DESTINATION RSR01Recalls & reported problems
Terumo Medical Corporation · DESTINATION Renal Guiding Sheath · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Terumo Destination RSR01 renal guiding sheath is a soft tube used to guide catheters into blood vessels. Most of the 56 reports describe the sheath deforming, snapping or unraveling during insertion or removal, sticking in the vessel, or coming apart, with 13 injuries and no deaths; some mention blood loss, a hematoma, or a fragment left in the patient. There are no recalls naming this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 55
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 13
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 55 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00389701006161), received between Apr 26, 2018 and Dec 5, 2025 — classified as 13 injuries, 42 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (13 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Deformation13
- Break9
- Detachment of Device or Device Component7
- Difficult to Insert7
- Difficult to Advance4
- Difficult to Remove4
- Physical Resistance/Sticking4
- Leak/Splash3
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions25
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient16
- Blood Loss6
- Foreign Body In Patient2
- Hematoma2
- No Patient Involvement2
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 55 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 5, 2025Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE REPORTED INFORMATION. DURING A PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAM INTERVENTION, A DESTINATION 6X45CM SHEATH SNAPPED IN HALF AND UNRAVELED IN THE PATIENT WHILE TRYING TO REMOVE THE SHEATH AND DILATOR FROM THE PATIENT. THE VASCULAR SURGEON THEN NEEDED TO PERFORM A CUT DOWN TO REMOVE THE SHEATH. THE BLOOD LOSS WAS LESS THAN 250CC. NO EQUIPMENT OR OTHER DEVICES WERE USED WITH THE DESTINATION DEVICE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 17NOV2025: THE DILATOR DID NOT SNAP IN HALF. THE SHEATH UNRAVELED AND BROKE APART.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23728950 ↗InjuryMar 11, 2025Solder Joint Fracture; Solder Joint Fracture
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THE BREAKAGE OF THE INTRODUCER DURING TRACTION WHILE REMOVING THE MATERIAL. THE PATIENT SUSTAINED NO INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21569682 ↗InjuryNov 29, 2024Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 15 JAN 2025: NO OTHER DEVICE WAS USED WITH METALLIC COILING WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 20808615 ↗MalfunctionNov 15, 2024Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE DILATOR WOULD NOT GO IN THE SHEATH. THE PROCEDURE WAS A PERIPHERAL PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY AND/OR REQUIRE MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20700725 ↗MalfunctionOct 10, 2024Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) VIA FEMORAL ACCESS. PUNCTION WAS PERFORMED BY SELDINGER TECHNIQUE AND INSERTION OF A LUNDERQUIST GUIDE WIRE WAS DONE. WHEN ADVANCING THE RSR01 THE DILATOR ENTERED THE VESSEL WITHOUT RESISTANCE, WHEN ADVANCING THE SHEATH INTO THE VESSEL RESISTANCE WAS FELT. THE TIP OF THE SHEATH SEEMED TO ROLL UP DUE TO THE RESISTANCE. THE PATIENT CONDITION WAS STABLE AND THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 01OCT2024: A 6 FRENCH PROCEDURE SHEATH WAS USED. THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH ARTERIAL ACCESS, SHEATH, GUIDEWIRE, OR CATHETER INSERTION. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF A PRE-DEPLOYMENT ANGIOGRAM WAS PERFORMED. THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH INSERTION, DEPLOYMENT, OR WITHDRAWAL OF THE DEVICE. HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED BY THE ANGIO-SEAL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20417046 ↗MalfunctionOct 3, 2024Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT WHEN THEY WERE REMOVING THE 6FR 45CM DESTINATION SHEATH IT HAD GOT STUCK IN THE PATIENT'S FEMORAL ARTERY. THE PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20360901 ↗InjuryJan 26, 2024Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 08FEB2024: THE PROCEDURE TAKING PLACE WHEN THE LEAKAGE OCCURRED BECAUSE OF VALVE DISCONNECT WAS CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION. THE PATIENT HAD A LOT OF TORTUOSITY WHICH WAS WHY THE DOCTOR CHOSE THE SIZE OF THE DESTINATION (DS) SHEATH HE DID, HOWEVER THEY WERE LEAKING MULTIPLE TIMES, AND A VERY SMALL HEMATOMA OCCURRED DURING THE MULTIPLE EXCHANGES OF DEVICES. THE HEMATOMA WAS RESOLVED WITH MANUAL PRESSURE AND THE PATIENT WAS IN STABLE CONDITION.
Patient problems: Hematoma
MAUDE report 18591546 ↗InjuryJan 26, 2024Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE HUB OF THE DESTINATION SHEATH WOULD NOT TIGHTEN ADEQUATELY AND AS NORMAL AND AS A RESULT LEAKED BLOOD. ANOTHER DESTINATION SHEATH WITH A DIFFERENT LOT NUMBER WAS OPENED BUT WAS ALSO FOUND TO HAVE THE SAME ISSUE. FINALLY, A COMPETITOR DEVICE, MANUFACTURED BY CORDIS, WAS USED WITH SUCCESS. THE DOCTOR STATED THAT THE DEFECTIVE DEVICE CAUSED A HEMATOMA. BLOOD LOSS LESS THAN 250 CCS. THE EVENT OCCURRED INTRA-OPERATIVE. MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS NOT REQUIRED. THERE IS A DIRECT ALLEGATION THAT THE REPORTED DEVICE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO PATIENT INJURY AND/OR NEED FOR MEDICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Hematoma
MAUDE report 18585667 ↗MalfunctionJan 12, 2024Material Frayed; Material Deformation; Material Frayed; Material Deformation
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 17 JAN 2024: THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED FOR THE PATIENT AT THE TIME THE DIFFICULTY WITH DESTINATION OCCURRED WAS PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) CROSSOVER. PROCEDURE SHEATH SIZE USED WAS A 6F. THERE WERE NO DIFFICULTIES WITH ARTERIAL ACCESS, SHEATH, GUIDEWIRE, OR CATHETER INSERTION. AN ANGIOGRAM WAS NOT PERFORMED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BLOOD LOSS. PATIENT CONDITION IS STABLE. NO CONCOMITANT MEDICAL PRODUCTS WERE USED WITH THE INVOLVED DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18508753 ↗MalfunctionAug 18, 2023Material Deformation; Material Deformation
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN INTRODUCED THE DESTINATION SHEATH INTO THE ARTERY AND THE DISTAL TIP OF THE SHEATH GOT DAMAGED. THE PHYSICIAN DOES NOT REMEMBER IF SHE DID A SMALL OF THE SKIN AT THE PUNCTURE SITE. THERE WAS NO SIGNIFICANT LOSS OF BLOOD. A SHORT FEMORAL SHEATH (IK B 6F) WAS USED TO ENLARGE THE PUNCTURE SITE. THEN THE DESTINATION SHEATH WAS USED AND COULD BE PLACED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17571176 ↗InjuryJul 14, 2023Fracture; Difficult to Remove; Fracture; Difficult to Remove
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE DESTINATION SHEATH WAS USED SUCCESSFULLY TO PERFORM A SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) PERIPHERAL INTERVENTION. WHEN FINISHING THE PROCEDURE AND REMOVING THE SHEATH FROM THE PATIENT'S FEMORAL ARTERY THERE WAS RESISTANCE AND THE SHEATH ENDED UP SPLITTING IN TWO. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO REMOVE BOTH PIECES WITH NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE AND DOING FINE WITH NO COMPLICATIONS. THE PROCEDURE OUTCOME WAS SUCCESSFUL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 16JUN2023: THE ANATOMY WAS NOT VERY TORTUOUS; HOWEVER, THEY DID GET RESISTANCE. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO REMOVE THE PIECES WITHOUT SURGICAL INTERVENTION. THE LOCATION OF THE SPLIT ON THE DESTINATION WAS 10 CM PROXIMAL OF THE SHEATH.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17325974 ↗MalfunctionJun 5, 2023Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THEY WERE UNABLE TO MOUNT THE DESTINATION INTRODUCER IN THE ARTERY, THE DILATOR COMES OUT LESS THAN USUAL FROM THE INTRODUCER. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 24MAY2023: THE PROCEDURE WAS A RIGHT ILIAC ANGIOPLASTY AND RIGHT FEMORAL TRIPOD BY CROSSOVER. THE DEVICE DID NOT APPEAR TO BE DAMAGED. THERE WAS NO STENOSIS, PLAQUE, CALCIUM PRESENT AROUND THE INSERTION SITE. THE PATIENT CONDITION WAS STABLE. ANOTHER INTRODUCER OF THE SAME REFERENCE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE AND WAS COMPLIANT. THE PROCEDURE OUTCOME WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS WAS LESS THAN 250CC.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17056677 ↗MalfunctionFeb 2, 2023Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE GUIDING SHEATH OF THE DESTINATION DEVICE INVOLVED LEAKED, AND ALL THE CONTRAST MEDIA CAME OUT. AT THE BEGINNING, THE GUIDING SHEATH WAS OKAY; HOWEVER, AFTER ABOUT THIRTY (30) MINUTES THE USER WAS NOT ABLE TO APPLY CONTRAST MEDIA (CM). SUDDENLY, THERE WAS A HOLE. THROUGH THE HOLE, ABOUT 20 MILLIMETERS (ML) OF CM CAME OUT. THE PATIENT WAS OKAY. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16283092 ↗MalfunctionApr 5, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE WHILE OPENING A 6 FR DESTINATION SHEATH IT HAPPENED THAT THE CCV WITH THE SIDE PORT WAS LOOSE IN THE PACKING. DURING OPENING (OF THE PACKING) IT FELL OUT OF THE PACKING AND ONTO THE FLOOR. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11615650 ↗MalfunctionFeb 5, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT WHEN OPENING THE DESTINATION, THE SIDE PORT WAS NOT DETACHED TO THE SHEATH. AS A RESULT, THE SIDE PORT FELL OUT AND BECAME UNSTERILE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11287465 ↗MalfunctionFeb 5, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT WHEN OPENING THE DESTINATION, THE SIDE PORT WAS NOT DETACHED TO THE SHEATH. AS A RESULT, THE SIDE PORT FELL OUT AND BECAME UNSTERILE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11287451 ↗MalfunctionJan 21, 2021Material Deformation; Material Deformation
EVALUATION OF THE ACTUAL SAMPLE REVEALED THAT THE TIP OF THE DESTINATION SHEATH WAS DAMAGED IN A FASHION WHERE THERE ARE FOLDS AND A BULGE ON THE EDGE OF THE SHEATH. THE DILATOR WAS NOT DAMAGED. THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT UPON REMOVAL OF THE DESTINATION SHEATH FROM THE CASING THEY DISCOVERED THE DILATOR WOULD NOT FLUSH. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION WAS FINE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS A SUCCESS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY, MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 05NOV2020. THE PROCEDURE WAS A LEG ANGIO. THEY CONTINUED BY USING SECOND SAME DEVICE. THEY SAID THERE WAS NO HOLE. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION WAS STABLE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 18DEC2020. THE DILATOR WOULD NOT FLUSH.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11207940 ↗MalfunctionJan 11, 2021Break; Break
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT UPON OPENING THE DESTINATION PACKAGE IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE TIP OF THE DILATOR WAS BROKEN. IT WAS NOT INVOLVED WITH THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY, MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2020. THEY OPENED A SECOND (B)(4) TO CONTINUE THE PROCEDURE AS INTENDED. THEY FINISHED THE LEFT GROIN ACCESS PERIPHERAL LEG PROCEDURE AND COMPLETED THE CASE. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION WAS STABLE, AT THE TIME OF PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11146564 ↗MalfunctionJan 8, 2021Material Deformation; Material Deformation
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE DESTINATION SHEATH WAS KINKED AT THE DISTAL TIP. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY/MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THE PATIENT CONDITION WAS FINE. THE ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS WAS LESS THAN 250CC. THE PROCEDURE OUTCOME WAS A SUCCESS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 18DEC2020. THE KINK IN DISTAL SHEATH WAS DISCOVERED WHEN IT WAS OPENED. THE PROCEDURE BEING PERFORMED WAS A LEG ANGIO. THEY RESOLVED THE ISSUE WITH A NEW SHEATH. THE PATIENT WAS IN STABLE CONDITION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11139909 ↗MalfunctionDec 30, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT WHILE CAREFULLY OPENING A 6 FR DESTINATION SHEATH THE CCV WITH THE SIDE-PORT FELL OUT OF THE PACKAGE ON THE FLOOR. IT SEEMED TO BE COMPLETELY LOOSE IN THE STERILE PACKAGE. A SECOND DESTINATION SHEATH WAS OPENED AND USED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11095543 ↗MalfunctionDec 10, 2020Break; Break
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE USER EXPERIENCED DAMAGE ON A DESTINATION 6X45 CM SHEATH WHILE PULLING IT OUT AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE. THE SHAFT OF THE SHEATH WAS BROKEN INTO TWO PIECES, AND THE BRAIDING WIRE WAS THE ONLY THING UNBROKEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 02DECEMBER2020: THE PROCEDURE BEING PERFORMED WAS AN ARTERY FEMORALIS SUPERFICIALIS (AFS) CLOSURE. THERE ARE NO BROKEN SHEATH PIECES IN THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS. THE PATIENT WAS IN STABLE CONDITION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AFTER THE SHEATH WAS REMOVED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10987600 ↗MalfunctionDec 2, 2020Material Deformation; Material Deformation
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY THE DESTINATION CATHETER TIP WAS NOT SMOOTH ENOUGH TO GO THROUGH THE VESSELS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY/MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THE PATIENT WAS IN STABLE CONDITION. THE PROCEDURE OUTCOME WAS SUCCESSFUL AS THEY USED THE SAME PRODUCT TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 09NOV2020. TWO DEVICES WERE USED IN THE CASE THAT DISPLAYED THE SAMPLE ISSUE WITH THE EDGE OF THE CATHETER TIP NOT BEING SMOOTH ENOUGH TO GO THROUGH THE VESSEL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT ISSUE AS THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY USE A THIRD DEVICE WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10935074 ↗MalfunctionDec 2, 2020Material Deformation; Material Deformation
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY THE DESTINATION CATHETER TIP WAS NOT SMOOTH ENOUGH TO GO THROUGH THE VESSELS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY/MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THE PATIENT WAS IN STABLE CONDITION. THE PROCEDURE OUTCOME WAS SUCCESSFUL AS THEY USED THE SAME PRODUCT TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 09NOV2020. TWO DEVICES WERE USED IN THE CASE THAT DISPLAYED THE SAMPLE ISSUE WITH THE EDGE OF THE CATHETER TIP NOT BEING SMOOTH ENOUGH TO GO THROUGH THE VESSEL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT ISSUE AS THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY USE A THIRD DEVICE WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10935036 ↗MalfunctionNov 5, 2020Material Deformation; Material Deformation
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT A NURSE HAD CARRIED OUT A MATERIAL VIGILANCE ON A LONG INTRODUCER 6FR 45CM DESTINATION STRAIGHT DEVICE, THE INTRO WOULD HAVE BEEN TOTALLY DEFORMED UP TO 90 CM (IT HAD LENGTHENED). THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10794648 ↗MalfunctionOct 22, 2020Material Deformation; Material Deformation
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE DESTINATION CATHETER WAS DEFECTIVE. NO GUIDE WIRES WOULD PASS THROUGH THE INTRODUCER. THE PATIENT CONDITION IS GOOD. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY, MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 02OCTOBER2020: THE PROCEDURE WAS AN ANGIOGRAM OF THE LEGS. THE PATIENT WAS IN STABLE CONDITION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW DESTINATION. THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10720555 ↗
Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices
- VIZIGO D138502Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls4 deaths2,839 reports
- VIZIGO D138501Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls2 deaths2,005 reports
- Swartz™ 407451St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER5 deaths728 reports
- Edwards eSheath+ Introducer set 914ESPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Introducer, Catheter22 deaths532 reports
- Fast-Cath™ 406849St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER420 reports
- VIZIGO D138503Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER362 reports
- Agilis™ G408318St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER333 reports
- Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™ SI-1371-MSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Introducer, catheter1 death301 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page