Skip to content

MOSAIC ULTRA® 305U219 (UDI 00643169001862)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · VLV 305U219 MOSAIC AOR ULT CII NNA US TE · Class 3 · Implant

All models of MOSAIC ULTRA (40)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169001862), received between Jun 18, 2019 and Mar 16, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Gradient Increase” (5 reports).

3 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P990064); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Gradient Increase5
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information5
  • Device Stenosis3
  • Intravalvular regurgitation2

Patient problems

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis9
  • Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation3
  • Insufficient Information3
  • Aortic Regurgitation2
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 16, 2026Gradient Increase; Device Stenosis; Intravalvular regurgitation

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 10 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, THE PATIENT IS BEING EVAL UATED FOR A TRANSCATHETER VALVE-IN-VALVE REPLACEMENT. THE REASON FOR EVALUATION WAS REPORTED AS AORTIC STENOSIS, MODERATE AORTIC INSUFFIECNCY, A MEAN GRADIENT OF 38MMHG AND A PEAK VELOCITY OF 3.9M/SECOND. NO INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. S UBSEQUENTLY, 1 MONTH AND 1 DAY LATER, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Aortic Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 24606877 ↗
  • InjuryDec 9, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Stenosis; Intravalvular regurgitation; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Stenosis; Intravalvular regurgitation

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS DUE TO AORTIC STENOSIS AND MODERATE TO SEVERE ECCENTRIC REGURGITATION, "SUGGESTIVE OF PATIENT PROSTHETIC MISMATCH". NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20878371 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 9, 2024Gradient Increase; Device Stenosis; Gradient Increase; Device Stenosis

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WHICH STATED THAT THE REASON FOR EVALUATION WAS AORTIC STENOSIS (AS). NO INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19276753 ↗
  • InjuryNov 2, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 7 YEARS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED AS SEVERE STENOSIS AND SEVERE INSUFFICIENCY. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS ADEQUATELY SEATED AND FUNCTIONING. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Aortic Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 15715026 ↗
  • InjuryJan 5, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 8 YEARS AND 1 MONTH POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11117424 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 10, 2020Gradient Increase; Gradient Increase

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 2 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE, IT WAS REPLACED VALVE-IN-VALVE WITH A 23MM TRANSCATHETER VALVE. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS REPORTED AS A COMBINATION OF AORTIC STENOSIS, SEVERE AORTIC REGURGITATION, AND A GRADIENT OF 32MMHG. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Regurgitation; Aortic Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 9689236 ↗
  • InjuryNov 11, 2019Gradient Increase; Gradient Increase

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 3 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE, IT WAS REPLACED VALVE-IN-VALVE WITH A 23MM TRANSCATHETER VALVE. THE REASONS FOR REPLACEMENT WERE REPORTED AS AORTIC STENOSIS, MODERATE TO SEVERE AORTIC REGURGITATION, AND A MEAN GRADIENT OF 37MMHG. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA (EOA) OF THE VALVE WAS 0.7 CM. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Regurgitation; Aortic Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 9306822 ↗
  • InjuryJul 26, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 3 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19 MM BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE, IT WAS REPLACED VALVE-IN-VALVE WITH A 23 MM TRANSCATHETER VALVE DUE TO STENOSIS. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 8831311 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2019Gradient Increase; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Gradient Increase; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 6 YEARS AND 1 MONTH POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis; No Information

    MAUDE report 8710074 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P990064. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1880-2019 · May 21, 2019 · Terminated
    Mosaic 310 Bioprosthesis, Mitral, REF 310C29 - Product Usage: Replacement of malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves.
  • Z-1881-2019 · May 21, 2019 · Terminated
    Mosaic 310 Bioprosthesis, Mitral, REF 310C31 - Product Usage: Replacement of malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves.
  • Z-1225-2009 · Jan 26, 2009 · Terminated
    Medtronic Mosaic Porcine Bioprostheses with Cinch, Heart Valve; Model 305; Catalog #s 305C21AA, 305C2701, 305C2301, 305C2501, and 305C2901; Sterile LC; Rx only; Medtronic Inc 710 M

Other heart-valve, non-allograft tissue devices

All heart-valve, non-allograft tissue devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page