Skip to content

MOSAIC® 305C223 (UDI 00643169594692)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · VLV 305C223 MOSAIC AOR CII US PEEK · Class 3 · Implant

All models of MOSAIC (59)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
14
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
14
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 14 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169594692), received between Jun 25, 2018 and Mar 9, 2026 — classified as 14 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (8 reports).

3 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P990064); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 2 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information8
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Device Stenosis3
  • Intravalvular regurgitation3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Gradient Increase1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis5
  • Insufficient Information5
  • Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation3
  • No Information3
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Bradycardia1
  • Calcium Deposits/Calcification1
  • Dyspnea1

Recent adverse event reports

The 14 most recent of 14 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 9, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Stenosis; Intravalvular regurgitation

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 8 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 23MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24553085 ↗
  • InjuryMar 11, 2025Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 3 DAYS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 23MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS SICK SINUS SYNDROME AND INCOMPLETE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Non specific EKG/ECG Changes

    MAUDE report 21574901 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 10, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Intravalvular regurgitation; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Intravalvular regurgitation

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT REPORTED THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED WITH SYMPTOMS OF SHORTNESS OF BREATH AND FLUID RETENTION. SUBSEQUENTLY, AFTER AN UNKNOWN DURATION, ANOTHER MANUFACTURERS TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED AS AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY OF UNKNOWN SEVERITY. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Dyspnea; Insufficient Information; Pulmonary Edema

    MAUDE report 21343844 ↗
  • InjuryJan 27, 2025Gradient Increase; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Stenosis; Gradient Increase; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Stenosis

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 7 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21242446 ↗
  • InjuryOct 22, 2024Intravalvular regurgitation; Intravalvular regurgitation

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 2 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED AS MODERATE AORTIC REGURGITATION (AR). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation

    MAUDE report 20504247 ↗
  • InjuryOct 14, 2024Thickening of Material; Device Stenosis; Thickening of Material; Device Stenosis

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 1 YEAR AND 3 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, THE PATIENT IS BEING EVALUATED FOR A TRANSCATHETER VALVE-IN-VALVE REPLACEMENT. THE REASON FOR EVALUATION WAS REPORTED AS AORTIC STENOSIS (AS) AND POSSIBLE HYPOATTENUATED LEAFLET THICKENING (HALT). AN ANTICOAGULANT MEDICATION WAS PRESCRIBED. IT WAS STATED THAT CALCIUM WAS SEEN IN THE LEFT VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW TRACT (LVOT) UNDER THE RIGHT CORONARY CUSP AND NONCORONARY CUSP. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Calcium Deposits/Calcification

    MAUDE report 20440504 ↗
  • InjuryDec 19, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 4 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 23MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A 23MM TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16007423 ↗
  • InjuryNov 22, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 1 YEAR AND 3 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 23MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 21MM VALVE OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15842059 ↗
  • InjuryMar 31, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 4 DAYS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 23MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED TO BE DUE TO COMPLETE HEART BLOCK. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Heart Block

    MAUDE report 13971525 ↗
  • InjurySep 10, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 2 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE DUE TO STENOSIS. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 12452680 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THE SAME DAY POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS SINUS BRADYCARDIA. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Bradycardia

    MAUDE report 10442541 ↗
  • InjuryMar 19, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 23MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON MEDTRONIC DEVICE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 9853372 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2020Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT IMMEDIATELY POST IMPLANT OF THIS 23MM BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE OF THE SAME SIZE AND MODEL. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS REPORTED AS A TEAR IN ONE OF THE LEAFLETS. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE TEAR COULD HAVE BEEN INTRODUCED DURING THE IMPLANT PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 9780432 ↗
  • InjuryJun 25, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THIS 23 MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE WAS IMPLANTED AND EXPLANTED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER 23 MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE FOR UNKNOWN REASONS. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7635474 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P990064. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1880-2019 · May 21, 2019 · Terminated
    Mosaic 310 Bioprosthesis, Mitral, REF 310C29 - Product Usage: Replacement of malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves.
  • Z-1881-2019 · May 21, 2019 · Terminated
    Mosaic 310 Bioprosthesis, Mitral, REF 310C31 - Product Usage: Replacement of malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves.
  • Z-1225-2009 · Jan 26, 2009 · Terminated
    Medtronic Mosaic Porcine Bioprostheses with Cinch, Heart Valve; Model 305; Catalog #s 305C21AA, 305C2701, 305C2301, 305C2501, and 305C2901; Sterile LC; Rx only; Medtronic Inc 710 M

Other heart-valve, non-allograft tissue devices

All heart-valve, non-allograft tissue devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page