Skip to content

NIPRO HYPODERMIC NEEDLE AH+2538Recalls & reported problems

Nipro Medical Corporation · Class 2

All models of NIPRO HYPODERMIC NEEDLE (6)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00383790002080), received between Aug 24, 2020 and May 15, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Material Separation2

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 15, 2026Break; Material Separation

    CUSTOMER REPORTS WHILE THE DOCTOR WAS TAKING A URINE SAMPLE THROUGH CYSTOTOMY, THE NEEDLE DISCONNECTED FROM ITS HUB AND WAS LEFT IN THE ABDOMINAL CAVITY OF A CANINE. THE NEEDLE SEPARATED AFTER ASPIRATION AND REMOVAL FROM THE ABDOMINAL CAVITY. THEY HAD TO SEDATE, TAKE X-RAYS, AND PERFORM SURGERY ON THE CANINE. THE NEEDLE WAS RETRIEVED INTACT. NO COMPLICATIONS AFTER SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 25183491 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2020Break; Material Separation

    DURING A HORMONE PELLETING PROCEDURE, NEEDLE BROKE OFF INTO THE TISSUE OF THE RIGHT BUTTOCK. THE NEEDLE BROKE OFF AT THE BASE NEAR THE PLASTIC TIP. CLINIC IS CONCERNED THE NEEDLE WAS DEFECTIVE AS ROUTINE SURGICAL PROCEDURE WAS FOLLOWED AND THE PROTOCOL WAS FOLLOWED WITH AN EXPERIENCED PROVIDER. THE NEEDLE IS STILL IN THE TISSUE AND THE CLINIC IS ATTEMPTING TO GET AN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGIST TO ASSIST AT THE REMOVAL, AS GENERAL SURGERY WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. 08/05/2020: THE PATIENT EVENTUALLY WAS ABLE TO GET THE NEEDLE REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 10446253 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2020Break; Break

    DURING A HORMONE PELLETING PROCEDURE, NEEDLE BROKE OFF INTO THE TISSUE OF THE RIGHT BUTTOCK. THE NEEDLE BROKE OFF AT THE BASE NEAR THE PLASTIC TIP. CLINIC IS CONCERNED THE NEEDLE WAS DEFECTIVE AS ROUTINE SURGICAL PROCEDURE WAS FOLLOWED AND THE PROTOCOL WAS FOLLOWED WITH AN EXPERIENCED PROVIDER. THE NEEDLE IS STILL IN THE TISSUE AND THE CLINIC IS ATTEMPTING TO GET AN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGIST TO ASSIST AT THE REMOVAL, AS GENERAL SURGERY WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. 08/05/2020: THE PATIENT EVENTUALLY WAS ABLE TO GET THE NEEDLE REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 10446083 ↗

Other Needle, Hypodermic, Single Lumen devices

All Needle, Hypodermic, Single Lumen devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page