MiniMed® 530G MMT-551RNALRecalls & reported problems
Medtronic Minimed, Inc. · PUMP MMT-551RNAL PRDGM V3.0 CL US RC · Class 3
All models of MiniMed 530G (71)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169507937), received between Jul 14, 2017 and Oct 10, 2019 — classified as 4 injuries, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (2 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P120010); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Crack2
- Application Interface Becomes Non-Functional Or Program Exits Abnormally1
- Break1
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
- Inaccurate Delivery1
- Insufficient Flow or Under Infusion1
- Moisture or Humidity Problem1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
- Hyperglycemia3
- Hypoglycemia2
- Blood Loss1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 10, 2019No Apparent Adverse Event; Patient Device Interaction Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event; Patient Device Interaction Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEIR INSULIN PUMP WAS DAMAGED. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 360 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT AND THERE WAS BLOOD ON SITE. CUSTOMER STATES THAT DAMAGE OCCURRED DUE TO CRACK ON RESERVOIR LIP RING BUT HE DID NOT DROP THE INSULIN PUMP. CUSTOMER ALSO STATES THAT RESERVOIR WAS ABLE TO LOCK IN PLACE WHEN INSERTED INTO INSULIN PUMP. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACK-UP PLAN. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Blood Loss
MAUDE report 9173895 ↗MalfunctionSep 6, 2018Power Problem; Power Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEIR INSULIN PUMP RECEIVED FAILED BATTERY TEST ALARM. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 124 MG/DL. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT FAILED BATTERY TEST ALARM REOCCUR WITH EACH NEW BATTERY INSERTED. CUSTOMER REPORTS CONTACTS ARE NOT MISSING OR DAMAGED. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7853228 ↗InjuryMay 16, 2018Inaccurate Delivery
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE OF 50 MG/DL. CUSTOMER¿S CURRENT BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 102 MG/DL.THE CUSTOMER TREATED WITH FOOD. TROUBLESHOOTING WAS DONE FOR LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP APPEARS NORMAL. THE CUSTOMER WAS NEITHER IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM, NOR ADMITTED INTO HOSPITAL AS A RESULT OF LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE. BASED ON CUSTOMER REPORT CUSTOMER DOES NOT ALLEGE PUMP WAS UNDER OR OVER DELIVERING. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS
Patient problems: Hypoglycemia
MAUDE report 7517460 ↗MalfunctionJan 18, 2018Insufficient Flow or Under Infusion
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE PUMP WAS UNDER DELIVERING INSULIN. THE CUSTOMER¿S CURRENT BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS OVER 300 MG/DL AT TIME OF INCIDENT AND CURRENT BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS 178 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER¿S THEY HAD ISSUES WITH PUMP AND HAD HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE AND WAS TREATED WITH MANUAL INJECTION. THE CUSTOMER ALLEGED INSULIN PUMP WAS UNDER DELIVERING AND THEY HAD BEEN HAVING HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE. TROUBLESHOOTING WAS PERFORMED. THE CUSTOMER WAS THE PUMP WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED. THE CUSTOMER WAS TO REVERT TO BACK UP PLAN PER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL INSTRUCTIONS UNTIL REPLACEMENT ARRIVES. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 7203941 ↗InjuryDec 11, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY EXPERIENCED HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL OF 590 MG/DL. HE TOOK 20 UNITS OF INSULIN AND HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS NOT COMING DOWN. THE CUSTOMER ALSO HAD BLOOD GLUCOSE OF 480 MG/DL. CUSTOMER STATED HE TOOK A LONG WALK AND HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS AROUND 270 MG/DL. CUSTOMER STATED HIS SENSOR GLUCOSE WAS READING 400 MG/DL. WHEN THE CUSTOMER GOT HOME AROUND 6 PM, HIS METER SAID IT WAS TOO HIGH TO TEST. CUSTOMER THEN TOOK 12 UNITS OF INSULIN AND AND THEN 8 MORE UNITS OF INSULIN. CUSTOMER'S BLOOD GLUCOSE LAST TIME HE CHECKED WAS 450 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER¿S CURRENT BLOOD GLUCOSE WAS 423 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER TREATED WITH BOLUS FROM INSULIN PUMP. THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS NORMAL. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia
MAUDE report 7105318 ↗InjuryDec 8, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY WERE HOSPITALIZE DUE TO LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL 28 MG/DL. THE CUSTOMER¿S HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE 27 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER¿S HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE 168 MG/DL AT THE TIME OF CALL. THE CUSTOMER HAD TREATED WITH GLUCOSE TABLETS PRIOR TO HOSPITALIZATION. THE DRIVE SUPPORT CAP WAS NORMAL. THE CUSTOMER DECLINED TROUBLESHOOTING. CUSTOMER WAS WEARING THE INSULIN PUMP AT TIME OF HOSPITALIZATION. THE INSULIN PUMP WAS NOT RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7101192 ↗InjurySep 1, 2017Break; Crack; Device Operates Differently Than Expected
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THEY INSULIN PUMP WAS DAMAGED AND THAT THEY ALSO EXPERIENCED A LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL OF 54 MG/DL AFTER THE DAMAGE WAS DISCOVERED. THE CUSTOMER THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO TIGHTEN THE BATTERY CAP WHEN THEY HEARD A CRACK. THE CUSTOMER ALSO MENTIONED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP WENT INTO THRESHOLD SUSPEND. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TREATING FOR A HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE OF 188 MG/DL AND 273 MG/DL WITH THE INSULIN PUMP BOLUS. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEIR CURRENT BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL DURING THE CALL WAS 58 MG/DL AFTER TREATING WITH GLUCOSE TABS AND PROTEIN MILK SHAKE. TROUBLESHOOTING FOR DAMAGE WAS PERFORMED AND THE BATTERY COMPARTMENT WAS FOUND DAMAGED. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AND WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACKUP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia
MAUDE report 6837739 ↗MalfunctionAug 28, 2017Crack; Moisture or Humidity Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THAT THE INSULIN PUMP HAD FLUID UNDER ITS LCD SCREEN. THE PATIENT'S BLOOD GLUCOSE AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT IS UNKNOWN. DURING TROUBLESHOOTING THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE INSULIN PUMP WAS SITTING ON THE SHELF IN THE BATHROOM DURING HER SHOWER. SHE NOTED A SMALL CRACK IN THE SCREEN WHEN THERE WAS CONDENSATION, BUT THE CRACK DID NOT APPEAR ANYMORE. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND REVERT TO HER MEDICALLY PRESCRIBED BACKUP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6826144 ↗MalfunctionJul 14, 2017Application Interface Becomes Non-Functional Or Program Exits Abnormally
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED VIA PHONE CALL THE INSULIN PUMP WOULD NOT EXIT THE PREPARING TO PRIME SCREEN. THE CUSTOMER¿S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL WAS UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CUSTOMER MENTIONED THAT THEY HAVE BEEN HAVING HIGH BLOOD GLUCOSE FOR THE PAST FEW DAYS BUT DECLINED TO TROUBLESHOOT FOR THE HIGH READINGS. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEY WERE UNABLE TO COMPLETE A SET CHANGE. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO HOLD DOWN THE ACT BUTTON UNTIL RECEIVING A SECOND SERIES OF BEEPS AND/OR NUMBERS APPEAR ON THE DISPLAY. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEY DID NOT RECEIVE THE BEEPS NOR DID THE NUMBERS APPEAR ON THE SCREEN. THE CUSTOMER WAS ADVISED TO DISCONTINUE USE OF THE INSULIN PUMP AND TO REVERT TO THE BACK-UP PLAN. THE INSULIN PUMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6714123 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P120010. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1751-2026 · Feb 13, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedMiniMed 530G Insulin Pump (MMT-551, MMT-751)
- Z-2544-2014 · Mar 13, 2014 · TerminatedMedtronic MiniMed Paradigm Insulin Infusion Pumps, Paradigm models: MMT-511, MMT-512, MMT-712, MMT-712E, MMT-515, MMT-715, MMT-522, MMT-522K, MMT-722, MMT-722K, MMT-523, MMT-523K
Other Artificial pancreas device system, threshold suspend devices
- t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Basal-IQ 1000886Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. · Automated Insulin Dosing , Threshold Suspend1 recall17 deaths108,656 reports
- MiniMed® 630G MMT-1715KMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Artificial pancreas device system, threshold suspend4 recalls98 deaths35,170 reports
- t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Basal-IQ 1000912Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. · Automated Insulin Dosing , Threshold Suspend1 recall2 deaths30,219 reports
- t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Basal-IQ 1000898Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. · Automated Insulin Dosing , Threshold Suspend1 recall6 deaths16,106 reports
- MiniMed® 630G MMT-1715KMMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Artificial pancreas device system, threshold suspend2 recalls50 deaths9,892 reports
- MiniMed® 630G MMT-1715KMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Automated insulin dosing , threshold suspend4 recalls36 deaths7,947 reports
- MiniMed® 530G MMT-751NASMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Artificial pancreas device system, threshold suspend36 deaths7,479 reports
- MiniMed®630G MMT-1715KMedtronic Minimed, Inc. · Artificial pancreas device system, threshold suspend2 recalls17 deaths6,645 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page