Skip to content

Invictus 19000-55-30Recalls & reported problems

Alphatec Spine, Inc. · POLYAXIAL SCREW, 5.5mm X 30mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Invictus (96)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00190376303697), received between Feb 20, 2023 and Oct 25, 2024 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 2 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Material Separation2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 25, 2024Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A POSTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION PROCEDURE AT C2-T3. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE INSERTING THE POLYAXIAL SCREW AT T1, IT BROKE AT THE TRANSITION PORTION OF THE SHANK BETWEEN THE TREADS AND TULIP HEAD. THE BROKEN SCREW SHANK WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THIS CAUSED GREATER THAN 30 MINUTES OF A DELAY IN SURGERY. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 2.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20539053 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 25, 2024Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT A POSTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION PROCEDURE AT C2-T3. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE INSERTING THE POLYAXIAL SCREW AT C2, IT BROKE AT THE TRANSITION PORTION OF THE SHANK BETWEEN THE TREADS AND TULIP HEAD. THE BROKEN SCREW SHANK WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THIS CAUSED GREATER THAN 30 MINUTES OF A DELAY IN SURGERY. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 2.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20535977 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 20, 2023Break; Break

    ON (B)(6) 2023, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A POSTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION PROCEDURE. DURING SCREW INSERTION, THE RATCHETING HANDLES WERE TORQUING OUT AND WOULD NOT FULLY DRIVE THE SCREW IN. THE POLYAXIAL SCREW BROKE JUST BELOW THE TULIP. ALL THE PIECES WERE RETRIEVED, AND A NEW SCREW WAS INSERTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16402168 ↗

Other Posterior cervical screw system devices

All Posterior cervical screw system devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page