Skip to content

CONSTELLATION® ULTRAVIT® ENGAUGE® 8065751700Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · 27+ ULTRAVIT® Vitrectomy Probe · Class 2

All models of CONSTELLATION ULTRAVIT ENGAUGE (8)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380657517008), received between Aug 17, 2018 and Sep 5, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Cut” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Failure to Cut1
  • Self-Activation or Keying1

Patient problems

  • Intraocular Pressure Decreased1
  • Intraocular Pressure Increased1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Vitreous Hemorrhage1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 5, 2024Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT THE PROBE COULD NOT CUT DURING VITRECTOMY SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED AFTER REPLACING THE PROBE WITH ANOTHER ONE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20143091 ↗
  • InjuryAug 3, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IN LITERATURE STUDY ARTICLE, A NON-HEALTH PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT TO COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF A 27-GAUGE (27G) BEVELED-TIP VITRECTOMY PROBE IN MICROINCISION VITRECTOMY SURGERY (MIVS) WITH A CONVENTIONAL 25-GAUGE (25G) VITRECTOMY PROBE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SERIOUS PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY (PDR). FIFTY-TWO PATIENTS WHO WERE DEFINITIVELY DIAGNOSED WITH PDR AND REQUIRED VITRECTOMY TO REMOVE THE PROLIFERATIVE MEMBRANE. THE PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE WAS THE PRODUCTIVITY OF CUTTING THE MEMBRANE THROUGHOUT THE OPERATION. THE IMPORTANT SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES WERE THE NUMBER OF VITRECTOMY PROBES (VPS) SWITCHED TO MICRO FORCEPS, INTRAOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS, POSTOPERATIVE BEST-CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY (BCVA) AND PREOPERATIVE INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE (IOP) OF PATIENTS DURING THE 6-MONTH FOLLOW-UP PERIOD. COMPARED WITH THE 25G FLAT-TIP VITRECTOMY PROBE, THE 27G BEVELED-TIP VITRECTOMY PROBE CONTRIBUTES TO REMOVING THE PROLIFERATIVE MEMBRANE MORE EFFICIENTLY AND EASILY. IT ALSO REDUCED THE OCCURRENCE OF INTRAOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGES AND THUS AVOIDED EXCESSIVE ELECTROCOAGULATION. IN TERMS OF TREATMENT OUTCOME, THE ADVANCED BEVEL-TIP VITRECTOMY PROBE IS AS EF

    Patient problems: Intraocular Pressure Decreased; Intraocular Pressure Increased; Vitreous Hemorrhage

    MAUDE report 17450547 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 17, 2018Self-Activation or Keying

    STAFF REPORTED THAT A CONSTELLATION 27+ ULTRAVIT HANDPIECE WAS NOT WORKING PROPERLY. THE SURGEON NOTED THAT THE HANDPIECE WAS SUCTIONING WITHOUT THE FOOTPEDAL BEING DEPRESSED. A NEW HANDPIECE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE AS PLANNED AND NO HARM CAME TO THE PATIENT. THE HANDPIECE WAS SAVED FOR CLINICAL ENGINEERING AND WILL BE RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR FAILURE ANALYSIS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7792625 ↗

Other Instrument, vitreous aspiration and cutting, ac-powered devices

All Instrument, vitreous aspiration and cutting, ac-powered devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page