Simulus™ 800SR30Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · RING SIM SR 800SR30 SEMI-RIGID · Class 2 · Implant
Quick summary
This Medtronic Simulus 800SR30 semi-rigid ring is a flexible heart valve ring used in mitral valve repair surgery. The 44 reports mostly describe patients who years after implantation needed a pacemaker or defibrillator, or had the ring removed and replaced during further heart surgery, along with ongoing mitral valve leakage (regurgitation). No deaths were reported, 43 injuries and 1 malfunction. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 43
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 42
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 43 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169182288), received between Nov 30, 2016 and Jun 23, 2025 — classified as 42 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (27 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information27
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem13
- Patient Device Interaction Problem5
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size3
- Intravalvular regurgitation3
- Gradient Increase2
- Material Separation2
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
Patient problems
- No Information16
- Mitral Regurgitation12
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation8
- Insufficient Information7
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient6
- Non specific EKG/ECG Changes4
- Atrial Fibrillation2
- Tachycardia2
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 43 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 23, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 5 YEARS AND 1 MONTH POST IMPLANT OF THIS SIMULUS RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS SICK SINUS SYNDROME (SSS), ATRIAL TACHYCARDIA (AT), ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AT) ANDATRIAL FLUTTER (A-FL). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Tachycardia
MAUDE report 22307012 ↗InjuryApr 30, 2025Intravalvular regurgitation; Intravalvular regurgitation
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL FOR MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT SURGERY AND ON (B)(6) 2025, THE 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING WAS EXPLANTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Anemia; Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 21935601 ↗MalfunctionNov 14, 2024Intravalvular regurgitation; Intravalvular regurgitation
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 2 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, THE PATIENT WAS SEEN FOR 2 YEAR FOLLOW UP IN THE CLINIC, IT WAS NOTED THE THE PATIENT HAD "SLIGHT COMPLAINTS" THAT WERE NOT LISTED, AN ECHOCARDIOGRAM SHOWED MODERATE MITRAL INSUFFICIENCY (MI). TWO WEEKS LATER, A TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY (TEE) PERFORMED ALSO SHOWED MODERATE MITRAL INSUFFICIENCY (MI). NO INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 20688170 ↗InjuryOct 15, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Intravalvular regurgitation; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Intravalvular regurgitation
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 8 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY BAND. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 20449399 ↗InjuryAug 27, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 7 DAYS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS SICK SINUS SYNDROME. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Non specific EKG/ECG Changes
MAUDE report 20075492 ↗InjuryAug 20, 2024Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 2 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A DEFIBRILLATOR WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE DEFIBRILLATOR WAS REPORTED AS CARDIOMYOPATHY. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Cardiomyopathy
MAUDE report 20001846 ↗InjuryAug 13, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 1 YEAR AND 3 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS SICK SINUS SYNDROME. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Non specific EKG/ECG Changes
MAUDE report 19977180 ↗InjuryJul 15, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 12 DAYS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS ATRIAL ARRHYTHMIAS ( ATRIAL FLUTTER, ATRIAL FIBRILLATION, ATRIAL TACHYCARDIA). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Atrial Fibrillation; Non specific EKG/ECG Changes; Tachycardia
MAUDE report 19742500 ↗InjuryJul 15, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 6 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS COMPLETE HEART BLOCK (CHB). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Heart Block
MAUDE report 19742404 ↗InjuryApr 27, 2023Perivalvular Leak; Perivalvular Leak
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 8 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, SEVERE REGURGITATION WAS OBSERVED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT BOTH TRANSVALVULAR AND PARAVALVULAR REGURGITATION WERE PRESENT. SUBSEQUENTLY, 4 MONTHS LATER, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC PRODUCT. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Valvular Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 16827118 ↗InjuryDec 14, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 6 DAYS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, PLEURAL EFFUSION WAS NOTED ON ECHOCARDIOGRAM (ECHO). IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED AND 1200ML OF FLUID WAS REMOVED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Pleural Effusion
MAUDE report 15982751 ↗InjurySep 29, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A N ON-MEDTRONIC PRODUCT. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 15507591 ↗InjuryAug 10, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A N ON-MEDTRONIC PRODUCT. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 15202665 ↗InjuryMay 23, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 9 DAYS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY BAND, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN PRODUCT. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS REPORTED AS MODERATE TO SEVERE MITRAL INSUFFICIENCY. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT DEVICE RELATED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 14476602 ↗InjuryApr 11, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 29MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 14074229 ↗InjurySep 15, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 29MM MECHANICAL MITRAL VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 12477998 ↗InjuryAug 31, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 31MM MECHANICAL MITRAL VALVE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS REPORTED AS "2+ MITRAL REGURGITATION". NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 12393163 ↗InjuryApr 16, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT ON THE SAME DAY AS THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS INCOMPLETE ATRIO-VENTRICULAR (AV) BLOCK. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Non specific EKG/ECG Changes
MAUDE report 11680646 ↗InjuryFeb 11, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN PRODUCT. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 11314114 ↗InjuryJan 8, 2021Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS REPORTED AS AN UNSUCCESSFUL REPAIR. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 11140868 ↗InjuryOct 21, 2020Gradient Increase; Gradient Increase
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30 MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 34 MM ANNULOPLASTY RING OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS REPORTED AS ELEVATED GRADIENT. THE 34 MM ANNULOPLASTYRING WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON MEDTRONIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS REPAIR DID NOT APPEAR TO BE SUCCESSFUL. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A VERY BROAD P2 SCALLOP WHICH WAS FLAIL AND AT LEAST 5 RUPTURED CORDAE TENDINEAE. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 10712502 ↗InjurySep 18, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30 MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 29 MM MECHANICAL VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Regurgitation; No Information
MAUDE report 10556569 ↗InjuryJun 10, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THIS SURGERY A 28MM AND 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING OF THE SAME MODEL WERE ATTEMPTED TO BE USED, BUT ULTIMATELY THE VALVE WAS REPLACED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC PRODUCT. THE REASON THE ANNULOPLASTY DEVICES WERE NOT USED WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 10138694 ↗InjuryMay 12, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A N ON-MEDTRONIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Regurgitation; No Information
MAUDE report 10047816 ↗InjuryApr 28, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 1 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 10005809 ↗
Other RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL32Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death71 reports
- PROFILE 3D® 680R28Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death67 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL30Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death65 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638RL32Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY59 reports
- Tri-Ad™ 900SFC228Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY4 deaths56 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL34Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY51 reports
- Contour 3D® 690R30Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death50 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638RL30Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death47 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.