CPR-D PADZRecalls & reported problems across all models
Zoll Medical Corporation · 2 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 46
- Deaths reported
- 2
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls
- 0
We found 2 models of CPR-D PADZ by Zoll Medical Corporation in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 46 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Aug 24, 2015 and Aug 28, 2026 — classified as 2 deaths, 1 injury, 43 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unable to Obtain Readings” (21 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported CPR-D PADZ problems
Device problems
- Unable to Obtain Readings21
- Failure of Device to Self-Test8
- Patient Device Interaction Problem7
- Accessory Incompatible3
- Component or Accessory Incompatibility1
- Defective Component1
- Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
- Device Displays Incorrect Message1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions27
- No Patient Involvement9
- No Information4
- Burn(s)1
- Cardiac Arrest1
- Death1
- Insufficient Information1
- Necrosis1
CPR-D PADZ models
2 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- CPR-D PADZ 8900-0800-01Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable)2 deaths43 reports
- CPR-D PADZ 8900-0815-01Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable)3 reports
Recent CPR-D PADZ adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 28, 2026Failure of Device to Self-Test
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEVICE FAILED SELF TEST USING THESE ELECTRODE PADS.COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50497964 ↗MalfunctionOct 28, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A MALE PATIENT (AGE UNKNOWN), THE ELECTRODE PADS WOULD NOT ADHERE TO THE PATIENT'S SKIN. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE CLINICIAN OBTAINED ANOTHER SET OF PADS TO CONTINUE TREATING THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE PATIENT SUBSEQUENTLY EXPIRED.
Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest
MAUDE report 23403034 ↗MalfunctionOct 15, 2025Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR PROMPTED A "UNIT FAILED" MESSAGE USING THESE ATTACHED ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23285158 ↗MalfunctionJan 31, 2025Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE ASSOCIATED DEVICE PROMPTED A "UNIT FAILED" MESSAGE USING THESE CPR-D PADZ. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21284005 ↗MalfunctionDec 12, 2024Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR DOES NOT RECOGNIZED THESE ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20915749 ↗MalfunctionDec 10, 2024Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEVICE INAPPROPRIATELY DISPLAYED A "PLUG IN CABLE" MESSAGE USING THESE ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20892321 ↗MalfunctionSep 19, 2024Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR WAS UNABLE TO DETECT THESE ATTACHED ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20262395 ↗MalfunctionJun 18, 2024Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING INCOMING INSPECTION, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR FAILED SELF TEST USING THESE ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19557080 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2024Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING FUNCTIONAL TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR DISPLAYED A "PLUG IN CABLE" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT DID NOT INDICATE THAT THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19351115 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2024Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO DEFIBRILLATE A MALE PATIENT (AGE UNKNOWN), THE ELECTRODE PADS WERE DAMAGED DURING REMOVAL FROM THE PACKAGING. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19031952 ↗MalfunctionMar 21, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO MONITOR A 50-60-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT, THE ELECTRODES WOULD NOT ADHERE TO THE PATIENT'S SKIN. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE CLINICIAN OBTAINED ANOTHER DEVICE TO CONTINUE TREATING THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18949295 ↗MalfunctionAug 17, 2023Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE ASSOCIATED DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO DETECT THE ATTACHED ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17568287 ↗MalfunctionAug 15, 2023Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING INCOMING TESTING, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR PROMPTED A "PLUG IN CABLE MESSAGE -- INAPPROPRIATE" MESSAGE USING THESE ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17548178 ↗MalfunctionMay 23, 2023Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING INCOMING INSPECTION, THE ASSOCIATED DEFIBRILLATOR WAS UNABLE TO DETECT THESE ATTACHED ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16983841 ↗MalfunctionMar 21, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO DEFIBRILLATE A MALE PATIENT (AGE UNKNOWN), THE ELECTRODES WOULD NOT ADHERE TO THE PATIENT'S SKIN. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16585190 ↗
Other Zoll Medical Corporation products
- R SERIES94 models · 8,522 reports
- X SERIES163 models · 6,915 reports
- AED PLUS30 models · 1,966 reports · 1 recall
- Z Vent6 models · 1,204 reports · 1 recall
- Model EMV+ Vent, Army, MRI3 models · 964 reports
- E SERIES160 models · 833 reports
- ONESTEP8 models · 586 reports
- M SERIES BIPHASIC59 models · 572 reports
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page