Skip to content

CONSTELLATION HYPERVIT ENGAUGE 8065830027Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CONSTELLATION 27+ HYPERVIT Bevel, Vitrectomy Probe 20,000 cpm · Class 2

All models of CONSTELLATION HYPERVIT ENGAUGE (4)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Alcon Constellation Hypervit vitrectomy probe is a cutting and suction instrument used in eye surgery. The 54 reports mostly describe the probe failing to cut during surgery or losing suction; in most cases surgery was completed the same day with a replacement probe and no patient harm was mentioned. No deaths or injuries were reported, and no recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
55
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 55 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380658300272), received between Nov 3, 2021 and Sep 17, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 54 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Cut” (36 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 2 reportsJan 2024: 2 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 2 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 2 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 3 reportsAug 2025: 6 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 5 reportsDec 2025: 8 reportsJan 2026: 5 reportsFeb 2026: 3 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 2 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 2 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520268
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Cut36
  • Suction Problem12
  • Suction Failure9
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Noise, Audible1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions50
  • Insufficient Information4
  • Retinal Tear1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 55 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 17, 2026Failure to Cut

    A nurse reported that that vitrectomy probe could not cut during vitrectomy surgery. The surgery was completed on same day by replacing it with new product. There was no patient impact.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50797379 ↗
  • InjurySep 4, 2026Failure to Cut

    A physician reported that the vitreous was not being adequately cut. After the cutter was replaced, the issue was resolved. During peripheral retinal examination following vitrectomy, two retinal tears were identified in the inferior peripheral retina. During intraoperative laser treatment, No retinal detachment was observed. Treatment was completed with laser.

    Patient problems: Retinal Tear

    MAUDE report 50613744 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 13, 2026Suction Problem

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50234796 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 26, 2026Failure to Cut

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT VITRECTOMY PROBE DID NOT CUT DURING VITRECTOMY SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT WITH NEW ONE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25632444 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 26, 2026Failure to Cut

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT VITRECTOMY PROBE DID NOT CUT DURING VITRECTOMY SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT WITH NEW ONE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25632443 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2026Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE FAILURE OF CUTTER (CUTTING ISSUE) DURING SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY, BUT IT WAS UNKNOWN HOW THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THE PROCEDURE TYPE WAS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24468410 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2026Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE CUTTER DID NOT ACTUATE AT FIRST. THE CONNECTOR OF CUTTER SLIGHTLY LIFTED FROM THE CONSOLE. WHEN IT WAS PHYSICALLY INSERTED INTO THE CONSOLE, THE CUTTER COULD BE USED. IT WAS UNCLEAR WHETHER THE CUTTER JUST HAPPENED TO WORK AT THAT MOMENT OR WHETHER IT WORKED BECAUSE THE CONNECTOR WAS PUSHED IN DURING THE VITRECTOMY SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY AND THE PRODUCT CONTINUED TO BE USED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24289211 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 6, 2026Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT CUTTER STOPPED MOVING DURING THE VITRECTOMY SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY AFTER REPLACING WITH THE SAME PRODUCT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24275889 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 30, 2026Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT CUTTING COULD NOT BE PERFORMED DURING SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT WITH ANOTHER ONE. THE PROCEDURE TYPE WAS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24223093 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 20, 2026Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT CUTTING FAILURE OCCURRED DURING SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT WITH ANOTHER ONE. THE SURGERY TYPE WAS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24113798 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 20, 2026Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT POOR ACTUATING OF PROBE OCCURRED DURING CATARACT/VITRECTOMY COMBINATION SURGERY. THE CONDITION OF ASPIRATING WAS UNKNOWN. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT WITH ANOTHER ONE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24113796 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 6, 2026Suction Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT ABNORMAL ASPIRATION DURING VITRECTOMY SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY AFTER REPLACING WITH ANOTHER PRODUCT. THERE WAS NO INFORMATION ABOUT PATIENT IMPACT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23973369 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 6, 2026Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT CUTTER DID NOT CUT DURING SURGERY. THE PROCEDURE TYPE WAS UNKNOWN. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED AFTER REPLACING WITH ANOTHER PRODUCT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23972118 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 29, 2025Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT CUTTER DID NOT CUT DURING SURGERY. THE PROCEDURE TYPE WAS UNKNOWN. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT WITH ANOTHER ONE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23904595 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 24, 2025Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT CUTTER COULD NOT CUT BEFORE THE SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY. OTHER SURGERY DETAILS WERE UNKNOWN. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT CONTACTED WITH PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23886859 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 22, 2025Suction Problem; Suction Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT POOR ASPIRATION DURING VITRECTOMY SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT WITH ANOTHER ONE. THERE WAS NO INFORMATION ABOUT PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23861951 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2025Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT CUTTER COULD NOT CUT DURING THE CATARACT AND VITRECTOMY COMBINATION SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY. HOW SURGERY COMPLETED WAS UNKNOWN. THE PRODUCT WAS CONTACTED WITH PATIENT BUT THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23797849 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 5, 2025Suction Problem; Suction Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT POOR ASPIRATION OF CUTTER WAS CONFIRMED DURING THE SURGERY. THE PROCEDURAL TYPE WAS UNKNOWN. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT. THERE WAS NO INFORMATION ABOUT PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23725953 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 4, 2025Suction Problem; Suction Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE ASPIRATION COULD NOT BE USED DURING THE SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY. THE OTHER SURGERY DETAILS WERE UNKNOWN. THE PRODUCT CONTACTED WITH PATIENT, BUT THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23712727 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 1, 2025Suction Problem; Suction Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT VITRECTOMY PROBE HAD POOR ASPIRATION DURING THE CATARACT AND VITRECTOMY COMBINATION SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT WITH ANOTHER ONE. THERE WAS NO INFORMATION ABOUT PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23677865 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 1, 2025Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE PROBE WAS NOT SHARP ENOUGH DURING CATARACT AND VITRECTOMY COMBINATION SURGERY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY AFTER REPLACEMENT OF PRODUCT WITH NEW ONE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23677651 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 28, 2025Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE PROBE WAS NOT SHARP ENOUGH DURING CATARACT AND VITRECTOMY COMBINATION SURGERY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY, BUT THE DETAILS WERE UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23672061 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2025Suction Problem; Suction Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT WHEN PRESSED THE FOOT SWITCH, CUTTER ASPIRATION STOPPED OCCURRED DURING SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY BY REPLACING THE PRODUCT. THE SURGERY TYPE WAS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23493417 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2025Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT ACTUATION AND CUTTING FAILURES OF A PROBE OCCURRED DURING VITRECTOMY SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT WITH ANOTHER ONE. THE CONDITION OF ASPIRATION WAS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23472878 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2025Suction Problem; Suction Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT ASPIRATION FAILURE OF A PROBE OCCURRED DURING CATARACT AND VITRECTOMY COMBINATION SURGERY. A TEST WAS PASSED, HOWEVER, AFTER USING THE PRODUCT FOR A WHILE, ASPIRATION WAS NOT PERFORMED. THE CONDITION OF ACTUATION AND CUTTING WAS UNKNOWN. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED AFTER REPLACING THE PRODUCT WITH ANOTHER ONE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23462089 ↗

Other Vitrectomy, instrument cutter devices

All Vitrectomy, instrument cutter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page