RUNTHROUGHRecalls & reported problems across all models
Terumo Corporation · 7 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 170
- Deaths reported
- 4
- Injuries reported
- 145
- Recalls
- 0
We found 7 models of RUNTHROUGH by Terumo Corporation in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 170 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Nov 14, 2016 and Jul 27, 2026 — classified as 4 deaths, 145 injuries, 21 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (66 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported RUNTHROUGH problems
Device problems
- Material Separation66
- Break53
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem25
- Difficult to Remove10
- Material Fragmentation8
- Material Deformation7
- Physical Resistance/Sticking7
- Unraveled Material5
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient73
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque35
- Perforation17
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions14
- Blood Loss11
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient7
- Perforation of Vessels5
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding4
RUNTHROUGH models
7 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- RUNTHROUGH 25-1011WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER2 deaths103 reports
- RUNTHROUGH 25-1011Wire, guide, catheter2 deaths31 reports
- RUNTHROUGH 25-5211Wire, guide, catheter13 reports
- RUNTHROUGH 25-1013WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER10 reports
- RUNTHROUGH 25-3011WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER8 reports
- RUNTHROUGH 25-3013WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER3 reports
- RUNTHROUGH 25-5011Wire, guide, catheter2 reports
Recent RUNTHROUGH adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
DeathJul 27, 2026Material Fragmentation
Terumo received the following information: It was reported that during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) the wire upon removal became entrapped by the stent placed in the distal left anterior descending artery (LAD) and was frayed. A portion of wire remained entrapped in the patient. There was no blood loss.Terumo Medical Corporation received an FDA MedWatch Report on (b)(6) 2026. The event description states: "Patient had heart failure, and had an impella placed in operating room prior to planned coronary angiogram for high risk cornary artery disease.In the cardiac cath lab, during angiogram, the Runthrough white wire, upon removal, became entrapped by the stent placed in the distal left anterior descending artery and was frayed. A portion of the wire remained entrapped in the patient. Retained wire was removed from patient. Wire fracture with retained wire in the LM (Left Main Coronary Artery) into LAD (Left Anterior Descending Artery), some of the wire able to be snared with filament protruding still into the aorta."Additional information was received on 30Jun2026: The wire became entrapped in the distal edge of the distal edge of the stent and became uncoiled upon attem
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Obstruction/Occlusion
MAUDE report 50036062 ↗InjuryJul 15, 2026Peeled/Delaminated; Unraveled Material
TERUMO MEDICAL RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: DURING A PCI, THE RUNTHROUGH NS 180 CM WIRE WAS USED TO WIRE THE LESION. THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF THE WIRE UNRAVELED AND SHEARED OFF IN THE CIRCUMFLEX PATIENT STARTED HAVING BRADYCARDIA. THE DOCTOR SAW EVIDENCE OF PLAQUE SHIFTING TOO. THEREFORE, AN INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND (IVUS) WAS PERFORMED TO SEE INSIDE THE VESSEL. A SECOND RUNTHROUGH NS WIRE WAS OPENED AND USED TO FINISH THE CASE. A 3.5X16MM (CORONARY STENT) WAS PLACED TO TACK THE SHEARED OFF WIRE AND PLAQUE TO THE WALL OF THE CIRCUMFLEX AND FLOW WAS RESTORED. THE PATIENT WAS DOING WELL AND WAS NOT HAVING ANY ISSUES AT THAT POINT. NO BLOOD LOSS WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25827440 ↗InjuryJul 14, 2026Break; Unintended Deflation
TERUMO MEDICAL RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: THE RT GOT JAILED/STUCK BETWEEN STENT AND TISSUE DURING A LEFT HEART CATH (LHC). THE DOCTOR TRIED BALLOONING OVER THE WIRE TO RELEASE; HOWEVER, THAT DID NOT WORK. THE PULLED ON THE RT WIRE AND IT BROKE WIRE OFF AT JUNCTION POINT AS WELL AS STRETCHED WIRE. THE DOCTOR CALLED ANOTHER SURGEON AND THE PATIENT SENT TO SURGERY TO REMOVE THE WIRE; HOWEVER, THERE WERE NO DETAILS ON THE SUCCESS OR EXTENT OF THE REMOVAL. NO BLOOD LOSS WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25813186 ↗MalfunctionJul 14, 2026Break; Unintended Deflation
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25812973 ↗MalfunctionJul 9, 2026Material Fragmentation
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25765841 ↗DeathJun 30, 2026
PATIENT HAD HEART FAILURE, AND HAD AN IMPELLA PLACED IN OR PRIOR TO PLANNED CORONARY ANGIOGRAM FOR HIGH RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE. IN THE CARDIAC CATH LAB, DURING ANGIOGRAM, THE RUN THROUGH WHITE WIRE, UPON REMOVAL, BECAME ENTRAPPED BY THE STENT PLACED IN THE DISTAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY AND WAS FRAYED. A PORTION OF THE WIRE REMAINED ENTRAPPED IN THE PATIENT. RETAINED WIRE WAS REMOVED FROM PATIENT. WIRE FRACTURE WITH RETAINED WIRE IN THE LM (LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY) INTO LAD (LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY), SOME OF THE WIRE ABLE TO BE SNARED WITH FILAMENT PROTRUDING STILL INTO THE AORTA. MANUFACTURER RESPONSE FOR WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER, RUN THROUGH (PER SITE REPORTER).
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Unspecified Heart Problem
MAUDE report 25664207 ↗InjuryFeb 12, 2026Material Fragmentation
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING REPORTED INFORMATION: A TINY PIECE OF THE RUNTHROUGH WIRE BROKE OFF/CAME OFF WITHIN THE PATIENT DURING THE CORONARY ANGIOGRAM CASE. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, THEY ATTEMPTED TO PLASTY WITH BALLOON TO "TRAP" PIECE OF WIRE AND ATTEMPTED TO SNARE. THERE WAS CALCIUM PRESENT IN PATIENT'S ANATOMY WHEN THE WIRE FRAGMENT BROKE OFF. THE CASE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THE EVENT DID NOT CAUSE ANY HARM, AND THE PATIENT WAS IN STABLE CONDITION.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24326289 ↗InjuryFeb 12, 2026Material Fragmentation
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING REPORTED INFORMATION: A TINY PIECE OF THE RUNTHROUGH WIRE BROKE OFF/CAME OFF WITHIN THE PATIENT DURING THE CORONARY ANGIOGRAM CASE. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, THEY ATTEMPTED TO PLASTY WITH BALLOON TO "TRAP" PIECE OF WIRE AND ATTEMPTED TO SNARE. THERE WAS CALCIUM PRESENT IN PATIENT'S ANATOMY WHEN THE WIRE FRAGMENT BROKE OFF. THE CASE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THE EVENT DID NOT CAUSE ANY HARM, AND THE PATIENT WAS IN STABLE CONDITION.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24326262 ↗InjuryNov 11, 2025Break; Break
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE REPORTED INFORMATION. THE DOCTOR STATED WHEN HE SHAPED THE WIRE THE TIP FEELS LIKE IT BREAKS OR WAS BROKEN. THE TYPE OF PROCEDURE WAS A LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION. THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 27OCT2025: THE FIELD CLINICAL SPECIALIST (FCS) WAS PRESENT FOR THE PROCEDURE ON (B)(6). DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DOCTOR COMMENTED THAT THE WIRE TIP SEEMED BROKEN WHEN HE WENT TO SHAPE IT. THERE WAS NO HARM CAUSED TO THE PATIENT. THE TIP DID NOT SEPARATE FROM THE WIRE HOWEVER IT DOES FEEL LIKE IT WAS BROKEN. WHEN WAS SHAPED THE WIRE INSTEAD OF THE TIP REPLICATING A NICE CURVE, IT SEEMED TO KINK OR BREAK AT ONE POINT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 31OCT2025: THE DOCTOR STATED THAT HE HAS NOTICED THIS LATELY WITH THE TIP.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23524372 ↗MalfunctionNov 11, 2025Break; Break
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE REPORTED INFORMATION. THE DOCTOR STATED WHEN HE SHAPED THE WIRE THE TIP FEELS LIKE IT BREAKS OR WAS BROKEN. THE TYPE OF PROCEDURE WAS A LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION. THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 27OCT2025: THE FIELD CLINICAL SPECIALIST (FCS) WAS PRESENT FOR THE PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DOCTOR COMMENTED THAT THE WIRE TIP SEEMED BROKEN WHEN HE WENT TO SHAPE IT. THERE WAS NO HARM CAUSED TO THE PATIENT. THE TIP DID NOT SEPARATE FROM THE WIRE HOWEVER IT DOES FEEL LIKE IT WAS BROKEN. WHEN WAS SHAPED THE WIRE INSTEAD OF THE TIP REPLICATING A NICE CURVE, IT SEEMED TO KINK OR BREAK AT ONE POINT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 31OCT2025: THE DOCTOR STATED THAT HE HAS NOTICED THIS LATELY WITH THE TIP.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23524370 ↗InjuryNov 11, 2025Break; Break
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE REPORTED INFORMATION. THE DOCTOR STATED WHEN HE SHAPED THE WIRE THE TIP FEELS LIKE IT BREAKS OR WAS BROKEN. THE TYPE OF PROCEDURE WAS A LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION. THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 27OCT2025: THE FIELD CLINICAL SPECIALIST (FCS) WAS PRESENT FOR THE PROCEDURE ON (B)(6). DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DOCTOR COMMENTED THAT THE WIRE TIP SEEMED BROKEN WHEN HE WENT TO SHAPE IT. THERE WAS NO HARM CAUSED TO THE PATIENT. THE TIP DID NOT SEPARATE FROM THE WIRE HOWEVER IT DOES FEEL LIKE IT WAS BROKEN. WHEN WAS SHAPED THE WIRE INSTEAD OF THE TIP REPLICATING A NICE CURVE, IT SEEMED TO KINK OR BREAK AT ONE POINT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 31OCT2025: THE DOCTOR STATED THAT HE HAS NOTICED THIS LATELY WITH THE TIP.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23524149 ↗MalfunctionNov 11, 2025Break; Break
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE REPORTED INFORMATION. THE DOCTOR STATED WHEN HE SHAPED THE WIRE THE TIP FEELS LIKE IT BREAKS OR WAS BROKEN. THE TYPE OF PROCEDURE WAS A LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION. THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 27OCT2025: THE FIELD CLINICAL SPECIALIST (FCS) WAS PRESENT FOR THE PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DOCTOR COMMENTED THAT THE WIRE TIP SEEMED BROKEN WHEN HE WENT TO SHAPE IT. THERE WAS NO HARM CAUSED TO THE PATIENT. THE TIP DID NOT SEPARATE FROM THE WIRE HOWEVER IT DOES FEEL LIKE IT WAS BROKEN. WHEN WAS SHAPED THE WIRE INSTEAD OF THE TIP REPLICATING A NICE CURVE, IT SEEMED TO KINK OR BREAK AT ONE POINT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 31OCT2025: THE DOCTOR STATED THAT HE HAS NOTICED THIS LATELY WITH THE TIP.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23524147 ↗InjuryOct 22, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
TERUMO MEDICAL RECEIVED A USER FACILITY MEDWATCH REPORT # (B)(4). THE MEDWATCH EVENT DESCRIPTION STATED THAT "THE DATE OF EVENT IS AUGUST 2025. THE WIRE FRACTURED IN THE CORONARY ARTERY. ATTEMPTED REMOVAL OF WIRE, APPROXIMATELY 10 MM OF WIRE LEFT IN VESSEL. PATIENT HAD NO CHEST PAIN AND HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE WHEN PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THE PROCEDURE WAS A LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 08OCT2025: ALL KNOWN INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO MEDSUN.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23359033 ↗InjuryOct 22, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
TERUMO MEDICAL RECEIVED A USER FACILITY MEDWATCH REPORT # (B)(4). THE MEDWATCH EVENT DESCRIPTION STATED THAT "THE DATE OF EVENT IS AUGUST 2025. THE WIRE FRACTURED IN THE CORONARY ARTERY. ATTEMPTED REMOVAL OF WIRE, APPROXIMATELY 10 MM OF WIRE LEFT IN VESSEL. PATIENT HAD NO CHEST PAIN AND HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE WHEN PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THE PROCEDURE WAS A LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 08OCT2025: ALL KNOWN INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO MEDSUN.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23357754 ↗InjurySep 16, 2025Fracture; Material Frayed; Fracture; Material Frayed
TERUMO MEDICAL RECEIVED A REPORT INVOLVING A WIRE MALFUNCTION DURING A PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) PROCEDURE. THE RTNS WIRE WAS POSITIONED IN A BRANCH VESSEL. UPON REMOVAL, THE WIRE BEGAN TO FRAY, AND A WIRE FRACTURE OCCURRED. THE WIRE WAS NOT TRAPPED BEHIND A STENT OR ANY OTHER OBSTRUCTION. MOST OF THE FRACTURED WIRE WAS SUCCESSFULLY SNARED AND REMOVED. THE EVENT OCCURRED INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE PATIENT REMAINED STABLE AND RECOVERED FROM THE PROCEDURE. NO BLOOD LOSS WAS REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 21 AUG 2025: THE ISSUE BECAME APPARENT UNDER FLUOROSCOPY WHILE ATTEMPTING TO RETRACT THE WIRE. NO TESTING WAS PERFORMED. A PORTION OF THE WIRE REMAINS IN THE PATIENT'S LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY. NO FURTHER ATTEMPTS WILL BE MADE TO RETRIEVE THE REMAINING WIRE. THE SAMPLE IS CONTAMINATED WITH BLOOD AND BODY FLUID BUT IS NOT CONTAMINATED WITH INFECTIOUS AGENTS OR ANTI-CANCER AGENTS.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23069843 ↗
Other Terumo Corporation products
All Terumo Corporation devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page