OASYS 48551000Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · BLOCKER · Class 2 · Implant
All models of OASYS (60)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Stryker OASYS blocker is a screw used to hold the neck spine in place during fusion surgery. The 45 reports mostly describe the screws shifting out of position after implantation, along with breakage, cracking, and bent or torn metal, sometimes requiring a second operation to remove them. There were 23 injuries and no deaths. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 45
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 23
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 45 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540371508), received between Apr 25, 2016 and Jan 16, 2024 — classified as 23 injuries, 22 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (33 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration33
- Fracture5
- Break4
- Material Deformation4
- Torn Material4
- Device Slipped3
- Material Integrity Problem3
- Unintended Movement3
Patient problems
- Injury15
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient13
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions10
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient6
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties2
- Headache2
- Insufficient Information2
- Neck Pain2
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 45 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 16, 2024Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 2 WEEKS AFTER IMPLANTATION TO ADDRESS THE MIGRATION OF FOUR OASYS BLOCKERS. FROM THE IMAGING PROVIDED, IT WAS ALSO OBSERVED THAT A TULIP OF ONE UNKNOWN OASYS SCREW HAS DISENGAGED. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE SECOND OF FOUR BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18519835 ↗InjuryJan 16, 2024Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 2 WEEKS AFTER IMPLANTATION TO ADDRESS THE MIGRATION OF FOUR OASYS BLOCKERS. FROM THE IMAGING PROVIDED, IT WAS ALSO OBSERVED THAT A TULIP OF ONE UNKNOWN OASYS SCREW HAS DISENGAGED. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE THIRD OF FOUR BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18518565 ↗InjuryJan 16, 2024Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 2 WEEKS AFTER IMPLANTATION TO ADDRESS THE MIGRATION OF FOUR OASYS BLOCKERS. FROM THE IMAGING PROVIDED, IT WAS ALSO OBSERVED THAT A TULIP OF ONE UNKNOWN OASYS SCREW HAS DISENGAGED. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE FOURTH OF FOUR BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18518561 ↗InjuryJan 16, 2024Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 2 WEEKS AFTER IMPLANTATION TO ADDRESS THE MIGRATION OF FOUR OASYS BLOCKERS. FROM THE IMAGING PROVIDED, IT WAS ALSO OBSERVED THAT A TULIP OF ONE UNKNOWN OASYS SCREW HAS DISENGAGED. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE FIRST OF FOUR BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18518556 ↗InjuryJun 23, 2023Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY ONE-MONTH POST-OPERATIVELY ONE OASYS BLOCKER ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF C2 MIGRATED. REVISION SURGERY HAS BEEN PLANNED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17195061 ↗MalfunctionOct 1, 2021Migration; Migration
THIS RECORD CAPTURES A REVIEW OF LITERATURE ARTICLE "MECHANICAL IMPLANT FAILURE IN POSTERIOR CERVICAL SPINE FUSION" FROM THE EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL. THE AIM OF THIS STUDY WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE RECENT REFINEMENT AND DOWNSIZING OF THE IMPLANTS FOR POSTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION INCREASE THE OCCURRENCE OF IMPLANT FAILURE. ONE HUNDRED FORTY-TWO CONSECUTIVE CASES OF CERVICAL FUSION DURING A 12-YEAR PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1998 TO DECEMBER 2009, USING EITHER CANNULATED MAGERL SCREWS OR A MULTIAXIAL PEDICLE SCREW¿ROD SYSTEM, WERE REVIEWED RETROSPECTIVELY AFTER AN AVERAGE FOLLOW-UP PERIOD OF MORE THAN 3 YEARS, AND THE RATE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FAILURE OF THESE IMPLANTS WERE EVALUATED. FORTY ONE PATIENTS WERE IMPLANTED WITH OASYS IMPLANTS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT 5 EXPERIENCED AN OASYS "SCREW DISASSEMBLY" AT C7 1 MONTH POST-OPERATIVELY. SPECIFICALLY, THE OASYS BLOCKER MIGRATED FROM IT'S RESPECTIVE SCREW AS EVIDENT FROM X-RAY IMAGING. REVISION SURGERY WAS NOT PERFORMED AS THE PATIENT REMAINED ASYMPTOMATIC.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12562713 ↗MalfunctionOct 1, 2021Migration; Migration
THIS RECORD CAPTURES A REVIEW OF LITERATURE ARTICLE "MECHANICAL IMPLANT FAILURE IN POSTERIOR CERVICAL SPINE FUSION" FROM THE EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL. THE AIM OF THIS STUDY WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE RECENT REFINEMENT AND DOWNSIZING OF THE IMPLANTS FOR POSTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION INCREASE THE OCCURRENCE OF IMPLANT FAILURE. ONE HUNDRED FORTY-TWO CONSECUTIVE CASES OF CERVICAL FUSION DURING A 12-YEAR PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1998 TO DECEMBER 2009, USING EITHER CANNULATED MAGERL SCREWS OR A MULTIAXIAL PEDICLE SCREW¿ROD SYSTEM, WERE REVIEWED RETROSPECTIVELY AFTER AN AVERAGE FOLLOW-UP PERIOD OF MORE THAN 3 YEARS, AND THE RATE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FAILURE OF THESE IMPLANTS WERE EVALUATED. FORTY ONE PATIENTS WERE IMPLANTED WITH OASYS IMPLANTS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT 6 EXPERIENCED AN OASYS "SCREW DISASSEMBLY" AT LEFT TH2 6 MONTHS POST-OPERATIVELY. SPECIFICALLY, THE OASYS BLOCKER MIGRATED FROM IT'S RESPECTIVE SCREW AS EVIDENT FROM X-RAY IMAGING. THE PATIENT THEN REPORTED A "CLATTERY NOISE" IN THEIR NECK 5 MONTHS AFTER THE IMPLANT FAILURE. AN X-RAY SHOWED SUBSEQUENT BREAKAGE OF THE BILATERAL OCCIPITAL PLATE. REVISION SURGERY WAS NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE HER SYMPTOMS WERE MILD. THIS REPORT CA
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12562660 ↗InjurySep 24, 2021Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT RECEIVED REVISION SURGERY TO EXPLANT 2 OASYS BLOCKERS AND 2 RODS WHICH HAD MIGRATED POST-OPERATIVELY FROM AN OCCIPITAL PLATE. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE SECOND OF THE TWO BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12529810 ↗InjurySep 24, 2021Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT RECEIVED REVISION SURGERY TO EXPLANT 2 OASYS BLOCKERS AND 2 RODS WHICH HAD MIGRATED POST-OPERATIVELY FROM AN OCCIPITAL PLATE. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE FIRST OF THE TWO BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12529643 ↗InjurySep 17, 2021Migration; Migration
THE ARTICLE 'ROD MIGRATION TO THE THORACIC SUBARACHNOID SPACE AFTER C1¿2 INSTRUMENTATION: A CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW' IN ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, VOLUME 9 (129-132) 2017, WAS REVIEWED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS TWO MIGRATED OASYS BLOCKERS AND ONE MIGRATED OASYS ROD. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT WITH SPASTIC TETRAPARESIS AS A SEQUEL TO PEDIATRIC MENINGITIS. THEY HAD NO HISTORY OF ADDITIONAL SYSTEMIC DISEASE. AFTER HAVING BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH C1-C2 CERVICAL SUBLUXATION AND MYELOMALACIA USING CERVICAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI), THE PATIENT UNDERWENT LAMINECTOMY OF C1, AND THE C1 LATERAL MASS AND C2 WERE FIXED USING BILATERAL OASYS PEDICULAR SCREWS ON 20 JUNE 2011. POSTOPERATIVELY THE PATIENT'S COMPLAINTS WERE RESOLVED AND NO RADIOLOGICAL OR ADDITIONAL NEUROLOGICAL FINDINGS WERE IDENTIFIED DURING THEIR FOLLOW-UP PERIOD. AT THE END OF THE THIRD POST-OPERATIVE YEAR, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH COMPLAINTS OF HEADACHE, NECK PAIN AND WALKING DIFFICULTY. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION REVEALED TETRAPARESIS WITH 4/5 MUSCLE STRENGTH. THERE WAS NO HISTORY OF TRAUMA DURING THAT PERIOD. ON THE RADIOLOGICAL EVALUATION, THE LEFT ROD WAS NOT DET
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Headache; Neck Pain
MAUDE report 12487553 ↗InjurySep 16, 2021Migration; Migration
THE ARTICLE 'ROD MIGRATION TO THE THORACIC SUBARACHNOID SPACE AFTER C12 INSTRUMENTATION: A CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW' IN ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, VOLUME 9 (129-132) 2017, WAS REVIEWED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS TWO MIGRATED OASYS BLOCKERS AND ONE MIGRATED OASYS ROD. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT WITH SPASTIC TETRAPARESIS AS A SEQUEL TO PEDIATRIC MENINGITIS. THEY HAD NO HISTORY OF ADDITIONAL SYSTEMIC DISEASE. AFTER HAVING BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH C1-C2 CERVICAL SUBLUXATION AND MYELOMALACIA USING CERVICAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI), THE PATIENT UNDERWENT LAMINECTOMY OF C1, AND THE C1 LATERAL MASS AND C2 WERE FIXED USING BILATERAL OASYS PEDICULAR SCREWS ON (B)(6) 2011. POSTOPERATIVELY THE PATIENT'S COMPLAINTS WERE RESOLVED AND NO RADIOLOGICAL OR ADDITIONAL NEUROLOGICAL FINDINGS WERE IDENTIFIED DURING THEIR FOLLOW-UP PERIOD. AT THE END OF THE THIRD POST-OPERATIVE YEAR, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH COMPLAINTS OF HEADACHE, NECK PAIN AND WALKING DIFFICULTY. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION REVEALED TETRAPARESIS WITH 4/5 MUSCLE STRENGTH. THERE WAS NO HISTORY OF TRAUMA DURING THAT PERIOD. ON THE RADIOLOGICAL EVALUATION, THE LEFT ROD WAS NOT DETE
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Headache; Neck Pain
MAUDE report 12485478 ↗MalfunctionMay 3, 2021Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN OASYS SET SCREW MIGRATED POST-OPERATIVELY. THE SURGEON HAS NO PLAN TO REVISE THE PATIENT AND WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR THEM INSTEAD.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11761033 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2020Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN OASYS BLOCKER WAS OBSERVED TO BE STRIPPED ON AN MRI ONE YEAR POST-OPERATIVELY. REVISION SURGERY HAS OCCURRED AND THE BLOCKER HAS BEEN REMOVED.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 10283337 ↗InjuryJun 26, 2020Migration; Migration
UPON PRODUCT RETURN, 8 ADDITIONAL OASYS BLOCKERS WERE RECEIVED AND REVIEWED. AFTER INSPECTION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE BLOCKERS SHOWED SIGNS OF UNDER TIGHTENING INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND MOST LIKELY HAD CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EVENTS CAPTURED IN 0009617544-2020-00035 AND 0009617544-2020-00036. THIS REPORT REPRESENTS THE EIGHTH OF EIGHT BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 10202443 ↗InjuryJun 26, 2020Migration; Migration
UPON PRODUCT RETURN, 8 ADDITIONAL OASYS BLOCKERS WERE RECEIVED AND REVIEWED. AFTER INSPECTION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE BLOCKERS SHOWED SIGNS OF UNDER TIGHTENING INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND MOST LIKELY HAD CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EVENTS CAPTURED IN 0009617544-2020-00035 AND 0009617544-2020-00036. THIS REPORT REPRESENTS THE SEVENTH OF EIGHT BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 10202322 ↗InjuryJun 26, 2020Migration; Migration
UPON PRODUCT RETURN, 8 ADDITIONAL OASYS BLOCKERS WERE RECEIVED AND REVIEWED. AFTER INSPECTION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE BLOCKERS SHOWED SIGNS OF UNDER TIGHTENING INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND MOST LIKELY HAD CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EVENTS CAPTURED IN 0009617544-2020-00035 AND 0009617544-2020-00036. THIS REPORT REPRESENTS THE SIXTH OF EIGHT BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 10202316 ↗InjuryJun 26, 2020Migration; Migration
UPON PRODUCT RETURN, 8 ADDITIONAL OASYS BLOCKERS WERE RECEIVED AND REVIEWED. AFTER INSPECTION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE BLOCKERS SHOWED SIGNS OF UNDER TIGHTENING INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND MOST LIKELY HAD CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EVENTS CAPTURED IN 0009617544-2020-00035 AND 0009617544-2020-00036. THIS REPORT REPRESENTS THE FIFTH OF EIGHT BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 10202314 ↗InjuryJun 26, 2020Migration; Migration
UPON PRODUCT RETURN, 8 ADDITIONAL OASYS BLOCKERS WERE RECEIVED AND REVIEWED. AFTER INSPECTION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE BLOCKERS SHOWED SIGNS OF UNDER TIGHTENING INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND MOST LIKELY HAD CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EVENTS CAPTURED IN 0009617544-2020-00035 AND 0009617544-2020-00036. THIS REPORT REPRESENTS THE FOURTH OF EIGHT BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 10201518 ↗InjuryJun 24, 2020Migration; Migration
UPON PRODUCT RETURN, 3 ADDITIONAL OASYS BLOCKERS WERE RECEIVED AND REVIEWED. AFTER INSPECTION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE BLOCKERS SHOWED SIGNS OF UNDER TIGHTENING INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND MOST LIKELY HAD CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EVENTS CAPTURED IN 0009617544-2020-00035 AND 0009617544-2020-00036. THIS REPORT REPRESENTS THE THIRD OF THREE BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 10190021 ↗InjuryJun 24, 2020Migration; Migration
UPON PRODUCT RETURN, 3 ADDITIONAL OASYS BLOCKERS WERE RECEIVED AND REVIEWED. AFTER INSPECTION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE BLOCKERS SHOWED SIGNS OF UNDER TIGHTENING INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND MOST LIKELY HAD CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EVENTS CAPTURED IN 0009617544-2020-00035 AND 0009617544-2020-00036. THIS REPORT REPRESENTS THE SECOND OF THREE BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 10190005 ↗InjuryMar 9, 2020Migration; Migration
UPON PRODUCT RETURN, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE BLOCKER SHOWED SIGNS OF UNDER TIGHTENING INTRA-OPERATIVELY AND MOST LIKELY HAD CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EVENTS CAPTURED IN 0009617544-2020-00035 AND 0009617544-2020-00036. THIS REPORT REPRESENTS THE FIRST OF THREE BLOCKERS.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 9808684 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2020Fracture; Migration; Fracture; Migration
A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT AN OASYS BLOCKER FAILED POST-OPERATIVELY AS SEEN ON X-RAY IMAGING. THE BLOCKER DISENGAGED FROM ITS RESPECTIVE SCREWS. NO REVISION IS PLANNED AT THIS TIME. THIS RECORD REPRESENTS BLOCKER 5 OF 5.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9678434 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2020Fracture; Migration; Fracture; Migration
A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT AN OASYS BLOCKER FAILED POST-OPERATIVELY AS SEEN ON X-RAY IMAGING. THE BLOCKER DISENGAGED FROM ITS RESPECTIVE SCREWS. NO REVISION IS PLANNED AT THIS TIME. THIS RECORD REPRESENTS BLOCKER 4 OF 5.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9678433 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2020Fracture; Migration; Fracture; Migration
A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT AN OASYS BLOCKER CONSTRUCT FAILED POST-OPERATIVELY AS SEEN ON X- RAY IMAGING. REVISION SURGERY HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED. THIS RECORD REPRESENTS PART 2 OF 5.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9678428 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2020Fracture; Migration; Fracture; Migration
A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT AN OASYS BLOCKER FAILED POST-OPERATIVELY AS SEEN ON X-RAY IMAGING. THE BLOCKER DISENGAGED FROM ITS RESPECTIVE SCREWS. NO REVISION IS PLANNED AT THIS TIME. THIS RECORD REPRESENTS BLOCKER 3 OF 5.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9678427 ↗
Other Orthosis, cervical pedicle screw spinal fixation devices
- INFINITY™ Occipitocervical Upper Thoracic System 3604026Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Orthosis, cervical pedicle screw spinal fixation2 recalls1 report
- CONNECTOR 79-2003Orthofix US LLC · Posterior cervical screw system1 recall0 reports
- INFINITY™ Occipitocervical Upper Thoracic System 360PT4022Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Orthosis, cervical pedicle screw spinal fixation1 recall0 reports
- CONNECTOR 79-2002Orthofix US LLC · Posterior cervical screw system1 recall0 reports
- INFINITY™ Occipitocervical Upper Thoracic System 3604532Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Orthosis, cervical pedicle screw spinal fixation1 recall0 reports
- INFINITY™ Occipitocervical Upper Thoracic System 3604024Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Orthosis, cervical pedicle screw spinal fixation1 recall0 reports
- YUKON OCT Spinal System 7601-05030VB Spine LLC · Orthosis, cervical pedicle screw spinal fixation15 reports
- SYMPHONY 1020-35-112Medos International Sàrl · Posterior cervical screw system6 deaths15 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page