Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6620525Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · IMPLANT G6620525 NP PARAL 5MMX15MMX12MM · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Divergence Anterior Cervical Fusion System (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169337909), received between Aug 29, 2019 and Aug 22, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Crack1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 22, 2025Fracture; Fracture
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES (MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE, HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, DISTRIBUTOR) REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGICAL PLACEMENT OF THE IMPLANT BY THE PHYSICIAN A FRACTURE OCCURRED ON THE UPPER ANTERIOR SURFACE OF THE IMPLANT. THE DAMAGE WAS IDENTIFIED DURING THE PROCEDURE AND APPEARED TO RESULT FROM MECHANICAL STRESS APPLIED DURING THE POSITIONING OR FIXATION PROGRESS THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS AN ANTERIOR CERVICAL SPINAL FUSION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22870255 ↗MalfunctionMay 24, 2024Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) <(>&<)> DISTRIBUTOR VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT IM PLANTED WITH STAND-ALONE INTERBODY CAGE HAVING C5, C6, C7 CERVICAL FUSION THERAPY FOR HERNIATED DISC. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS BROKEN WHEN THE DOCTOR INSERTS THE SCREW INTO THE IMPLANT TO FIX IT. THE DAMAGED IMPLANT WAS REPLACED BY THE DOCTOR AND A NEW IMPLANT WAS IMPLANTED. THERE WAS A DELAY OF 30 MINUTES IN THE OVERALL PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19389603 ↗MalfunctionMay 31, 2021Crack; Crack
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING SPINAL DEVICES USED FOR UNKNOWN SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED WHEN WE PUT THE SCREW IN THERE WAS A CRACK IN THE IMPLANT WHICH LIKELY WAS CREATED FROM IMPACTING THE IMPLANT. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVED IN THE EVENT AND NO SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED.(B)(6) 2021 E1 (REP): ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT ONE IMPLANT BROKE, AND 2 CRACKED. THE CRACKED BETWEEN THE SCREW HOLE AND EDGE OF THE IMPLANT. THERE WAS NO BROKEN FRAGMENT WAS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. NO REVISION WAS PLANNED AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH NEW IMPLANT. THIS WAS A REVISION OF A PREVIOUSLY FUSED C4-7 POSTERIORLY. THE SURGEON DID A C4-7ACDF ON THIS PATIENT AND IT WAS ON THE ANTERIOR THAT THE IMPLANTS BROKE. LEVELS IMPLANTED WAS C4/5, C5/6, C6/7. THE PRODUCT WAS CAME INTO CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. B)(6) 2021 E2 (REP): ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT PRODUCT NUMBER: G6620525 LOT NUMBER: H5677212 - BROKEN, PRODUCT NUMBER: G6620525 LOT NUMBER: H5677212 - CRACKED AND PRODUCT NUMBER: G6620525 LOT NUMBER: H5461021 - CRACKED. THE REPORTED THREE PROD
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11907241 ↗MalfunctionAug 29, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT CERVICAL ARTHRODESIS. INTRA-OP, THE CAGE BROKE DURING IMPLANTATION. THE BROKEN CAGE WAS COMPLETELY EXPLANTED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8947455 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices
- NA 03.617.902Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical103 reports
- NA 03.617.900Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical77 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626525Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical75 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626526Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical49 reports
- NA 03.617.905Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical29 reports
- NA 03.617.904Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical27 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626746Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical21 reports
- NA 03.647.972Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical17 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page