTL00251), received between Mar 10, 2020 and Mar 7, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Corroded” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Corroded1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Material Discolored1
  • Mechanical Problem1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Pain5
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1
  • Metal Related Pathology1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 7, 2025Corroded; Corroded

    ALLEGEDLY, DOCTOR RECOMMENDED THE REVISION SURGERY AFTER PLAINTIFF PRESENTED WITH PROGRESSIVE RIGHT HIP PAIN, ELEVATED ION LEVELS, METALLOSIS CHANGES AROUND THE FEMORAL NECK AND SURROUNDING SOFT TISSUES AROUND THE PROXIMAL FEMUR, ADVERSE LOCAL TISSUE REACTION AND LACK OF MOBILITY. THE REVISION WAS NECESSARY BECAUSE THE DEVICE FAILED DUE TO CORROSION AT THE NECK-STEM JUNCTION OF THE DEVICE. PRODUCTS NOT SPECIFIED THEY WERE REVISED: PRODUCT ID: DBFPGD52 DYNASTY® BF SHELL PRIMARY 52MM GROUP D, LOT: 1684715, QTY:1.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Pain

    MAUDE report 21548583 ↗
  • InjuryMay 12, 2022Material Discolored

    ALLEGEDLY, THE PATIENT HAS BEEN SUFFERING MODERATE PAIN, AND THE IMPLANTS WERE REVISED FOR METALLOSIS, ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON. THE MODULAR NECK TRUNION (FITTING IN TO THE STEM POCKET) WAS NOTICEABLY "BLACKENED". ALL IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED, AND REPLACED WITH A THR CEMENT SPACER. UNFORTUNATELY IT WASN'T POSSIBLE TO REMOVE THE LINER FROM THE PROCOTYL L SHELL, SO I CANT PROVIDE THE LOT NUMBER FOR THE BIOLOX LINER.

    Patient problems: Metal Related Pathology; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 14380060 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 15, 2022Mechanical Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Mechanical Problem; Loss of Osseointegration

    ALLEGEDLY, THE PATIENT WAS COMPLAINING OF PAIN AND CRP LEVELS WERE HIGH, SO WE SUSPECTED INFECTION AND PLANNED TO REMOVE THE TL, BUT AS IT TURNED OUT, THERE WAS NO INFECTION IN THE TEST RESULTS. DURING THE OP, THE NECK COULD NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE STEM NO MATTER WHAT I DID, AND AS A RESULT, THE ENTIRE STEM WAS REMOVED. THE AFFECTED AREA WAS CLEAN AND THERE WAS NO LOOSENING ON THE CUP SIDE. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF BONE ON GROWTH AT THE PROXIMAL PLASMAPHERESIS COATING. (B)(4).

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 13534768 ↗
  • InjuryNov 8, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    SAE# (B)(4). ALLEGEDLY, THE PATIENT STARTED HAVING LT HIP PAIN 3 WEEKS AFTER SURGERY. MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO RELIEF THE PAIN WITH CORTICOSTEROID INJECTIONS INTRA-ARTICULAR WITH NO SUCCESS. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A SURGICAL INTERVENTION FOR RELEASE OF THE PSOAS TENDON ON (B)(6) 2018. THE PAIN AND WEAKNESS IN THE LEFT THIGH IS STILL PERSISTENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM CLINICAL RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2021 CONFIRMING THAT COMPONENTS WERE NOT REVISED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12771850 ↗
  • InjuryOct 12, 2021Use of Device Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Use of Device Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ALLEGEDLY, THE PATIENT DISLOCATED A FEW DAYS AFTER THE ORIGINAL SURGERY, THIS WAS REDUCED AND THE PATIENT WAS OK FOR ABOUT 10 DAYS. BEFORE THERE WAS A FURTHER DISLOCATION. THE SURGEON FELT THAT THE REASON FOR THE DISLOCATION WAS A LACK OF TENSION, OR OFFSET. THIS WAS RESOLVED WITH A LONGER NECK, CREATING MORE OFFSET. THE OPERATION WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, THE PATIENT HAS SINCE BEEN DISCHARGED FROM HOSPITAL. THE SURGEON PUTS THIS DOWN TO SURGEON ERROR.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 12615224 ↗
  • InjuryMar 10, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    ALLEGEDLY, SUBJECT WAS SEEN IN EMERGENCY ROOM WITH RIGHT HIP PAIN FOR 2 WEEKS, CRUNCHING WITH MOTION AND DIFFICULTY AMBULATING. LINER FRACTURE WAS CONFIRMED BY X RAY AND CT OF THE HIP. SUBJECT HAD A REVISION AND REMOVAL OF THE ORIGINAL ACETABULAR, LINER, MODULAR NECK AND FEMORAL HEAD AND WAS DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2015.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 9813778 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Uncemented devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.