Skip to content

AutoShield Duo 329515Recalls & reported problems

Embecta Medical II, LLC · AutoShield Duo™ Pen Needles, 5mm, 30G, 3bevel, TW · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00383017951535), received between Feb 17, 2026 and Mar 13, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult or Delayed Activation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult or Delayed Activation1
  • Material Protrusion/Extrusion1

Patient problems

  • Needle Stick/Puncture1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 13, 2026

    WHILE ATTEMPTING TO SCREW NEEDLE ONTO THE END OF THE INSULIN PEN, THE SPRING CAME OUT AND DEVICE FELL APART.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24589504 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 17, 2026Difficult or Delayed Activation; Material Protrusion/Extrusion

    MEDWATCH REPORT (B)(4) ATTACHED TO THIS CASE. UNABLE TO OPEN THE REPORT LOT # UNKNOWN CATALOG# UNKNOWN DATE OF EVENT UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME SAMPLE STATUS NO. (B)(6), (B)(6) 2026: AS PER THE ATTACHED REPORT. DESCRIBE THE EVENT OR PROBLEM: RN ADMINISTERING INSULIN SQ [SUB-CUTANEOUS] TO PATIENT. NEEDLE DID NOT SELF-RETRACT. NEEDLE STICK INJURY TO WRITER. WHAT WAS THE ORIGINAL INTENDED PROCEDURE: INJECT INSULIN AND PREVENT STAFF NEEDLE STICK WHAT PROBLEM DID THE USER HAVE: DEVICE FAILED (E.G. BROKE, COULDN'T GET IT TO WORK OR STOPPED WORKING); DEVICE MALFUNCTION - THAT IS, THE DEVICE DID NOT DO WHAT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO DO. VCOYNE (B)(6) 2026 UPDATE/ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM NACC - SEE ATTACHMENTS. LOT # 4311022 EVENT NEEDLE STICK TO STAFF AFTER INJECTING PATIENT. "NEEDLE DID NOT SELF-RETRACT. NEEDLE STICK TO WRITER AFTER INJECTION" MEDWATCH REPORT (B)(4). DESCRIBE THE EVENT OR PROBLEM: RN ADMINISTERING INSULIN SQ [SUB-CUTANEOUS] TO PATIENT. NEEDLE DID NOT SELF-RETRACT. NEEDLE STICK INJURY TO WRITER. WHAT WAS THE ORIGINAL INTENDED PROCEDURE? INJECT INSULIN AND PREVENT STAFF NEEDLE STICK-- WHAT PROBLEM DID THE USER HAVE: DEVICE FAILED (E.G. BROKE, COULDN'T GET IT TO WORK OR STOPPED WORKIN

    Patient problems: Needle Stick/Puncture

    MAUDE report 24366932 ↗

Other Needle, hypodermic, single lumen devices

All Needle, hypodermic, single lumen devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page