SPEEDTRAPRecalls & reported problems across all models
Medos International Sàrl · 6 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 117
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 11
- Recalls
- 0
We found 6 models of SPEEDTRAP by Medos International Sàrl in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 117 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Mar 12, 2018 and Jul 13, 2026 — classified as 11 injuries, 106 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (28 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported SPEEDTRAP problems
Device problems
- Break28
- Migration13
- Migration or Expulsion of Device11
- Material Split, Cut or Torn9
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem8
- Detachment of Device or Device Component8
- Device-Device Incompatibility7
- Crack6
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions55
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient44
- Not Applicable9
- Unspecified Infection8
- Unspecified Tissue Injury4
- Tissue Damage1
SPEEDTRAP models
6 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- SPEEDTRAP 223751SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE48 reports
- SPEEDTRAP 223746SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE40 reports
- SPEEDTRAP 223747SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE9 reports
- SPEEDTRAP 223750SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE9 reports
- SPEEDTRAP 223749SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE6 reports
- SPEEDTRAP 223748SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE5 reports
Recent SPEEDTRAP adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 13, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED SEPTIC INFECTION AFTER ACL (ANT.CRUCIATE LIGAMENT) RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY WHERE J&J IMPLANTS (DYNACORD X1, SPEEDTRAP X4, MILAGRO X1, RIGIDLOOP X1, ABSOLUTE X1) WERE UTILIZED. THE INITIAL ACL CASE TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE CASE, THERE WAS NO NOTABLE INCIDENT OBSERVED, ALL PROCEDURES FOLLOWED HOSPITAL POLICY AND THE CASE DURATION WAS APPROXIMATELY 1.5 HOURS. AFTER SURGERY, PATIENT VISITED THE SURGEON FOR CONSULTATION AND SURGEON PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS AND CLEANED WOUND. AS SITUATION WAS NOT IMPROVED, A SECOND SURGERY WAS ARRANGED ON (B)(6) 2026 TO REMOVE ALL IMPLANTS AND WASHED THE JOINT WITH ANTIBIOTICS. ALL IMPLANTS WERE DISCARDED ON (B)(6) 2026. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. REPORT 7 OF 8 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 25796238 ↗InjuryJul 13, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED SEPTIC INFECTION AFTER ACL (ANT.CRUCIATE LIGAMENT) RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY WHERE J&J IMPLANTS (DYNACORD X1, SPEEDTRAP X4, MILAGRO X1, RIGIDLOOP X1, ABSOLUTE X1) WERE UTILIZED. THE INITIAL ACL CASE TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6), 2026. DURING THE CASE, THERE WAS NO NOTABLE INCIDENT OBSERVED, ALL PROCEDURES FOLLOWED HOSPITAL POLICY AND THE CASE DURATION WAS APPROXIMATELY 1.5 HOURS. AFTER SURGERY, PATIENT VISITED THE SURGEON FOR CONSULTATION AND SURGEON PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS AND CLEANED WOUND. AS SITUATION WAS NOT IMPROVED, A SECOND SURGERY WAS ARRANGED ON (B)(6), 2026 TO REMOVE ALL IMPLANTS AND WASHED THE JOINT WITH ANTIBIOTICS. ALL IMPLANTS WERE DISCARDED ON (B)(6), 2026. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. REPORT 8 OF 8 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 25796236 ↗InjuryJul 13, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED SEPTIC INFECTION AFTER ACL (ANT.CRUCIATE LIGAMENT) RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY WHERE J&J IMPLANTS (DYNACORD X1, SPEEDTRAP X4, MILAGRO X1, RIGIDLOOP X1, ABSOLUTE X1) WERE UTILIZED. THE INITIAL ACL CASE TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE CASE, THERE WAS NO NOTABLE INCIDENT OBSERVED, ALL PROCEDURES FOLLOWED HOSPITAL POLICY AND THE CASE DURATION WAS APPROXIMATELY 1.5 HOURS. AFTER SURGERY, PATIENT VISITED THE SURGEON FOR CONSULTATION AND SURGEON PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS AND CLEANED WOUND. AS SITUATION WAS NOT IMPROVED, A SECOND SURGERY WAS ARRANGED ON (B)(6) 2026 TO REMOVE ALL IMPLANTS AND WASHED THE JOINT WITH ANTIBIOTICS. ALL IMPLANTS WERE DISCARDED ON (B)(6) 2026. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. REPORT 3 OF 8 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 25796225 ↗InjuryJul 13, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED SEPTIC INFECTION AFTER ACL (ANT.CRUCIATE LIGAMENT) RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY WHERE J&J IMPLANTS (DYNACORD X1, SPEEDTRAP X4, MILAGRO X1, RIGIDLOOP X1, ABSOLUTE X1) WERE UTILIZED. THE INITIAL ACL CASE TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE CASE, THERE WAS NO NOTABLE INCIDENT OBSERVED, ALL PROCEDURES FOLLOWED HOSPITAL POLICY AND THE CASE DURATION WAS APPROXIMATELY 1.5 HOURS. AFTER SURGERY, PATIENT VISITED THE SURGEON FOR CONSULTATION AND SURGEON PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS AND CLEANED WOUND. AS SITUATION WAS NOT IMPROVED, A SECOND SURGERY WAS ARRANGED ON (B)(6) 2026 TO REMOVE ALL IMPLANTS AND WASHED THE JOINT WITH ANTIBIOTICS. ALL IMPLANTS WERE DISCARDED ON (B)(6) 2026. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. REPORT 2 OF 8 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 25796223 ↗MalfunctionJun 8, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, THE SPEEDTRAP FAILED. AFTER THE GRAFT WAS PULLED INTO THE JOINT AND FIXED FEMORALLY, THE DOCTORS WANTED TO KNOT THE SUTURES OF THE TIBIAL END OF THE GRAFT, WHICH WERE MOUNTED BY A SPEEDTRAP DEVICE, TO THE TIBIA THROUGH A SUTURE WASHER. THAT'S WHEN THEY NOTICED THAT 1 THREAD OF THE SPEEDTRAP HAD BROKEN. THEY HAD TO MAKE A SMALL INCISION ON THE THIGH TO REMOVE THE RIGIDLOOP ADJUSTABLE PLATE AND THEN TAKE THE GRAFT OUT THROUGH THE JOINT. THEN THEY RESEWED EVERYTHING WITH A NEW RLA AND SPEEDTRAP DEVICE AND FIXED EVERYTHING ANEW. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS A 20 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE REPORTED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Tissue Injury
MAUDE report 25425055 ↗MalfunctionMar 3, 2026Mechanical Jam
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE THAT THE SPEEDTRAP WHITE 20MM DEVICE THAT THE STUMP OF THE GRAFT WAS CLAMPED WITH THE SPEEDTRAP AND THE SUTURE WAS PULLED, BUT IT WAS VERY TIGHT AND THE LAST SUTURE COULD NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE DEVICE. ALL OF THE SPEEDTRAP THREADS WERE REMOVED AND A DIFFERENT SPEEDTRAP WAS USED TO RETHREAD THE SUTURES, WHICH ALLOWED THE GRAFT TO BE FIXED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE REPORTED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24503135 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED SURGICAL PROCEDURE IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE SPEEDTRAP WHITE 20MM DEVICE FAILED TO TRAP THE GRAFT PROPERLY AND THE SUTURE TANGLED UP DURING TIGHTENING. ANOTHER LIKE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE REPORTED. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF INJURIES, MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION. THE DATE OF EVENT WAS UNKNOWN BUT WAS KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED IN 2025. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23838871 ↗MalfunctionDec 10, 2025Crack; Crack
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT PROCEDURE, THE SPEEDTRAP WHITE 20MM DEVICE SUTURE OF THE SPEED TRAP WAS TORN (CONSTRUCT BREAK DOWN) WHEN TRYING TO USE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE REPORTED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23769780 ↗MalfunctionOct 15, 2025Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED SURGICAL PROCEDURE THE SPEEDTRAP WHITE 20MM DEVICE CAME LOOSE WHEN IT WAS USED DURING SURGERY. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED, AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY AND NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23301690 ↗MalfunctionSep 10, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED SURGICAL PROCEDURE IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE SUTURE OF SPEEDTRAP GRN/WHITE 20MM DEVICE WAS BROKEN WHEN TENSIONING FOR INSERTING THE INTRAFIX ADVANCE SCREW. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT, OR SURGICAL DELAY. THE EXACT DATE OF THE EVENT WAS NOT REPORTED, HOWEVER, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE EVENT OCCURRED IN 2025. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COULD BE PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23020545 ↗MalfunctionJun 12, 2025Break; Difficult to Advance; Break; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT REPAIR PROCEDURE, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE SUTURE FROM THE SPEEDTRAP WHITE 20 MM DEVICE SNAPPED WHILE THE GRAFT WAS BEING THREADED THROUGH THE BURR HOLE AS THE FINAL STEP. IT WAS ALSO INDICATED THAT RETRACTION TOWARDS THE TIBIA WAS CHALLENGING. WHILE THERE WAS TENSION ON THE SUTURE THAT CAUSED IT TO FLIP, IT WAS NOT BEING SUBJECTED TO EXCESSIVE PULLING. ALTHOUGH THE GRAFT SUTURE AREA DID NOT WEAKEN, RELYING ON ONLY ONE SUTURE FOR FIXATION PRESENTED SOME CHALLENGES. THE SURGEON EFFECTIVELY MANAGED THE SITUATION AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE SURGERY. THERE WAS THIRTY-MINUTE DELAY TO THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF INJURIES, MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22193780 ↗MalfunctionMay 22, 2025Mechanical Problem; Unintended Movement; Mechanical Problem; Unintended Movement
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED SURGICAL PROCEDURE THE SPEEDTRAP GRN/WHITE 20MM DEVICE BOTTOM SUTURE OF THE SPEED TRAP WAS LOOSE AS PER SURGEON, WHICH CAUSED THE SPEED TRAP TO SLIP OFF THE GRAFT WHEN TIGHTENED TO THE GRAFT. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE EXACT DATE OF THIS EVENT WAS UNKNOWN BUT WAS NOTED TO HAVE OCCURRED IN 2025. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE REPORTED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22070519 ↗MalfunctionMay 7, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT REPAIR (ACL) SURGICAL PROCEDURE THE SPEEDTRAP WHITE 30MM 4PK DEVICE SPEED TRAP GRAFT PREPARATION FAILED UPON DEPLOYMENT. ANOTHER LIKE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE REPORTED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21979840 ↗MalfunctionJan 29, 2025Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED SURGICAL PROCEDURE THE SPEEDTRAP GRN/WHITE 20MM DEVICE WAS BEING USED WHEN THE DEVICE SLIPPED AND CAME OFF DURING GRAFT CREATION. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED AND THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH NO PROBLEMS. SINCE IT WAS DISLODGED WHILE WORKING OUTSIDE THE BODY, THERE WERE NO REMAINS IN THE PATIENT'S BODY AND NO EFFECTS. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY AND NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21263338 ↗MalfunctionJan 14, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED SURGICAL PROCEDURE BEFORE TIGHTENING THE SPEEDTRAP WHITE 30MM DEVICE THE SUTURE DETACHED BEFORE TIGHTENING. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETE SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE REPORTED. NO FRAGMENTS WERE GENERATED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. THE DATE OF EVENT WAS UNKNOWN BUT WAS KNOWN TO HAVE OCCURRED IN 2024. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21152088 ↗
Other Medos International Sàrl products
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD6 models · 4,109 reports
- FMS39 models · 3,588 reports
- EXPEDIUM291 models · 3,312 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE90 models · 2,686 reports
- EXPRESSEW6 models · 2,459 reports
- OMNISPAN ORTHOCORD3 models · 1,581 reports
- HEALIX ADVANCE ORTHOCORD21 models · 1,311 reports
- PROWLER SELECT9 models · 1,066 reports
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page