MOSAIC® 310C31 (UDI 00613994688996)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · VALVE 310C31 MOSAIC MIT CINCH US · Class 3 · Implant
All models of MOSAIC (59)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 16
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 16
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 16 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00613994688996), received between Mar 19, 2018 and Jul 29, 2026 — classified as 16 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (11 reports).
3 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P990064); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information11
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Patient Device Interaction Problem2
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Calcified1
- Device Stenosis1
- Incomplete Coaptation1
- Intravalvular regurgitation1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information7
- Mitral Valve Stenosis5
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation4
- Endocarditis2
- No Information2
- Non specific EKG/ECG Changes2
- Foreign Body Reaction1
- Heart Block1
Recent adverse event reports
The 16 most recent of 16 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 29, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem
It was reported that 2 years and 10 months post implant of this 31mm tricuspid annuloplasty ring and 31mm mitral bioprosthetic valve, a defibrillator was implanted. The reason for the defibrillator was reported as low ejection fraction (EF). No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
Patient problems: Non specific EKG/ECG Changes
MAUDE report 50065959 ↗InjuryJun 30, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 2 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE AND 32MM AORTIC ANNULOPLASTY BAND, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS COMPLETE HEART BLOCK (CHB). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Heart Block
MAUDE report 25663626 ↗InjuryMar 28, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM THE PATIENT THAT 8 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A VALVE OF A DIFFERENT MANUFACTURER. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 21718189 ↗InjurySep 16, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 12 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 31MM VALVE OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20232382 ↗InjuryDec 22, 2023Device Stenosis; Intravalvular regurgitation; Device Stenosis; Intravalvular regurgitation
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 12 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, THE PATIENT'S MITRAL VALVE IS BEING EVALUATED FOR A TRANSCATHETER VALVE-IN-VALVE REPLACEMENT. THE REASON FOR EVALUATION WAS REPORTED AS SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION (MR) AND MITRAL STENOSIS. NO INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. SUBSEQUENTLY 20 DAYS LATER, THE PATIENT HAD AN MITRAL VALVE-IN-VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH A TRANSCATHETER VALVE OF DIFFERENT MANUFACTURER. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Mitral Valve Stenosis
MAUDE report 18382790 ↗InjuryNov 3, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 11 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A VALVE OF THE SAME MODEL AND SIZE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18063964 ↗InjurySep 15, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 4 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 33MM VALVE OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 17753970 ↗InjuryApr 6, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT AFTER AN UNKNOWN DURATION OF TIME POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION. NO INTERVENTION OR ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 16689574 ↗InjuryMar 23, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 8 DAYS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Non specific EKG/ECG Changes
MAUDE report 16598822 ↗InjuryDec 15, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 8 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 29MM MITRAL MECHANICAL VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Endocarditis; Insufficient Information; Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Mitral Valve Stenosis
MAUDE report 13013052 ↗InjuryDec 3, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 10 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 29MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 12923977 ↗InjuryFeb 1, 2021Calcified; Incomplete Coaptation; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Calcified; Incomplete Coaptation; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 9 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 33MM VALVE OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; Insufficient Information; Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 11259144 ↗InjuryNov 13, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 9 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 33MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS REPORTED AS MITRAL STENOSIS. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Valve Stenosis
MAUDE report 10835740 ↗InjuryJan 30, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 8 YEARS 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 29MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE FOR UNKNOWN REASONS. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Valve Stenosis; No Information
MAUDE report 8289274 ↗InjuryAug 8, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT FOUR YEARS AND FIVE MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, THE VALVE WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A VALVE OF THE SAME SIZE AND MODEL. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT IS UNKNOWN. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Endocarditis; Mitral Valve Stenosis; No Code Available; No Information
MAUDE report 7762459 ↗InjuryMar 19, 2018Perivalvular Leak; Perivalvular Leak
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM A PATIENT, WHO REPORTED TO MEDTRONIC'S TECHNICAL SERVICES, THAT 1 YEAR AND 7 MONTHS POST IMPLANT, THIS BIOPROSTHETIC MITRAL VALVE WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC VALVE DUE TO PARAVALVULAR LEAK. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7350905 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P990064. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1880-2019 · May 21, 2019 · TerminatedMosaic 310 Bioprosthesis, Mitral, REF 310C29 - Product Usage: Replacement of malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves.
- Z-1881-2019 · May 21, 2019 · TerminatedMosaic 310 Bioprosthesis, Mitral, REF 310C31 - Product Usage: Replacement of malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves.
- Z-1225-2009 · Jan 26, 2009 · TerminatedMedtronic Mosaic Porcine Bioprostheses with Cinch, Heart Valve; Model 305; Catalog #s 305C21AA, 305C2701, 305C2301, 305C2501, and 305C2901; Sterile LC; Rx only; Medtronic Inc 710 M
Other heart-valve, non-allograft tissue devices
- INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE 11500AEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Heart-Valve, Non-Allograft Tissue2 deaths404 reports
- INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE 11500AEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Heart-Valve, Non-Allograft Tissue385 reports
- PERCEVAL PVS23Corcym Canada Corp · heart-valve, non-allograft tissue26 deaths337 reports
- MOSAIC® 305C23Medtronic, Inc. · heart-valve, non-allograft tissue327 reports
- MOSAIC® 305C25Medtronic, Inc. · heart-valve, non-allograft tissue2 deaths324 reports
- FREESTYLE® FR995-27Medtronic, Inc. · heart-valve, non-allograft tissue2 deaths318 reports
- FREESTYLE® FR995-29Medtronic, Inc. · heart-valve, non-allograft tissue288 reports
- FREESTYLE® FR99525Medtronic, Inc. · heart-valve, non-allograft tissue2 deaths280 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page