Skip to content

GLIDESHEATH SLENDER TIBIAL PEDAL KIT 51-1050Recalls & reported problems

Terumo Medical Corporation · GLIDESHEATH SLENDER Tibial Pedal Kit · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00389701011912), received between Jul 12, 2019 and Apr 11, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Unintended Movement1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 11, 2024Break; Break

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR WAS TRYING TO ACCESS A HEAVILY CALCIFIED POSTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY IN A CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA (CLI) PATIENT. NEEDLE ACCESS WAS ACHIEVED IN THE VESSEL HOWEVER, WHILE ATTEMPTING TO ADVANCE THE WIRE FROM THE KIT THROUGH THE NEEDLE INTO VESSEL, THE WIRE GOT STUCK IN THE CALCIUM BURDEN OF THE VESSEL. WHEN TRYING TO PULL THE WIRE BACK, THE TIP OF THE WIRE BROKE OFF AND WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. NO COMPLICATIONS WERE FOR THE PATIENT BECAUSE THE WIRE TIP WAS SECURED IN THE CALCIUM BURDEN OF THE OCCLUDED VESSEL. THE PROCEDURE FOR PATIENT WAS LEG ANGIOGRAM FOR CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA (CLI). THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY AND/OR REQUIRE MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION. NO DIRECT ALLEGATION THAT THE REPORTED DEVICE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO PATIENT INJURY AND/OR NEED FOR MEDICAL INTERVENTION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 14MAR2024: THERE ARE NO PLANS TO REMOVE BECAUSE THE DOCTOR CONSIDERED IT NON-SIGNIFICANT AND THAT IT WAS NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACTING THE PATIENT. APPROXIMATELY 1CM OF THE WIRE TIP WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. PATIENT WAS STABLE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 19092971 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 6, 2022Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE IN THE GLIDESHEATH SLENDER KIT GOT STUCK INSIDE OF THE PROVIDED NEEDLE AND REQUIRES MANIPULATION TO SUCCESSFULLY PASS THROUGH THE NEEDLE. PATIENT CONDITION WAS STABLE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 21 JUN 2022: THE PROCEDURE FOR THE PATIENT WAS A PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAM WITH ANGIOPLASTY AND ATHERECTOMY OF RIGHT LOWER EXTREMITY. THEY DID NOT SWITCH TO A NEW GLIDESHEATH SLENDER (GSS) TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14926166 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2019Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE GLIDESHEATH SLENDER SHEATH PROLAPSED INTO ITSELF WHEN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE A 0.018 BARD BALLOON, FULLY DEFLATED. THE PATIENT WAS IN STABLE CONDITION. THE PROCEDURE OUTCOME GOOD. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON JULY 8, 2019: THE PROCEDURE WAS A ANGIOGRAM AND INTERVENTION OF SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8784994 ↗

Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices

All INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page