Tornier Perform Reversed Augmented GlenoidRecalls & reported problems across all models

We found 8 models of Tornier Perform Reversed Augmented Glenoid by Tornier, Inc. in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 121 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Mar 8, 2022 and Sep 18, 2026 — classified as 109 injuries, 12 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (11 reports).

1 FDA recall record name at least one of these models by its device identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works

Tornier Perform Reversed Augmented Glenoid recalls

FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.

1. Sep 15, 2023Open, Classified

   One lot of Tournier Perform Reversed Lateralized Baseplates were found to have been manufactured with 6mm spacers instead of 3mm spacers. This nonconformance prevents the central screw from being able to thread into the baseplate.

   Z-0113-2024 · Root cause: Process change control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported Tornier Perform Reversed Augmented Glenoid problems

Tornier Perform Reversed Augmented Glenoid models

8 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.

• Tornier Perform® Reversed Augmented Glenoid DWJ502

  PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
  1 recall32 reports
• Tornier Perform® Reversed Augmented Glenoid DWJ505

  shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration
  49 reports
• Tornier Perform® Reversed Augmented Glenoid DWJ515

  PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
  23 reports
• Tornier Perform® Reversed Augmented Glenoid DWJ512

  shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration
  6 reports
• Tornier Perform® Reversed Augmented Glenoid DWJ504

  PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
  6 reports
• Tornier Perform® Reversed Augmented Glenoid DWJ514

  PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
  3 reports
• Tornier Perform® Reversed Augmented Glenoid DWJ513

  PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
  1 report
• Tornier Perform® Reversed Augmented Glenoid DWJ503

  PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
  1 report

Recent Tornier Perform Reversed Augmented Glenoid adverse event reports

The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjurySep 18, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 50820935 ↗
• InjurySep 17, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  The manufacturer received a report from the National Joint Registry that contains unpublished collected data on the usage and the outcomes of the shoulder joint replacement. The report details analysis provided for revision procedures performed until (b)(6) 2026.During the review of the report, it was identified that on (b)(6) 2026 a patient required revision surgery due to infection & lysis- glenoid, which was not previously reported to the manufacturer.

  Patient problems: Osteolysis; Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 50803905 ↗
• InjurySep 16, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  As reported: "Patient has re-presented to surgeon, following revision shoulder arthroplasty in(b)(6)2026. Significant swelling and redness over wound, pain on movement. Wound re-opened, and surgeon concluded that the prosthetic joint was now infected. Decided to remove all prosthesis, as stage 1 of a 2-stage revision. Glenoid component was found to be very loose, easily removed as 1 x construct (revised at previous revision). Humeral component (not revised at previous revision) was found to be extremely well fixed. Humeral poly insert removed - significant wear noted (only been insitu since (b)(6)2026 revision). Proximal humeral vertical osteotomy was required to loosen and to break the bone / implant ongrowth. Stem eventually removed; osteotomy cabled back together with Nice Loops. Multiple tissue specimens collected; debridement; copious lavage attended; no antibiotic spacer implanted - gleno-humeral joint left dis-articulated.Plan - antibiotic regime until clinical markers indicate no infection, then the 2nd stage revision will be undertaken, using a "Custom Glenoid", to be manufactured by a competitor company."

  Patient problems: Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 50791167 ↗
• InjuryAug 7, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  It was reported that the patient underwent a revision procedure due to a suspected infection and dislocation of the implant.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Post Operative Wound Infection

  MAUDE report 50177247 ↗
• InjuryJun 24, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  REVISION OF ASCEND FLEX REVERSE STEM WITH PERFORM REVERSED GLENOID DUE TO INFECTION

  Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection

  MAUDE report 25604389 ↗
• InjuryMay 29, 2026Loss of Osseointegration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Osseointegration Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A RIGHT PRIMARY REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY. AT APPROXIMATELY TWO-YEAR FOLLOW-UP, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH SHOULDER PAIN AND REDUCED RANGE OF MOTION. THE SURGEON NOTED REPORTED NON-COMPLIANCE WITH POSTOPERATIVE REHABILITATION AND A HISTORY OF POTENTIAL TRAUMA WHILE CLIMBING IN AND OUT OF A TRUCK. DURING REVISION SURGERY, THE GLENOID COMPONENT WAS FOUND TO BE LOOSE AND DISSOCIATED FROM THE GLENOID BONE AND WAS EASILY REMOVED. THE HUMERAL COMPONENT REMAINED WELL FIXED AND WAS RETAINED. THE POLYETHYLENE INSERT EXHIBITED ECCENTRIC WEAR, AND GREY SYNOVIAL TISSUE WAS OBSERVED AND EXCISED. COPIOUS LAVAGE WAS PERFORMED. NEW GLENOID COMPONENTS WERE IMPLANTED WITH THE ADDITION OF SYNTHETIC BONE GRAFT. A NEW HUMERAL POLYETHYLENE INSERT WAS PLACED. THE SHOULDER WAS REDUCED AND FOUND TO BE STABLE THROUGH RANGE OF MOTION.

  Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Loss of Range of Motion; Pain

  MAUDE report 25331633 ↗
• InjuryMay 20, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PROVIDED IN MONTHLY REPORT OF (B)(6) 2026 DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 25229665 ↗
• InjuryMay 20, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION FOR THE MONTHLY REPORT OF (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 25229277 ↗
• InjuryMay 18, 2026Fracture

  THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN (B)(6) 2025 - (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE/IMPLANT FRACTURE, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.

  Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

  MAUDE report 25198405 ↗
• InjuryApr 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE CLAIMANT ALLEGES SHE SUSTAINED INJURIES DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 25050675 ↗
• MalfunctionMar 23, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  THE LOCKING OLIVE OF THE BASEPLATE WAS DISLODGED. THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO PUT LOCKING OLIVE BACK IN PLACE. AS A RESULT, A NEW BASEPLATE HAD TO BE OPENED WHICH CAUSED A 10 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 24669040 ↗
• InjuryMar 10, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 24556884 ↗
• InjuryMar 10, 2026Unstable

  THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INSTABILITY, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.

  Patient problems: Joint Laxity

  MAUDE report 24556759 ↗
• InjuryMar 2, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY. PATIENT HAD SHOWN SIGNS OF INFECTION AND WAS DRAINING FROM THE HEALED INCISION SITE. NO INSTABILITY WAS REPORTED OR OBSERVED. CULTURES WERE PERFORMED INTRAOPERATIVELY. THE PATIENTS 3YR OLD WOUND WAS DRAINING FOR THE LAST 3-4 WEEKS AND THE DOCTOR DECIDED TO REMOVE ALL THE IMPLANTS AND IMPLANT AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER.

  Patient problems: Fluid Discharge; Post Operative Wound Infection

  MAUDE report 24482306 ↗
• InjuryFeb 24, 2026Unstable

  THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER JOINT REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INSTABILITY WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER.

  Patient problems: Joint Laxity

  MAUDE report 24428899 ↗

Other Tornier, Inc. products

• Tornier Perform Reversed Glenoid41 models · 515 reports · 1 recall
• Tornier Perform40 models · 290 reports · 1 recall
• TORNIER PERFORM HUMERAL SYSTEM68 models · 190 reports · 1 recall
• Tornier HRS40 models · 176 reports · 1 recall
• AEQUALIS FLEX REVIVE24 models · 70 reports · 2 recalls
• Latitude - Elbow35 models · 147 reports
• Tornier Latitude7 models · 14 reports · 1 recall
• Latitude EV24 models · 56 reports