Multi-unit Abutment PlusRecalls & reported problems across all models
Nobel Biocare AB · 5 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 20
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 20
- Recalls
- 0
We found 5 models of Multi-unit Abutment Plus by Nobel Biocare AB in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 20 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Sep 23, 2019 and May 9, 2026 — classified as 20 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (8 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported Multi-unit Abutment Plus problems
Device problems
- Loss of Osseointegration8
- Failure to Osseointegrate7
- Device Markings/Labelling Problem2
- Fracture2
- Device Damaged by Another Device1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant14
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
- Pain2
Multi-unit Abutment Plus models
5 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Multi-unit Abutment Plus 38882ABUTMENT, IMPLANT, DENTAL, ENDOSSEOUS8 reports
- Multi-unit Abutment Plus 38879ABUTMENT, IMPLANT, DENTAL, ENDOSSEOUS5 reports
- Multi-unit Abutment Plus 38895ABUTMENT, IMPLANT, DENTAL, ENDOSSEOUS4 reports
- Multi-unit Abutment Plus 38887ABUTMENT, IMPLANT, DENTAL, ENDOSSEOUS2 reports
- Multi-unit Abutment Plus 38897ABUTMENT, IMPLANT, DENTAL, ENDOSSEOUS1 report
Recent Multi-unit Abutment Plus adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 9, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 25132927 ↗InjuryMay 9, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 25132923 ↗InjuryJul 31, 2025Fracture; Fracture
COMPONENT FRACTURED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22680935 ↗InjuryJul 31, 2025Fracture; Fracture
COMPONENT FRACTURED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22680926 ↗InjuryApr 8, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 19065398 ↗InjuryApr 8, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 19065365 ↗InjuryNov 23, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18202636 ↗InjuryNov 23, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18202634 ↗InjurySep 12, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 17732006 ↗InjurySep 12, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 17731963 ↗InjurySep 12, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 17731935 ↗InjuryAug 30, 2023Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
THE IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO USABILITY - WRONG PART USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17653778 ↗InjuryAug 30, 2023Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
THE IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO USABILITY - WRONG PART USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17653775 ↗InjuryJan 23, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 16228025 ↗InjuryJan 23, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 16227931 ↗
Other Nobel Biocare AB products
- NobelActive56 models · 152,066 reports
- NobelReplace120 models · 138,221 reports · 15 recalls
- NobelParallel54 models · 132,525 reports
- NobelActive TiUltra28 models · 82,969 reports
- NobelParallel Conical Connection TiUltra27 models · 68,868 reports
- Replace Select107 models · 33,616 reports
- NobelReplace Conical Connection TiUltra15 models · 31,165 reports
- NobelSpeedy88 models · 24,246 reports
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page