Kii Shielded Bladed Dual Pack CTB14Recalls & reported problems
Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Trocar · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00607915123949), received between Oct 2, 2017 and Oct 2, 2017 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Jam” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Mechanical Jam1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 2, 2017Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam
PROCEDURE PERFORMED: LAPAROSCOPIC HERNIA REPAIR. EVENT DESCRIPTION: I WAS IN ATTENDANCE AT THE TIME OF THE FOLLOWING EVENT. APPLIED MEDICAL ARE CURRENTLY EVALUATING TROCARS IN THIS HOSPITAL AS PART OF ANEURIN BEVAN TRUST. THE PRIMARY PORT WAS PLACED, BY THE SURGEON MR [NAME]. USING INTERNAL VISION CONTROLLED BY MR [NAME], HIS REGISTRAR MS [NAME] ATTEMPTED TO PLACE A SECONDARY 5 MM PORT (CTB14). THE INITIAL 'CLICK' WAS AUDIBLE ON ENTRY WHICH SUGGESTED THE BLADE WAS ENGAGED,. SHE PROCEEDED TO CUT THROUGH ABDOMINAL TISSUE AND THE PORT CAME IN TO VIEW. THE BLADE WAS CLEARLY VISABLE. MS [NAME] SUGGESTED SHE HAD HEARD THE SECONDARY 'CLICK' BUT THE BLADE HAD NOT RETRACTED AS IT SHOULD HAVE DONE. IT WAS OBVIOUS THAT THOUGH NOT CUTTING ANY TISSUE WAS STILL EXPOSED. MS [NAME] REMOVED THE BLADED OBTURATOR FROM THE CANNULA AND CONTINUED WITH THE PROCEDURE. NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT WAS CAUSED AS A RESULT OF THE EXPOSED BLADE. THE BLADED OBTURATOR WAS COLLECTED FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE, AND IS BEING KEPT AT THE THEATRE MANAGERS OFFICE AWAITING COLLECTION. TYPE OF INTERVENTION: SURGEON REMOVED THE BLADED OBTURATOR FROM THE CANNULA AND CONTINUED WITH THE PROCEDURE. PATIENT STATUS: DID A PATIENT INJ
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6909019 ↗
Other Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery devices
- HIGH DEFINITION LCD MONITOR OEV262HOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,937 reports
- HD AUTOCLAVABLE CAMERA HEAD OTV-S7ProH-HD-12EOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,886 reports
- HD AUTOCLAVABLE CAMERA HEAD OTV-S7ProH-HD-10EOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,086 reports
- Auto Suture OMS-T10BTCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1 recall955 reports
- PDB OMS-PDB1000Covidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery859 reports
- VISERA 4K UHD CAMERA CONTROL UNIT OLYMPUS OTV-S400Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery777 reports
- Auto Suture OMS-T10SBCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1 recall697 reports
- Spacemaker SMBTTRNDXCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery590 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page