Acrobat SUV Stabilizer OM-9000ZRecalls & reported problems
Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Acrobat SUV Vacuum Off-Pump System · Class 1
All models of Acrobat SUV Stabilizer (2)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 19
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 19 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00607567900004), received between Nov 19, 2020 and Jan 7, 2026 — classified as 19 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Damaged Prior to Use” (5 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Oct 16, 2024Class IIOpen, Classified
Deviations in the manufacturing process created a compromise in the sterile barrier, in which sterility cannot be assured during the duration of the product's 2-year shelf life.
Z-0485-2025 · Root cause: Process change control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Damaged Prior to Use5
- Mechanical Problem5
- Positioning Failure4
- Positioning Problem4
- Component Missing2
- Suction Failure2
- Suction Problem2
- Incomplete or Missing Packaging1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions19
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 19 most recent of 19 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 7, 2026Mechanical Problem
THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THAT THE ACROBAT SUV VACUUM STABLIZER SYSTEM WAS USED DURING A CABG PROCEDURE. THE HANDLE WAS CLOSED, BUT THE ARM WAS LOOSE, SO THE DEVICE WAS DISCONTINUED AND REPLACED WITH A STABILIZER FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER, WHICH ALLOWED THE PROCEDURE TO PROCEED WITHOUT INCIDENT. THERE WAS NO DELAY. NO PATENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23988787 ↗MalfunctionAug 13, 2025Positioning Problem; Positioning Problem
THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THAT DURING A CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS PROCEDURE, THEY TURNED THE ACROBAT SUV VACUUM STABILIZER SYSTEM KNOB BUT IT DID NOT LOCK IN PROPERLY. A NEW DEVICE WAS ISSUED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO MAJOR DELAY. NO HEALTH HAZARD.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22796471 ↗MalfunctionJun 16, 2025Positioning Problem; Positioning Problem
THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY USING ACROBAT SUV STABILIZER SYSTEM, EVEN WHEN THEY TURNED THE KNOB, THE ARM PART WAS NOT FIRMLY FIXED, SO THEY STOPPED USING IT. A DIFFERENT LOT OF PRODUCT WAS PREPARED AND USED, AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT INCIDENT. THERE WAS NO IMPACT OR DAMAGE TO THE PATIENT. THE CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON WHO PERFORMED THE PROCEDURE IS WELL-VERSED IN THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PROCEDURAL DELAYS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22212924 ↗MalfunctionFeb 13, 2025Suction Problem; Suction Problem
THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THAT AFTER THE THORACOTOMY, THEY ATTEMPTED TO SECURE THE ACROBAT SUV VACUUM STABILIZER SYSTEM (OM-9000Z) FEET TO THE AFFECTED AREA, BUT THE SUCTION WAS TOO WEAK TO SECURE THE FEET, SO THEY UNPACKED A NEW KIT. A REPLACEMENT DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO MAJOR DELAY. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PATIENT'S HEALTH.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21377187 ↗MalfunctionNov 14, 2024Mechanical Problem; Suction Problem; Mechanical Problem; Suction Problem
THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THAT DURING A CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS PROCEDURE AFTER THE THORACOTOMY, ACROBAT SUV VACUUM STABILIZER SYSTEM, ST ARM WOULD NOT STAY IN PLACE NO MATTER HOW MUCH THE KNOB WAS TURNED. THE SUCTION WAS ALSO WEAK AND IT COULD NOT BE FIXED TO THE AREA. A NEW DEVICE WAS OPENED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO MAJOR DELAY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20691212 ↗MalfunctionJan 9, 2024Positioning Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Positioning Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC VEIN HARVESTING PROCEDURE, ACROBAT SUV VACUUM STABILIZER SYSTEM, ST THE FIXING PART OF THE ACROBATIC SUV OM-9000Z WAS LOOSE AND COULD NOT BE FIXED PROPERLY. THE KNOB WAS TURNED TO SECURE (CLOSE) THE PRODUCT, BUT IT WAS NOT SECURED PROPERLY. A NEW DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITH NO DELAYS. THERE WERE NO EFFECTS TO PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18480259 ↗MalfunctionSep 26, 2023Positioning Failure; Mechanical Problem; Positioning Problem; Positioning Failure; Mechanical Problem; Positioning Problem
MalfunctionAug 29, 2023Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THAT DURING A CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS PROCEDURE USING ACROBAT SUV STABILIZER SYSTEM. THEY TURNED THE HANDLE TO FIX THE ARM OF OM9000Z, BUT THE HANDLE BECAME LOOSE AND THEY COULD NOT FIX IT. THEY TOOK OUT A NEW OM9000Z AND USED IT TO COMPLETE THE OPE. THERE WERE NO PARTICULAR EFFECTS ON THE PATIENT, SUCH AS DELAYS IN SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17645342 ↗MalfunctionAug 1, 2023Mechanical Problem; Suction Failure; Mechanical Problem; Suction Failure
MalfunctionApr 27, 2023Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
MalfunctionDec 7, 2022Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
MalfunctionDec 1, 2021Component Missing; Component Missing
THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THAT DURING PREPARATION FOR A CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS PROCEDURE USING ACROBAT-I STABILIZER. WHILST OPENING COMPONENTS IT WAS DISCOVERED ONE OF THEM WAS MISSING FROM THE BOX. THEY BELIEVE THE MISSING PART IS THE ACTUAL STABILIZER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12909653 ↗MalfunctionOct 11, 2021Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Damaged Prior to Use
MalfunctionOct 11, 2021Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Damaged Prior to Use
MalfunctionOct 11, 2021Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Damaged Prior to Use
MalfunctionOct 11, 2021Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Damaged Prior to Use
MalfunctionOct 11, 2021Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Damaged Prior to Use
MalfunctionSep 24, 2021Component Missing; Incomplete or Missing Packaging; Component Missing; Incomplete or Missing Packaging
MalfunctionNov 19, 2020Positioning Failure; Suction Failure; Positioning Failure; Suction Failure
N/A.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10869091 ↗
Other Stabilizer,Heart devices
- Acrobat-I Stabilizer OM-10000ZMaquet Cardiovascular LLC · Stabilizer,Heart2 recalls120 reports
- Acrobat-i Positioner XP-5000ZMaquet Cardiovascular LLC · Stabilizer,Heart2 recalls34 reports
- Acrobat-I Stabilizer OM-10000Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Stabilizer,Heart1 recall1 death51 reports
- OCTOPUS® TS2000Medtronic, Inc. · stabilizer,heart1 recall15 reports
- Herc Flex Universal Stabilizer Arm T401163Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Corporation · Stabilizer, Heart1 recall10 reports
- Acrobat V Stabilizer OM-9100SMaquet Cardiovascular LLC · Stabilizer,Heart1 recall7 reports
- OCTOPUS® TSMICS1Medtronic, Inc. · Stabilizer, heart1 recall5 reports
- Acrobat SUV Stabilizer OM-9000SMaquet Cardiovascular LLC · Stabilizer,Heart1 recall3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page