Skip to content

CD HORIZON® SOLERA® Spinal System 54850016540Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · MAS 54850016540 4.75 EXT TAB CANN 6.5X40 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of CD HORIZON SOLERA Spinal System (34)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
11
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169491328), received between Feb 28, 2018 and Jul 17, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 10 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (7 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 2 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 4 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520264
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break7
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Material Deformation1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions10
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque3

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 17, 2026Material Deformation

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES (HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, DISTRIBUTOR) REGARDING A SCREW USED ON PATIENT HAVING PERCUTANEOUS PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION OF THE LUMBAR SPINE FOR L2 VERTEBRAL BODY FRACTURE (TYPE B2), MULTIPLE TRAUMA DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING SURGERY, THE MULTI AXIAL SCREW AND SET SCREW WERE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE, BUT THE INNER LOCKING SCREW COULD NOT BE PROPERLY ENGAGED AFTER THREE INSERTION ATTEMPTS. UPON REMOVAL, DAMAGED (STRIPPED) THREADS AT THE SCREW HEAD WERE IDENTIFIED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25855291 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 27, 2025Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION SPINAL THERAPY AT L5-S1. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A BROKEN SCREW WAS DETECTED IN S1 ON THE RIGHT. THE BROKEN SCREW WAS IDENTIFIED WHILE THE IMPLANTS REMAINED IN PLACE, AND THE SPECIFIC BATCH OF THE BROKEN SCREW WAS NOT DETERMINED. THERE WERE UNKNOWN PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO PLANS TO PERFORM REVISION SURGERY TO REPLACE THE BROKEN SCREW IN S1 ON THE RIGHT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23388571 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 27, 2025Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION SPINAL THERAPY AT L5-S1. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A BROKEN SCREW WAS DETECTED IN S1 ON THE RIGHT. THE BROKEN SCREW WAS IDENTIFIED WHILE THE IMPLANTS REMAINED IN PLACE, AND THE SPECIFIC BATCH OF THE BROKEN SCREW WAS NOT DETERMINED. THERE WERE UNKNOWN PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO PLANS TO PERFORM REVISION SURGERY TO REPLACE THE BROKEN SCREW IN S1 ON THE RIGHT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23388569 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 27, 2025Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION SPINAL THERAPY AT L5-S1. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A BROKEN SCREW WAS DETECTED IN S1 ON THE RIGHT. THE BROKEN SCREW WAS IDENTIFIED WHILE THE IMPLANTS REMAINED IN PLACE, AND THE SPECIFIC BATCH OF THE BROKEN SCREW WAS NOT DETERMINED. THERE WERE UNKNOWN PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO PLANS TO PERFORM REVISION SURGERY TO REPLACE THE BROKEN SCREW IN S1 ON THE RIGHT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23388566 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 27, 2025Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION SPINAL THERAPY AT L5-S1. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A BROKEN SCREW WAS DETECTED IN S1 ON THE RIGHT. THE BROKEN SCREW WAS IDENTIFIED WHILE THE IMPLANTS REMAINED IN PLACE, AND THE SPECIFIC BATCH OF THE BROKEN SCREW WAS NOT DETERMINED. THERE WERE UNKNOWN PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO PLANS TO PERFORM REVISION SURGERY TO REPLACE THE BROKEN SCREW IN S1 ON THE RIGHT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23388565 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 29, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING SACROILIAC AND THORACOLUMBAR THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SOLERA 4.75 VOYAGER SCREW ON THE RIGHT SIDE HAS POPPED OUT OF THE PEDICLE AFTER BEING PLACED. THE SURGEON TOOK OUT THE SCREW AND DID NOT REPLACE IT.  THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RE CEIVED FROM MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THERE WERE UNKNOWN PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE SCREW WAS NOT RETURNED BECAUSE IT WAS PLACED BACK INSIDE OF THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22102892 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 28, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE SCREW WAS NOT RETURNED BECAUSE IT WAS REPOSITIONED AND PLACED BACK INSIDE THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22094289 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 20, 2024Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT, THE TULIP HEAD SHEARED OFF WHILE FINAL TIGHTENING THE SCREW. SURGEON REMOVED THE BROKEN IMPLANT AND THE BROKEN PIECE, REPLACED WITH ANOTHER SCREW. PROCEDURE/TECHNIQUE PERFORMED WAS TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20731792 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 3, 2021Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WHO HAD FUSION L5/S1 DUE TO SCOLIOSIS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR FOUND OUT THAT THE SCREW HEADS WERE APART FROM THE SCREW BODY IN CT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS/ COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11936659 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 3, 2021Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WHO HAD FUSION L5/S1 DUE TO SCOLIOSIS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR FOUND OUT THAT THE SCREW HEADS WERE APART FROM THE SCREW BODY IN CT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS/ COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11927333 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 28, 2018Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT UNSPECIFIED SURGERY. DURING SURGERY, ONE OF THE EXTENDED TABS WAS RETAINED IN THE PATIENT. THIS WAS DISCOVERED IN THE FOLLOW UP AND REVISION SURGERY HAD BEEN SCHEDULED ON (B)(6) 2018. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 7302165 ↗

Other Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation devices

All Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page