PROFILE 3DRecalls & reported problems across all models
Medtronic, Inc. · 11 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 209
- Deaths reported
- 3
- Injuries reported
- 205
- Recalls
- 0
We found 11 models of PROFILE 3D by Medtronic, Inc. in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 209 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jan 17, 2017 and Jul 29, 2026 — classified as 3 deaths, 205 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (135 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported PROFILE 3D problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information135
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem53
- Patient Device Interaction Problem29
- Intravalvular regurgitation12
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size7
- Calcified4
- Device Stenosis3
- Perivalvular Leak3
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information72
- No Information55
- Mitral Regurgitation42
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation33
- Non specific EKG/ECG Changes18
- Heart Block13
- Mitral Valve Stenosis10
- No Code Available7
PROFILE 3D models
11 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- PROFILE 3D® 680R28RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death67 reports
- PROFILE 3D® 680R30RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death40 reports
- PROFILE 3D® 680R32RING, ANNULOPLASTY31 reports
- PROFILE 3D® 680R26RING, ANNULOPLASTY24 reports
- PROFILE 3D® 680R34RING, ANNULOPLASTY16 reports
- PROFILE 3D® 680R36RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death10 reports
- PROFILE 3D® 680R38RING, ANNULOPLASTY9 reports
- PROFILE 3D® 680R24RING, ANNULOPLASTY6 reports
- PROFILE 3D® 680R40RING, ANNULOPLASTY4 reports
- PROFILE 3D™ 680R26RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 report
- PROFILE 3D™ 680R28RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 report
Recent PROFILE 3D adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 29, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
It was reported that during the implant of this 32mm Profile 3D annuloplasty ring, it was explanted and replaced with an unknown device. The reason for the replacement was not reported. No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 50065795 ↗InjuryJul 6, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 2 WEEKS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 28MM PROFILE 3D HEART RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS COMPLETE HEART BLOCK (CHB). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Heart Block
MAUDE report 25714965 ↗InjuryApr 21, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN UNKNOWN DURATION POST IMPLANT OF THIS 28MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN U NKNOWN DEVICE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24938397 ↗InjuryApr 21, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 1 YEAR AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 34MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS SICK SINUS SYNDROME (SSS). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Non specific EKG/ECG Changes
MAUDE report 24938302 ↗InjuryApr 14, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 7 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 32MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN PRODUCT. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24874298 ↗InjuryFeb 20, 2026Intravalvular regurgitation
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THE DEVICE DID NOT MALFUNCTION AND THE DEVICE WAS FULLY SUTURED AND TESTED PRIOR TO REMOVAL. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 24399985 ↗InjuryFeb 16, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 9 YEARS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 38MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN DEVICE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24344977 ↗InjuryDec 23, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 12 YEARS AND 1 MONTH POST IMPLANT OF THIS 36MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS INCOMPLETE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK (AVB). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Non specific EKG/ECG Changes
MAUDE report 23877954 ↗InjuryNov 28, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 8 YEARS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 32MM MITRAL HEART RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS COMPLETE HEART BLOCK (CHB). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Heart Block
MAUDE report 23671247 ↗InjuryNov 26, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST IMPLANT OF THIS 26MM ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN PRODUCT. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23657784 ↗InjuryNov 26, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 8 YEARS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 32MM ANNULOPLASTY HEART RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN PRODUCT. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23655119 ↗InjuryNov 14, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN NEW HEART RING IN THE MITRAL POSITION. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23554313 ↗InjuryOct 30, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC MECHANICAL VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS REPORTED AS AN UNSUCCESSFUL REPAIR. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANNULOPLASTY PRODUCT MALFUNCTIONED AND WAS FULLY SUTURED AND TESTED PRIOR TO REMOVAL. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23427597 ↗InjuryOct 24, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 9 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 28MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23380389 ↗InjurySep 11, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 24MM PROFILE 3D HEART RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN PRODUCT. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23027888 ↗
Other Medtronic, Inc. products
- CapSureFix Novus MRI SureScan29 models · 87,337 reports
- Medtronic Sprint Quattro Lead67 models · 45,880 reports · 1 recall
- Intellis AdaptiveStim3 models · 35,469 reports
- SYNCHROMED II11 models · 32,260 reports · 4 recalls
- CAPSUREFIX NOVUS17 models · 27,547 reports
- INTERSTIM30 models · 24,415 reports · 1 recall
- Sprint Quattro Secure S MRI SureScan7 models · 23,549 reports
- Medtronic LINQ Heart Monitor11 models · 19,366 reports · 3 recalls
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page