MaxGuardRecalls & reported problems across all models
BD Switzerland Sàrl · 49 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
11 open recalls name at least one MaxGuard model. Check whether yours is affected in the recall details, and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 780
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls
- 11
We found 49 models of MaxGuard by BD Switzerland Sàrl in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 780 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jun 11, 2018 and Sep 24, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries, 774 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Leak/Splash” (162 reports).
11 FDA recall records name at least one of these models by its device identifier, 11 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
MaxGuard recalls
FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.
- Jun 16, 2026Open, Classified
Due to mechanical issue with internal sterilization equipment resulting in potential underdosing of product during processing, which may have resulted in products not being sterilized correctly.
Z-2941-2026 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Oct 11, 2023Open, Classified
Affected infusion sets labeled as free of DEHP actually do contain di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP).
Z-0351-2024 · Root cause: Error in labeling · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Aug 1, 2022Open, Classified
Administration set, and extension set product labels list expiration year 2027 but the labels should list expiration year 2025. If expired product is used, the integrity of the product may be compromised, and may result in potential leaks and risk of infection to the patient and healthcare worker.
Z-1760-2022 · Root cause: Error in labeling · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Aug 1, 2022Open, Classified
Administration set, and extension set product labels list expiration year 2027 but the labels should list expiration year 2025. If expired product is used, the integrity of the product may be compromised, and may result in potential leaks and risk of infection to the patient and healthcare worker.
Z-1759-2022 · Root cause: Error in labeling · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Aug 1, 2022Open, Classified
Administration set, and extension set product labels list expiration year 2027 but the labels should list expiration year 2025. If expired product is used, the integrity of the product may be compromised, and may result in potential leaks and risk of infection to the patient and healthcare worker.
Z-1758-2022 · Root cause: Error in labeling · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Aug 1, 2022Open, Classified
Administration set, and extension set product labels list expiration year 2027 but the labels should list expiration year 2025. If expired product is used, the integrity of the product may be compromised, and may result in potential leaks and risk of infection to the patient and healthcare worker.
Z-1757-2022 · Root cause: Error in labeling · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Aug 1, 2022Open, Classified
Administration set, and extension set product labels list expiration year 2027 but the labels should list expiration year 2025. If expired product is used, the integrity of the product may be compromised, and may result in potential leaks and risk of infection to the patient and healthcare worker.
Z-1756-2022 · Root cause: Error in labeling · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Aug 1, 2022Open, Classified
Administration set, and extension set product labels list expiration year 2027 but the labels should list expiration year 2025. If expired product is used, the integrity of the product may be compromised, and may result in potential leaks and risk of infection to the patient and healthcare worker.
Z-1755-2022 · Root cause: Error in labeling · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Aug 1, 2022Open, Classified
Administration set, and extension set product labels list expiration year 2027 but the labels should list expiration year 2025. If expired product is used, the integrity of the product may be compromised, and may result in potential leaks and risk of infection to the patient and healthcare worker.
Z-1754-2022 · Root cause: Error in labeling · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Aug 1, 2022Open, Classified
Administration set, and extension set product labels list expiration year 2027 but the labels should list expiration year 2025. If expired product is used, the integrity of the product may be compromised, and may result in potential leaks and risk of infection to the patient and healthcare worker.
Z-1753-2022 · Root cause: Error in labeling · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Aug 1, 2022Open, Classified
Administration set, and extension set product labels list expiration year 2027 but the labels should list expiration year 2025. If expired product is used, the integrity of the product may be compromised, and may result in potential leaks and risk of infection to the patient and healthcare worker.
Z-1752-2022 · Root cause: Error in labeling · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported MaxGuard problems
Device problems
- Leak/Splash162
- Break160
- Fluid/Blood Leak115
- Complete Blockage111
- Insufficient Device Problem Information41
- Defective Component37
- Material Separation37
- Crack34
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions393
- No Information173
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient151
- Insufficient Information35
- No Patient Involvement15
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient12
- Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension4
- Underdose3
MaxGuard models
49 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- MaxGuard ME2017Set, administration, intravascular137 reports
- MaxGuard ME2020Set, administration, intravascular94 reports
- MaxGuard ME1224Set, administration, intravascular1 recall43 reports
- MaxGuard MFS141Set, administration, intravascular1 recall40 reports
- MaxGuard MX4436Set, administration, intravascular1 recall30 reports
- MaxGuard MX9166Set, administration, intravascular1 recall23 reports
- MaxGuard ME2010Set, administration, intravascular1 recall19 reports
- MaxGuard MX9433Set, administration, intravascular1 recall15 reports
- MaxGuard MX9059Set, administration, intravascular1 recall8 reports
- MaxGuard MX9171Set, administration, intravascular1 recall7 reports
- MaxGuard MX4439Set, administration, intravascular54 reports
- MaxGuard MFS106Set, administration, intravascular1 recall2 reports
- MaxGuard M4058Set, administration, intravascular1 recall0 reports
- MaxGuard ME1069Set, administration, intravascular1 recall0 reports
- MaxGuard ME5303Set, administration, intravascular47 reports
- MaxGuard MX4452Set, administration, intravascular35 reports
- MaxGuard MX9128Set, administration, intravascular29 reports
- MaxGuard MX4450Set, administration, intravascular22 reports
- MaxGuard MX5301Set, administration, intravascular18 reports
- MaxGuard MX9968Set, administration, intravascular14 reports
- MaxGuard ME2064Set, administration, intravascular13 reports
- MaxGuard ME1225Set, administration, intravascular11 reports
- MaxGuard MFS102Set, administration, intravascular11 reports
- MaxGuard MA3131Set, administration, intravascular10 reports
- MaxGuard ME2050Set, administration, intravascular10 reports
- MaxGuard MX5302Set, administration, intravascular10 reports
- MaxGuard ME1021Set, administration, intravascular8 reports
- MaxGuard MX9060Set, administration, intravascular7 reports
- MaxGuard MXT1003Set, administration, intravascular7 reports
- MaxGuard ME1055Set, administration, intravascular6 reports
- MaxGuard ME1110Set, administration, intravascular6 reports
- MaxGuard M4018Set, administration, intravascular5 reports
- MaxGuard ME1001Set, administration, intravascular5 reports
- MaxGuard ME5301Set, administration, intravascular4 reports
- MaxGuard ME2068Set, administration, intravascular4 reports
- MaxGuard ME1247Set, administration, intravascular3 reports
- MaxGuard ME1032Set, administration, intravascular2 reports
- MaxGuard ME1046Set, administration, intravascular2 reports
- MaxGuard ME1048Set, administration, intravascular2 reports
- MaxGuard ME2059Set, administration, intravascular2 reports
- MaxGuard ME5302Set, administration, intravascular2 reports
- MaxGuard MFS124Set, administration, intravascular2 reports
- MaxGuard MFS132Set, administration, intravascular2 reports
- MaxGuard MX4410Set, administration, intravascular2 reports
- MaxGuard MX4457Set, administration, intravascular2 reports
- MaxGuard MX9182Set, administration, intravascular2 reports
- MaxGuard ME1227Set, administration, intravascular1 report
- MaxGuard MM4000Set, administration, intravascular1 report
- MaxGuard MXT1006Set, administration, intravascular1 report
Recent MaxGuard adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 24, 2026Contamination /Decontamination Problem
It was reported that BD alaris extension set had foreign matter The following information was received by the initial reporter with the following VerbatimIt was reported by customer that the Black speck present within the tubing line.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50876666 ↗MalfunctionSep 22, 2026Free or Unrestricted Flow
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50861493 ↗MalfunctionSep 21, 2026Complete Blockage
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50846895 ↗MalfunctionSep 9, 2026Complete Blockage
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50702904 ↗MalfunctionAug 25, 2026Leak/Splash
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50422105 ↗MalfunctionAug 17, 2026Backflow
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50287846 ↗MalfunctionJun 30, 2026Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BD MAXGUARD EXTENSION SET WAS LEAKING THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER WITH THE FOLLOWING VERBATIM IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT THEY PULLED BACK FROM THE OPEN END OF THE EXTENSION TUBING TO WASTE BLOOD, AND BLOOD AND SALINE BEGIN LEAKING OUT OF THE Y-SITE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25667852 ↗MalfunctionJun 30, 2026Backflow
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BD MAXGUARD EXTENSION SET W/ NEEDLELESS Y-SITE HAD FLOW ISSUES. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: CUSTOMER HAS REPORTED ISSUES OF THE BACKCHECK VALVE ON THE MX9182 NOT WORKING CORRECTLY. HE HAS SAVED THE SAMPLE AND HAS THE LOT # INFORMATION AS WELL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE CUSTOMER: COULD YOU PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ISSUE YOU ENCOUNTERED WITH BACKCHECK VALVE ON THE MX9182? WE IDENTIFIED AN ISSUE WITH THE BACKCHECK VALVE¿S INTENDED ONE WAY VALVE. WHEN SLIGHT POSITIVE PRESSURE IS APPLIED ON THE BACKCHECK SIDE OF THE VALVE SUCH AS DURING MEDICATION INFUSION, FLUSHING, OR MANUAL INJECTION THROUGH A LUER-LOCK ACCESS PORT THE VALVE DOES NOT CONSISTENTLY PREVENT RETROGRADE FLOW. UNDER THESE CONDITIONS, THE APPLIED PRESSURE APPEARS TO BYPASS THE VALVE DIAPHRAGM, ALLOWING FLUID TO TRAVEL BACKWARD INTO THE UPSTREAM LINE. THIS OCCURS WITH MINIMAL FORCE, CONSISTENT WITH NORMAL FLUSHING OR MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION, AND DOES NOT REQUIRE EXCESSIVE PRESSURE. AS A RESULT, THE VALVE FAILS TO RELIABLY MAINTAIN DIRECTIONAL FLOW AS DESIGNED. THIS BEHAVIOR CREATES THE POTENTIAL FOR UNINTENDED BACKFLOW INTO THE
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25667849 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2026Disconnection
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BD MAXGUARD PRESSURE RATED EXTENSION SET HAD CONNECTION ISSUES. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: THE SITE KEEPS COMING UNHOOKED FROM THE PATIENTS. IT HAS HAPPENED 3 TIMES. INJURIES OR ADVERSE EVENT: YES. ITEM: MX5302, QUANTITY AFFECTED: 3 EA, SERIAL/LOT NUMBER: (B)(6), ARE SAMPLES POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED OR BIOHAZARD? N/A.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25640521 ↗MalfunctionJun 11, 2026Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BD MAXGUARD EXTENSION SET WAS KINKED. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER WITH THE FOLLOWING VERBATIM IT WAS REPORTED BY A CUSTOMER THAT THE SYRINGE TUBING AND LODGED WITHIN THE IV CLAVE. THEY WERE UNABLE TO REMOVE IT, WHICH ULTIMATELY REQUIRED THE ENTIRE CLAVE TO BE CHANGED ON A PEDIATRIC IV. ALSO, THE TUBING IS TIGHTLY COILED WITHIN THE PACKAGING, AND WHEN OPENED QUICKLY, IT TENDS TO BECOME TANGLED AND DIFFICULT TO UNRAVEL. THIS CREATES DELAYS AND FRUSTRATION DURING PATIENT CAR.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25474088 ↗MalfunctionJun 11, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BD MAXGUARD EXTENSION SET HAD CONNECTION ISSUES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER WITH THE FOLLOWING VERBATIM IT WAS REPORTED BY A CUSTOMER THAT THE SYRINGE TUBING AND LODGED WITHIN THE IV CLAVE. THEY WERE UNABLE TO REMOVE IT, WHICH ULTIMATELY REQUIRED THE ENTIRE CLAVE TO BE CHANGED ON A PEDIATRIC IV. ALSO, THE TUBING IS TIGHTLY COILED WITHIN THE PACKAGING, AND WHEN OPENED QUICKLY, IT TENDS TO BECOME TANGLED AND DIFFICULT TO UNRAVEL. THIS CREATES DELAYS AND FRUSTRATION DURING PATIENT CARE
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25474085 ↗MalfunctionJun 11, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BD MAXGUARD EXTENSION SET HAD CONNECTION ISSUES. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER WITH THE FOLLOWING VERBATIM IT WAS REPORTED BY A CUSTOMER THAT THE SYRINGE TUBING AND LODGED WITHIN THE IV CLAVE. THEY WERE UNABLE TO REMOVE IT, WHICH ULTIMATELY REQUIRED THE ENTIRE CLAVE TO BE CHANGED ON A PEDIATRIC IV. ALSO, THE TUBING IS TIGHTLY COILED WITHIN THE PACKAGING, AND WHEN OPENED QUICKLY, IT TENDS TO BECOME TANGLED AND DIFFICULT TO UNRAVEL. THIS CREATES DELAYS AND FRUSTRATION DURING PATIENT CARE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25473298 ↗MalfunctionJun 8, 2026Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BD MAXGUARD PRESSURE RATED EXTENSION SET WAS SEPARATEDTHE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER WITH THE FOLLOWING VERBATIMIT WAS REPORTED BY CUSTOMER THAT "INFUSION SET'S TUBING MAY SEPARATE, LEAK, OR FAIL TO PRIME"
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25437686 ↗MalfunctionApr 23, 2026Complete Blockage
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BD MAXGUARD PRESSURE RATED EXTENSION SET HAD FLOW ISSUES. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: BLOCKAGE ISSUES WERE IDENTIFIED ON OPENED ITEMS. INJURIES OR ADVERSE EVENT: NO, ITEM: MX5301, SERIAL/LOT NUMBER: (B)(6).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24974360 ↗MalfunctionApr 7, 2026Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED BY CUSTOMER THAT THE END THAT ATTACHES TO THE IV PRIMARY LINE CAME APART FROM THE TUBING.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24802763 ↗
Other BD Switzerland Sàrl products
- Alaris, SmartSite160 models · 10,227 reports · 8 recalls
- Alaris85 models · 2,797 reports · 10 recalls
- MaxZero47 models · 2,377 reports
- BD PhaSeal23 models · 992 reports · 2 recalls
- MaxPlus18 models · 762 reports · 2 recalls
- BD SmartSite29 models · 568 reports · 4 recalls
- Alaris, SmartSite, Texium12 models · 291 reports · 5 recalls
- BD PhaSeal Optima11 models · 474 reports · 1 recall
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page