DESTINATION RSR13Recalls & reported problems
Terumo Medical Corporation · DESTINATION Renal Guiding Sheath · Class 2
All models of DESTINATION (21)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00389701006970), received between Dec 29, 2016 and Sep 4, 2019 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Insert1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 4, 2019Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE INVOLVED DESTINATION WOULD NOT CROSS THE VESSEL. THE DOCTOR CHANGED TO A COOK SHUTTLE AND FINISHED THE PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 26AUG2019. THERE WAS NO SIGN OF DAMAGE TO THE DESTINATION. THE PROCEDURE WAS AN INSERTION. THE DESTINATION WAS UNABLE TO PENETRATE THE SKIN AND VASCULAR WALL. THE DEVICE DID NOT ENTER PATIENT'S BODY. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION WAS STABLE. AFTER USING THE OTHER DEVICE, THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8962279 ↗MalfunctionDec 29, 2016Material Separation; Material Separation
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED DAMAGE ON THE DESTINATION DEVICE. FOLLOW UP COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE USER FACILITY CONFIRMED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: WHEN THE MD OPENED THE PACKAGE IT LOOKED LIKE THE DILATOR TO SHEATH TRANSITION WAS JAGGED OR ROUGH; THE DEVICE IN QUESTION WAS NOT USED ON THE PATIENT; ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY; AND THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED AS DOING FINE.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6212569 ↗
Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices
- VIZIGO D138502Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls4 deaths2,839 reports
- VIZIGO D138501Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls2 deaths2,005 reports
- Swartz™ 407451St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER5 deaths728 reports
- Edwards eSheath+ Introducer set 914ESPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Introducer, Catheter22 deaths532 reports
- Fast-Cath™ 406849St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER420 reports
- VIZIGO D138503Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER362 reports
- Agilis™ G408318St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER333 reports
- Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™ SI-1371-MSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Introducer, catheter1 death301 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page