MEDRAD® Disposable Prostate Coil BPX 15Recalls & reported problems
Bayer Medical Care Inc. · " MRInnervu Prostate Endorectal Coil, Compatible with 1.5 Tesla for GE, Siemens, and Marconi. (COIL,DISPOSABLE ENDORECTAL 1.5T,MC) (60727471)" · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00616258009193), received between Jul 26, 2018 and Jul 26, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Patient Device Interaction Problem1
Patient problems
- Bowel Perforation1
- Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
- Perforation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 26, 2018Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
THE SITE REPORTED THE FOLLOWING: A (B)(6) MALE PATIENT WITH ELEVATED PSA LEVELS WAS UNDERGOING AN MRI OF THE PROSTATE. DURING PRE-SCREENING THE PATIENT DENIED ANY HISTORY OF RECTAL PROBLEMS OR TRAUMA. THE PATIENT WAS PLACED UNDER SEDATION BY ANESTHESIA STAFF AND A BPX 15 ENDORECTAL COIL WAS INSERTED BY A PROSTATE CLINIC NURSE INTO THE PATIENT'S RECTUM WITHOUT ANY DIFFICULTY NOTED. THE SITE REPORTED THAT THE INSERTION WAS DONE FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE AND THAT 70 ML OF AIR WAS USED TO INFLATE THE BALLOON. AFTER THE MRI WAS COMPLETED THE AIR WAS REMOVED FROM THE BALLOON WITH A SYRINGE AND THE ENDORECTAL COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITHOUT DIFFICULTY. THE NURSE REMOVING THE ENDORECTAL COIL NOTED THERE WAS BLOOD ON THE TIP OF THE ENDORECTAL COIL. SHE NOTICED NOTHING ELSE UNUSUAL WITH THE TIP OF THE ENDORECTAL COIL. THE PHYSICIAN WAS INFORMED, IMAGES WERE REVIEWED AND A POSSIBLE RECTAL TEAR WAS IDENTIFIED. DURING IMAGE REVIEW IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A VERY UNUSUAL SIGNIFICANT TURN IN HIS RECTAL ANATOMY. THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT WHERE HE HAD X-RAYS PERFORMING WHICH REVEALED FREE AIR AND A 5 CM RECTAL TEAR. THE PATIENT THEN BEGAN TO
Patient problems: Bowel Perforation; Patient Problem/Medical Problem; Perforation
MAUDE report 7723567 ↗
Other System, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging devices
- Ingenia Ingenia Elition XPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · System, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging14 recalls12 reports
- Ingenia Elition SPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · System, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging13 recalls2 reports
- NA Discovery MR750w 3.0TGE Medical Systems, L.L.C. · System, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging13 recalls0 reports
- Ingenia Ingenia Ambition XPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · System, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging12 recalls12 reports
- Ingenia Ingenia 3.0T CXPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · System, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging11 recalls59 reports
- Ingenia Smartpath to dStream for 3.0TPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · System, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging11 recalls44 reports
- Ingenia Ingenia Elition XPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · System, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging11 recalls5 reports
- MR 7000 Series MR 7700Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · System, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging11 recalls4 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page