iN∫X ® 0015811Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 39 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00190790001339), received between Feb 25, 2019 and Apr 1, 2026 — classified as 16 injuries, 23 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unintended Movement” (25 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 39 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryApr 1, 2026Unintended Movement

  THE END USER REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING A PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE ON THE STRETCHER, AFTER THE LEGS WERE EXTENDED TO THE GROUND AND THE LOAD END OPERATOR RELEASED THE SAFETY BAIL, ONE OF THE STRETCHER LEGS "BROKE" RESULTING IN UNINTENDED MOVEMENT OF THE STRETCHER. THE PATIENT WAS NOT INJURED; HOWEVER, THE MEDIC'S ARM WAS PINNED BETWEEN THE STRETCHER AND THE BACK OF THE AMBULANCE. THE MEDIC SOUGHT MEDICAL EVALUATION AND THE RESULTING INJURY WAS A BRUISE AND THE MEDIC WAS RELEASED BACK TO WORK. AN EVALUATION OF THE STRETCHER HAS BEEN INITIATED.

  Patient problems: Bruise/Contusion

  MAUDE report 24756717 ↗
• MalfunctionFeb 25, 2026Unintended Movement

  THE END USER REPORTED WHILE LOADING A PATIENT INTO THE AMBULANCE, THE CREW WAS HAVING DIFFICULTIES LOCKING THE STRETCHER INTO THE FASTENER. IT WAS DECIDED TO UNLOAD THE STRETCHER FROM THE AMBULANCE TO BETTER ASSESS THE SITUATION. AFTER LOWERING BOTH SETS OF LEGS TO THE GROUND AND RELEASING THE STRETCHER FROM THE SAFETY BAIL, THE HEAD END OF THE STRETCHER LOWERED UNEXPECTEDLY. THE STRETCHER WAS THEN LOWERED TO ITS LOWEST POSITION AND THE PATIENT WAS ASSESSED. THE PATIENT WAS NOT INJURED AS A RESULT; HOWEVER, A BACKUP AMBULANCE WAS CALLED TO COMPLETE THE TRANSPORT ON ANOTHER STRETCHER. AFTERWARD IT WAS DISCOVERED THE MANUAL RELEASE CABLE HAD COME LOOSE AND WAS BEING PINCHED BY THE ACTUATOR MOVEMENT RESULTING IN THE UNINTENDED MOVEMENT AND INHIBITING THE ABILITY OF THE LEGS TO FULLY RETRACT FOR LOCKING INTO THE FASTENER. A VIDEO CONFERENCE WAS HELD WITH MANUFACTURER'S TECHNICAL SUPPORT TEAM AND THE REPORTED ISSUE WAS CONFIRMED. THE TECHNICAL SUPPORT TEAM PROVIDED INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PROPERLY ROUTE THE MANUAL RELEASE CABLE TO KEEP IT FROM PUSHING INTO THE ACTUATOR DURING OPERATION. A REPLACEMENT MANUAL RELEASE CABLE WAS PROVIDED TO THE CUSTOMER.

  Patient problems: Emotional Changes

  MAUDE report 24446539 ↗
• MalfunctionNov 26, 2025Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  THE END USER REPORTED A PATIENT INVOLVED INCIDENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBJECT STRETCHER. IT WAS REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING A PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE, A CREW MEMBER BEGAN PULLING THE STRETCHER FROM THE AMBULANCE PRIOR TO THE SECOND MEDIC BEING READY. THE HEAD END LEGS WERE NOT FULLY EXTENDED TO THE GROUND AND THE STRETCHER LOWERED FROM THE AMBULANCE. THE PATIENT DID NOT REPORT ANY INJURIES AS A RESULT. THE STRETCHER WAS INSPECTED BY THE END USER AND WAS FOUND TO BE OPERATIONAL AND WAS NOT DAMAGED FROM THE INCIDENT. THE STRETCHER WAS THEN RETURNED TO SERVICE. THE CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THIS INCIDENT WAS UNINTENDED USE ERROR.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 23658971 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 12, 2025Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE PREPARING TO LOAD THE STRETCHER AND PATIENT INTO THE AMBULANCE, THE STRETCHER TIPPED TO THE SIDE. IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT WAS INJURED; HOWEVER, DETAILS OF THE ALLEGED INJURY AND ANY NEEDED MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS NOT PROVIDED. FURTHERMORE, NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS WERE PROVIDED ABOUT THE INCIDENT. THE STRETCHER WAS REMOVED FROM SERVICE PENDING EVALUATION. AN AUTHORIZED FIELD TECHNICIAN WAS DISPATCHED TO CONDUCT A VISUAL AND FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION OF THE STRETCHER AND THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF EQUIPMENT FAILURE THAT WOULD HAVE CAUSED THE INCIDENT NOR WAS THERE ANY EVIDENCE OF EQUIPMENT DAMAGE FROM THE TIP. THIS INCIDENT OCCURRED IN CANADA.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 22786277 ↗
• InjuryJul 8, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE LOADING THE STRETCHER INTO THE AMBULANCE VIA MANUAL MODE, DUE TO A DEAD BATTERY, ONE OF THE MEDIC'S GOT THEIR HAND CAUGHT BETWEEN THE STRETCHER FRAME AND LEGS RESULTING IN A SOFT TISSUE INJURY. THE MEDIC SOUGHT MEDICAL TREATMENT AND REQUIRED TIME OFF WORK; HOWEVER, FOLLOWUP DETAILS OF THE INJURY WERE NOT PROVIDED. THIS INCIDENT OCCURRED IN CANADA. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY OR ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PATIENT. THE END USER FURTHER ADVISED THEIR INTERNAL INVESTIGATION RESULTED IN A FINDING OF UNINTENDED USE ERROR. AN AUTHORIZED SERVICE TECHNICIAN DID EVALUATE THE STRETCHER AND BATTERY AND BOTH WERE FOUND TO BE FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED AND NO REPAIRS WERE REQUIRED.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Tissue Injury

  MAUDE report 22438957 ↗
• InjuryJul 2, 2025Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED AFTER UNLOADING AN EMERGENT PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE AT THE HOSPITAL, THE BUTTONS DID NOT FUNCTION TO LOWER THE STRETCHER TO A LOWERED TRANSPORT HEIGHT. AT THE TIME A MEDIC WAS ON THE STRETCHER WITH THE PATIENT PERFORMING CHEST COMPRESSIONS. THE CREW BEGAN TURNING THE STRETCHER, WITH THE MEDIC AND PATIENT, AT THE LOADING HEIGHT AND THE WEIGHT OF THE STRETCHER BEGAN SHIFTING TO THE PATIENTS RIGHT AND THE STRETCHER TIPPED TO THE GROUND. THE MEDIC DID NOT REPORT ANY INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE TIP. THE PATIENT REMAINED RESTRAINED TO THE STRETCHER BUT WAS OBSERVED TO HAVE SUSTAINED A LACERATION ABOVE THE LEFT EYE. THE PATIENT WAS REMOVED FROM THE STRETCHER RESTRAINTS AND CHEST COMPRESSIONS RESUMED UNTIL HOSPITAL STAFF TOOK OVER THE PATIENT CARE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON THE OUTCOME OF THE PATIENT.

  Patient problems: Laceration(s)

  MAUDE report 22388376 ↗
• MalfunctionMay 21, 2025Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE ATTEMPTING TO LOAD A PATIENT INTO THE AMBULANCE, THE STRETCHER LOST POWER AND THE MANUAL RELEASE WAS ALSO NOT ABLE TO BE UTILIZED. A BACK UP UNIT WAS CALLED TO COMPLETE THE PATIENT TRANSPORT. AFTERWARD, THE SUBJECT STRETCHER BEGAN WORKING PROPERLY AGAIN. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF INJURY OR ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REPORTED ISSUE.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 22061095 ↗
• MalfunctionMay 8, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

  IT WAS REPORTED A TRANSPORT WHEEL DETACHED FROM THE STRETCHER DURING A PATIENT TRANSPORT. THE END USER REPORTED THERE WERE NO INJURIES AS A RESULT OF THE REPORTED ISSUE; HOWEVER, ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF THE INCIDENT WERE NOT PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 21986055 ↗
• MalfunctionMar 4, 2025Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE PREPARING TO LOAD A PATIENT INTO THE AMBULANCE ONE OF THE STRETCHER WHEELS CONTACTED UNEVEN PAVEMENT WHILE ROTATING THE STRETCHER INTO POSITION AND THE STRETCHER TIPPED OVER AS A RESULT. THE PATIENT REMAINED RESTRAINED TO THE STRETCHER AND THERE WAS NO REPORT OF OBSERVED INJURY. THE STRETCHER WAS RIGHTED AND THE TRANSPORT WAS ABLE TO BE COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION OF PRODUCT MALFUNCTION CONTRIBUTING TO THE INCIDENT. AN AUTHORIZED FIELD SERVICE TECHNICIAN WAS DISPATCHED TO CONDUCT A VISUAL AND FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION OF THE STRETCHER AT THE CUSTOMER'S LOCATION. THERE WAS DAMAGE OBSERVED TO THESTRETCHER'S TELESCOPING HANDLE AS A RESULT OF THE INCIDENT. THE STRETCHER WAS REPAIRED AND RETURNED TO SERVICE.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 21517870 ↗
• MalfunctionJul 18, 2024Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING A PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE THE STRETCHER LEGS WOULD ALLEGEDLY NOT EXTEND. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER STRETCHER TO CONTINUE THE TRANSPORT. NO INJURY OR ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT OR MEDIC CREW WAS REPORTED. THE STRETCHER WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. A VISUAL AND FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION WAS CONDUCTED AND THE REPORTED ISSUE COULD NOT BE DUPLICATED. BOTH LEGS WERE FOUND TO BE OPERATING AS INTENDED DURING THE LOADING AND UNLOADING PROCESS. THERE WAS OBSERVED DAMAGE TO THE MANUAL RELEASE CABLE. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THIS CONTRIBUTED TO THE INCIDENT; HOWEVER, AS A PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE, THE MANUAL RELEASE CABLE WAS REPLACED AND THE STRETCHER WAS RETURNED TO THE CUSTOMER.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 19775892 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 13, 2024Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING A PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE, THE STRETCHER ALLEGEDLY DID NOT ENGAGE WITH THE SAFETY HOOK AND THE STRETCHER LOWERED FROM THE AMBULANCE WITH THE PATIENT. AT THIS TIME, THE SERIAL NUMBER OF THE STRETCHER AND ADDITIONAL DETAILS ABOUT THE INCIDENT.HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 19529611 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 30, 2024Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING A PATIENT AT THE HOSPITAL THE STRETCHER BEGAN TO ROLL WITH THE INCLINE OF THE GROUND AND THE SECOND SAFETY BAIL DID NOT ENGAGE WITH THE HOOK RESULTING IN THE HEAD END OF THE STRETCHER LOWERING FROM THE AMBULANCE. THE STRECHER REMAINED UPRIGHT AND THE PATIENT DENIED ANY INJURY AS A RESULT. THE MEDIC CREW WAS ABLE TO RAISE THE STRETCHER TO A LEVEL POSITION AND THE REMAINDER OF THE TRANSPORT WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 19217719 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 30, 2024Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING A PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE THE GUIDE WHEELS ON THE STRETCHER CAME OUT OF THE TRACK AND ROLLED ONTO THE TOP OF THE FASTENER WHICH DID NOT ALLOW THE SECOND SAFETY BAIL TO ENGAGE WITH THE HOOK AND THE HEAD END OF THE STRETCHER LOWERED FROM THE AMBULANCE. THE STRETCHER REMAINED UPRIGHT AND THE PATIENT DENIED ANY INJURY; HOWEVER, A MEDIC DID ALLEGE A HAND INJURY IN THE FORM OF AN ABRASION BUT NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS SOUGHT.

  Patient problems: Abrasion

  MAUDE report 19217718 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 30, 2024Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING A PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE, THE STRETCHER BEGAN FALLING TO THE LEFT SIDE AS IF THE WHEELS ON THE AMBULANCE DECK WERE UNEVEN. THE SECOND RELEASE WAS NOT LIFTED; HOWEVER, THE STRETCHER CONTINUED TIPPING TO THE LEFT AND LOWERED FROM THE AMBULANCE DECK TO THE GROUND. THE PATIENT WAS NOT INJURED BUT DID NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE STRETCHER AND THE TRANSPORT WAS CONTINUED ON ANOTHER STRETCHER. A MEDIC HAS ALLEGED INJURY IN THE FORM OF A HAND SPRAIN AND SOUGHT PHYSICAL THERAPY.

  Patient problems: Muscle/Tendon Damage

  MAUDE report 19217717 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 29, 2024Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  THE END USER REPORTED THE CATCH BAR DID NOT ENGAGE WITH THE HOOK DURING A PATIENT TRANSPORT. THE STRETCHER DID NOT LOWER AND THE PATIENT WAS NOT INJURED; HOWEVER, A MEDIC ALLEGED INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE INCIDENT. DETAILS ON THE NATURE OF THE INJURY WAS NOT PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: Muscle/Tendon Damage

  MAUDE report 19203525 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 2, 2024Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING A PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE AT THE HOSPITAL, THE HEAD END LEGS STOPPED AT THE MID-WAY POINT DURING THE UNLOADING PROCESS. THE MANUAL RELEASE WAS UTILIZED TO FULLY LOWER THE HEAD END LEGS SO THE WHEELS MADE CONTACT WITH THE GROUND. ONCE THE STRETCHER WAS RELEASED FROM THE HOOK, THE HEAD END LEGS ALLEGEDLY LOWERED AND THE STRETCHER TIPPED TO THE SIDE. THE PATIENT WAS ASSESSED AND NO INJURIES WERE ALLEGED AS A RESULT OF THE INCIDENT. THE PATIENT WAS REMOVED FROM THE STRETCHER AND CARE WAS TURNED OVER TO HOSPITAL STAFF. THE STRETCHER WAS REMOVED FROM SERVICE PENDING EVALUATION.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 19019957 ↗
• MalfunctionJan 8, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

  IT WAS ALLEGED WHILE MOVING A PATIENT ON THE STRETCHER TO THE AMBULANCE THE PATIENT RIGHT CONTROL END WHEEL DETACHED FROM THE FORK. THE CREW CEASED THE TRANSPORT AND CALLED ANOTHER AMBULANCE TO CONTINUE THE TRANSPORT ON ANOTHER STRETCHER. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY OR ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT. THE END USER STATED THE THROUGH BOLT HAD LOOSENED ITSELF AND CAME APART RESULTING IN A SMALL AMOUNT OF DAMAGE TO THE WHEEL FORK. IMAGES OF THE SUBJECT WHEEL WERE PROVIDED FOR EVALUATION. A WHEEL REPLACEMENT KIT WAS PROVIDED TO THE END USER FOR REPAIR.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 18466083 ↗
• MalfunctionJan 8, 2024Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

  IT WAS ALLEGED WHILE LOADING A PATIENT INTO THE AMBULANCE THE STRETCHER WOULD NOT LATCH INTO THE FASTENING SYSTEM IN THE AMBULANCE. THE CREW HAD TO HAVE ANOTHER AMBULANCE COME TO THE SCENE, TRANSFER THE PATIENT TO ANOTHER STRETCHER AND CONTINUE THE TRANSPORT. NO INJURY OR ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED AS A RESULT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 18466080 ↗
• MalfunctionDec 5, 2023Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING THE PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE THE MEDIC AT THE HEAD END OF THE STRETCHER ALLEGEDLY RELEASED THE STRETCHER FROM THE SAFETY HOOK PRIOR TO THE FOOT END MEDIC FULLY LOWERING THE HEAD END LEGS AND THE STRETCHER ROLLED OFF THE DECK OF THE AMBULANCE AND TIPPED. THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY SUSTAINED AN ABRASION TO THE LEFT ELBOW AND COMPLAINED OF ARM AND LOWER BACK PAIN. THE PATIENT WAS EVALUATED AT THE HOSPITAL BUT NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 18267917 ↗
• MalfunctionDec 5, 2023Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING A PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE THE FOOT END MEDIC ALLEGEDLY PULLED THE STRETCHER FROM THE AMBULANCE PRIOR TO ENSURING THE HEAD END LEGS WERE FULLY LOWERED AND THE STRETCHER LOWERED FROM AMBULANCE DECK BUT DID NOT TIP. THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF BACK PAIN AS A RESULT AND WAS EVALUATED AT THE HOSPITAL. NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 18267915 ↗
• MalfunctionSep 8, 2023Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING THE STRETCHER FROM THE AMBULANCE, THE PATIENT MADE A SUDDEN MOVE TO THE RIGHT CAUSING THE SAFETY BAIL TO MISS THE HOOK AND THE STRETCHER LOWERED FROM THE AMBULANCE AND TIPPED TO THE RIGHT SIDE. IT WAS ALLEGED THE PATIENT SUSTAINED AN ELBOW AND TOE INJURY AND BOTH OPERATING MEDICS ALLEGED ARM/WRIST INJURY. THE PATIENT AND MEDICS WERE EVALUATED IN THE ER; HOWEVER, NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE PROVIDED ON OUTCOME OR TREATMENT.

  Patient problems: Bruise/Contusion

  MAUDE report 17711769 ↗
• InjuryAug 21, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED AFTER UNLOADING A PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE, THE PATIENT SHIFTED THEIR WEIGHT SUDDENLY AND THE STRETCHER TIPPED OVER TO THE GROUND. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL AS A PRECAUTION BUT WAS NOT INJURED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 17586373 ↗
• InjuryJun 2, 2023Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE A MEDIC WAS LOADING THE EMPTY STRETCHER BACK INTO THE AMBULANCE, THE FOOT END OF THE STRETCHER ALLEGEDLY DROPPED ONTO THEIR FOOT RESULTING IN A BROKEN TOE. THE END USER REPORTED THE STRETCHER WAS EVALUATED AND IT WAS THEIR CONCLUSION THE INCIDENT WAS A RESULT OF USE ERROR.

  Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

  MAUDE report 17049665 ↗
• MalfunctionMar 24, 2023Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING A PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE THE SAFETY BAIL DID NOT ENGAGE WITH THE HOOK AND THE STRETCHER LOWERED TO THE BUMPER AND THEN TIPPED TO THE GROUND. IT WAS DISCOVERED AN OBSTRUCTION WAS COVERING THE SAFETY HOOK WHICH CAUSED THE SAFETY BAIL TO NOT ENGAGE WITH THE HOOK. IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT SUSTAINED INJURY TO THE HEAD AND RIGHT SHOULDER AS A RESULT OF CONTACTING THE GROUND. THE NATURE OF INJURIES WAS DESCRIBED AS LACERATION AND SOFT TISSUE INJURY.

  Patient problems: Laceration(s); Unspecified Tissue Injury

  MAUDE report 16613211 ↗
• MalfunctionMar 2, 2023Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

  IT WAS REPORTED WHILE UNLOADING A PATIENT FROM THE AMBULANCE THE SAFETY BAIL WAS RELEASED PRIOR TO THE HEAD END LEGS BEING LOWERED AND THE STRETCHER LOWERED FROM THE AMBULANCE. THE INCIDENT REPORT ALLEGED PATIENT INJURIES IN THE NATURE OF A LACERATION TO THE HEAD AND A SHOULDER INJURY. BOTH INJURIES REQUIRING MEDICAL INTERVENTION. IT WAS FURTHER ALLEGED ONE OF THE MEDICS SUSTAINED A BLISTER AS A RESULT OF THE INCIDENT REQUIRING FIRST AID AT THE ER.

  Patient problems: Abrasion

  MAUDE report 16471620 ↗