SimulusRecalls & reported problems across all models
Medtronic, Inc. · 40 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
2 open recalls name at least one Simulus model. Check whether yours is affected in the recall details, and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 493
- Deaths reported
- 3
- Injuries reported
- 485
- Recalls
- 2
We found 40 models of Simulus by Medtronic, Inc. in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 493 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Nov 30, 2016 and Sep 25, 2026 — classified as 3 deaths, 485 injuries, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (337 reports).
2 FDA recall records name at least one of these models by its device identifier, 2 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Simulus recalls
FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.
- Jan 14, 2020Open, Classified
Demonstration Simulus Reusable Sizer Accessory Kits were being incorrectly sourced to customers. The demonstration product (product used within a wet lab) could have come in contact with non-human (porcine) tissue.
Z-1450-2020 · Root cause: Nonconforming Material/Component · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Jan 14, 2020Open, Classified
Demonstration Simulus Reusable Sizer Accessory Kits were being incorrectly sourced to customers. The demonstration product (product used within a wet lab) could have come in contact with non-human (porcine) tissue.
Z-1449-2020 · Root cause: Nonconforming Material/Component · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported Simulus problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information337
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem119
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size38
- Patient Device Interaction Problem38
- Intravalvular regurgitation30
- Material Separation13
- Device Stenosis8
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available5
Patient problems
- No Information182
- Insufficient Information149
- Mitral Regurgitation98
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation71
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient32
- Non specific EKG/ECG Changes16
- Atrial Fibrillation11
- Tachycardia11
Simulus models
40 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Simulus™ 750SIZER, HEART-VALVE, PROSTHESIS1 recall0 reports
- Simulus™ 850SIZER, HEART-VALVE, PROSTHESIS1 recall0 reports
- Simulus™ 800SR30RING, ANNULOPLASTY43 reports
- Simulus™ 800SR34RING, ANNULOPLASTY36 reports
- Simulus™ 700FC29RING, ANNULOPLASTY36 reports
- Simulus™ 700FC31RING, ANNULOPLASTY34 reports
- Simulus™ 700FC27RING, ANNULOPLASTY32 reports
- Simulus™ 700FC33RING, ANNULOPLASTY30 reports
- Simulus™ 800SR28RING, ANNULOPLASTY29 reports
- Simulus™ 800SR32RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death28 reports
- Simulus™ 800SR36RING, ANNULOPLASTY19 reports
- Simulus™ 800SR26RING, ANNULOPLASTY16 reports
- Simulus™ 800SR38RING, ANNULOPLASTY16 reports
- Simulus™ 700FC35RING, ANNULOPLASTY15 reports
- Simulus™ 700FF29RING, ANNULOPLASTY15 reports
- Simulus™ 800SC36RING, ANNULOPLASTY13 reports
- Simulus™ 700FC25RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death13 reports
- Simulus™ 700FC37RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death11 reports
- Simulus™ 800SC34RING, ANNULOPLASTY10 reports
- Simulus™ 800SC28RING, ANNULOPLASTY10 reports
- Simulus™ 700FC23RING, ANNULOPLASTY10 reports
- Simulus™ 800SR40RING, ANNULOPLASTY9 reports
- Simulus™ 800SR24RING, ANNULOPLASTY8 reports
- Simulus™ 700FC39RING, ANNULOPLASTY8 reports
- Simulus™ 800SC30RING, ANNULOPLASTY7 reports
- Simulus™ 700FF27RING, ANNULOPLASTY7 reports
- Simulus™ 800SC32RING, ANNULOPLASTY6 reports
- Simulus™ 700FF31RING, ANNULOPLASTY6 reports
- Simulus™ 700FF25RING, ANNULOPLASTY5 reports
- Simulus™ 700FF33RING, ANNULOPLASTY5 reports
- Simulus™ 800SC24RING, ANNULOPLASTY3 reports
- Simulus™ 800SC38RING, ANNULOPLASTY2 reports
- Simulus™ 800SC26RING, ANNULOPLASTY2 reports
- Simulus™ 700FF37RING, ANNULOPLASTY2 reports
- Simulus™ 700FF35RING, ANNULOPLASTY2 reports
- Simulus™ 800SC40RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 report
- Simulus™ 735AF37RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 report
- Simulus™ 700FF23RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 report
- Simulus™ 700FF39RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 report
- Simulus™ 735AC35RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 report
Recent Simulus adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 25, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information
Medtronic received information that 5 months post implant of this 36mm mitral annuloplasty band, it was explanted and replaced with a 30mm mitral annuloplasty band of the same model. The reason for the replacement was not reported. No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 50896364 ↗InjuryJul 17, 2026Intravalvular regurgitation
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM THE PATIENT THAT 5 YEARS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 29MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY BAND, SEVERE MITRAL REGUR GITATION WAS NOTED. THE PATIENT ALLEGED THAT THE HEART BAND MIGHT BE ¿FLOATING AROUND¿ AND EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT POSSIBLE MOVEMENT OR DISLODGEMENT, BUT COULD NOT CONFIRM WHETHER IT HAD MOVED OR DISLODGED. THE PATIENT ALSO REPORTED THAT A RECENT TRANSESOPHAGEAL E CHOCARDIOGRAM AND/OR CATHETER-BASED EVALUATION INCLUDED A PHYSICIAN NOTE INDICATING THE HEART BAND WAS ¿TOO SMALL.¿ THE PATIENT STATED THEY PLANNED TO BE EVALUATED BY A NEW CARDIOLOGIST FOR THE ONGOING REGURGITATION AND BELIEVED A HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT MIGHT BE RECOMMENDED. NO INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 25855624 ↗InjuryJul 15, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 6 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 35MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 35MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY BAND. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25822916 ↗InjuryJun 4, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 2 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 33 MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY BAND, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS SICK SINUS SYNDROME (SSS). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Non specific EKG/ECG Changes
MAUDE report 25391044 ↗MalfunctionMay 28, 2026Intravalvular regurgitation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 5 YEARS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 32MM ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS REPORTED THAT A TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAM (TTE) PERFORMED NOTED MODERATE TRICUSPID REGURGITATION. NO INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 25313573 ↗InjuryMay 27, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 6 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 29MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY BAND, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 29MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25300595 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 7 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 29 MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS BRADYCARDIA-TACHYCARDIA SYNDROME. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Bradycardia; Tachycardia
MAUDE report 25184007 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 7 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 29MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A N ON-MEDTRONIC DEVICE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25123182 ↗InjuryMar 6, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Stenosis; Intravalvular regurgitation
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 4 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 34MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY BAND, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 33MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Calcium Deposits/Calcification; Insufficient Information; Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Mitral Valve Stenosis
MAUDE report 24536532 ↗InjuryFeb 24, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 3 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 33MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS COMPLETE HEART BLOCK (CHB). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Heart Block
MAUDE report 24428721 ↗InjuryFeb 20, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 14 DAYS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY BAND, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS SICK SINUS SYNDROME (SSS) AND ATRIAL ARRHYTHMIAS ((ATRIAL TACHYCARDIA (AT). ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AF) AND ATRIAL FLUTTER (A-FL)). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Tachycardia
MAUDE report 24400358 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 26MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN DEVICE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24376200 ↗InjuryFeb 12, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Intravalvular regurgitation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 2 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY BAND, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 3 0MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY BAND OF A DIFFERENT MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 24321342 ↗InjuryJan 23, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED 7 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY BAND, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 30MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY BAND OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24159405 ↗MalfunctionJan 22, 2026Burst Container or Vessel
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. NO CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTING FACTOR WAS IDENTIFIED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24157995 ↗
Other Medtronic, Inc. products
- CapSureFix Novus MRI SureScan29 models · 87,337 reports
- Medtronic Sprint Quattro Lead67 models · 45,880 reports · 1 recall
- Intellis AdaptiveStim3 models · 35,469 reports
- SYNCHROMED II11 models · 32,260 reports · 4 recalls
- CAPSUREFIX NOVUS17 models · 27,547 reports
- INTERSTIM30 models · 24,415 reports · 1 recall
- Sprint Quattro Secure S MRI SureScan7 models · 23,549 reports
- Medtronic LINQ Heart Monitor11 models · 19,366 reports · 3 recalls
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page