Multi-unit Abutment Plus 38879Recalls & reported problems
Nobel Biocare AB · Multi-unit Abutment Plus Conical Connection RP 1.5mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Multi-unit Abutment Plus (5)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07332747115987), received between Sep 23, 2019 and Nov 23, 2023 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Markings/Labelling Problem” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Markings/Labelling Problem2
- Loss of Osseointegration2
- Device Damaged by Another Device1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 23, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18202636 ↗InjuryNov 23, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO A LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18202634 ↗InjuryAug 30, 2023Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
THE IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO USABILITY - WRONG PART USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17653778 ↗InjuryAug 30, 2023Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
THE IMPLANT FAILED DUE TO USABILITY - WRONG PART USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17653775 ↗InjurySep 23, 2019Device Damaged by Another Device; Device Damaged by Another Device
IMPLANT REMOVED DUE TO SCREW FRACTURE INSIDE OF THE ABUTMENT.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 9104300 ↗
Other ABUTMENT, IMPLANT, DENTAL, ENDOSSEOUS devices
- CERTAIN® GOLD-TITE® IUNIHGZimVie US Corp LLC · ABUTMENT, IMPLANT, DENTAL, ENDOSSEOUS151 reports
- Nobel Biocare® 36662Nobel Biocare AB · ABUTMENT, IMPLANT, DENTAL, ENDOSSEOUS2 recalls5 reports
- CERTAIN® IUNIHTZimVie US Corp LLC · ABUTMENT, IMPLANT, DENTAL, ENDOSSEOUS67 reports
- ATLANTIS® 35502Dentsply Ih, Inc. · ABUTMENT, IMPLANT, DENTAL, ENDOSSEOUS66 reports
- ATLANTIS® 35502Dentsply Ih, Inc. · Abutment, implant, dental, endosseous54 reports
- Esthetic Abutment 36669Nobel Biocare AB · ABUTMENT, IMPLANT, DENTAL, ENDOSSEOUS1 recall2 reports
- CERTAIN® BELLATEK® IEDAT5ZimVie US Corp LLC · ABUTMENT, IMPLANT, DENTAL, ENDOSSEOUS1 recall1 report
- Straumann Anatomic Healing Abutments XC (AHA) Healing ComponentsInstitut Straumann AG · Abutment, implant, dental, endosseous1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page