Skip to content

PROFILE 3D® 680R40Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · RING 680R40 PROFILE 3D 26L MEXICO · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PROFILE 3D (11)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00613994759184), received between Mar 16, 2017 and May 15, 2024 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Intravalvular regurgitation” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Intravalvular regurgitation2
  • Device Stenosis1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation2
  • Atrial Fibrillation1
  • Mitral Valve Stenosis1
  • No Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 15, 2024Intravalvular regurgitation; Intravalvular regurgitation

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 1 YEAR AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 40MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS REPORTED THAT A T RANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAM (TEE) DISCOVERED SEVERE RECURRENT MITRAL REGURGITATION. NO INTERVENTION OR ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation

    MAUDE report 19319900 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 20, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 3 DAYS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 40MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, THE PATIENT DEVELOPED POSTOPERATIVE ATRIAL FIBRILLATION. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH MEDICATION. NO INTERVENTIONS OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Atrial Fibrillation

    MAUDE report 18738067 ↗
  • InjuryOct 26, 2023Device Stenosis; Intravalvular regurgitation; Device Stenosis; Intravalvular regurgitation

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 1 YEAR AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 40MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAM (TTE) SHOWED MODERATE MITRAL INSUFFICIENCY. NO INTERVENTION OR ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. SUBSEQUENTLY, AT THE PATIENT'S 2 YEAR FOLLOW-UP IT WAS NOTED THAT STENOSIS, AND SEVERE MITRAL INSUFFICIENCY ARE PRESENT. NO INTERVENTION OR ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Mitral Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 18015150 ↗
  • InjuryMar 16, 2017Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING IMPLANT OF THIS ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED BECAUSE IT WAS THE INCORRECT SIZE FOR THE PATIENT. NO OTHER ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6411975 ↗

Other RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices

All RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page