Skip to content

KyphPak® First Fracture Tray KEX152EB-CDS-Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · KIT KEX152EB-CDS- 15/2 FF WITH CDS · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169671645), received between Nov 7, 2019 and Nov 18, 2025 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Eject” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 2 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Eject2
  • Nonstandard Device2
  • Break1
  • Explosion1
  • Failure to Fire1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Material Rupture1
  • Mechanical Jam1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 18, 2025Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM USER FACILITY VIA MANUFACTURING REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PRODUCT IDENTIFIED DURING AN EVENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GUN WOULD NOT PUSH THE CEMENT OUT IF THE CARTRIDGE AND INTO THE BONE FILLER DEVICE. NO PATIENT INVOLVED IN THIS EVENT. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED/ANTICIPATED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23578519 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 23, 2025Nonstandard Device; Failure to Fire; Explosion; Nonstandard Device; Failure to Fire; Explosion

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING SPINAL THERAPY. PRE-OP DIAGNOSIS OF PATIENT WAS COMPRESSION FRACTURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CEMENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (CDS) MALFUNCTIONED, AS THE CEMENT DID NOT ADVANCE INTO THE BODY DESPITE REPEATED ATTEMPTS. IT WAS KEPT PUMPING THE HANDLE OF THE GUN BUT THERE WAS NO ADVANCEMENT OF THE CEMENT AND NOTICED THAT SALINE WAS DRIPPING AND THEN THE BAG EXPLODED INSIDE THE GUN AND WATER WENT EVERYWHERE. THIS NECESSITATED THE REPLACEMENT OF THE GUN. ADDITIONALLY, THE CEMENT WAS DESCRIBED AS TOO VISCOUS, NOT DOUGHY OR HOMOGENOUS PRIOR TO DELIVERY, AND SUBSEQUENTLY HARDENED TOO QUICKLY, CAUSING FURTHER PROCEDURAL DELAYS. A NEW BATCH OF CEMENT WAS MIXED, BUT IT ALSO HARDENED IMMEDIATELY, REQUIRING ANOTHER BATCH TO BE PREPARED. PROCEDURE/TECHNIQUE PERFORMED WAS KYPHOPLASTY. THE PROCEDURE WAS ULTIMATELY COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING A NEW PRODUCT. THE LEVEL PLANNED TO TREAT WAS T12. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21889655 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2025Failure to Eject; Failure to Eject

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING BALLOON KYPHOPLASTY FOR AN INDICATION OF VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BONE CEMENT, ALTHOUGH PREPARED AS USUAL, WAS DIFFICULT TO PUSH ONCE MIXED, LEADING TO PARTIAL FILLING AND SUBSEQUENT BLOCKAGE. THIS ISSUE PERSISTED EVEN AFTER OPENING ANOTHER KIT. THE PROBLEM WAS RESOLVED BY REMOVING THE "T" PIECE, ALLOWING THE CEMENT TO PUSH FREELY, AND THE CASE CONTINUED AS EXPECTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW PRODUCT. THERE A DELAY IN OVERALL PROCEDURE TIME. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21615935 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2025Failure to Eject; Failure to Eject

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING BALLOON KYPHOPL ASTY FOR AN INDICATION OF VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BONE CEMENT, ALTHOUGH PREPARED AS USUAL, WAS DIFFICULT TO PUSH ONCE MIXED, LEADING TO PARTIAL FILLING AND SUBSEQUENT BLOCKAGE. THIS ISSUE PERSISTED EVEN AFTER OPENING ANOTHER KIT. THE PROBLEM WAS RESOLVED BY REMOVING THE "T" PIECE, ALLOWING THE CEMENT TO PUSH FREELY, AND THE CASE CONTINUED AS EXPECTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW PRODUCT. THERE IS A DELAY IN OVERALL PROCEDURE TIME. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21615930 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 8, 2024Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING AN EVENT WHICH OCCURRED DURING AN UNKNOWN SPINAL PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT ONE OF THE KIS INFLATION SYRINGES BROKE APART ONCE HCP TRIED TO INFLATE THE BALLOON. THE OTHER INFLATION KIS SYRINGE WAS USED AT THAT ENTRY POINT AND THE HCP WAS NOT ABLE TO SEE DYE INFLATE THE BALLOON EVEN THOUGH HE TURNED THE HANDLE AND MOVED 1.0 TO 2.0 ML OF DYE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20398499 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 24, 2024Nonstandard Device; Material Deformation; Nonstandard Device; Material Deformation

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE FACILITY VIA A MEDTRONIC REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A BEVELED TROCAR TO BE USED IN AN UNKNOWN SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE KIT WAS OPENED AND SCRUB TECH NOTICED THE BEVEL TROCAR LOOKED ¿WEIRD.¿ THE INNER STYLET OF THE BEVELED TROCAR APPEARED SHORT AND DAMAGED AT THE TIP. T34B WAS USED AS REPLACEMENT. THE CASE WENT ON WITHOUT ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED IN THE EVENT. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED/ ANTICIPATED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19171486 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 7, 2019Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SPINAL SURGERY DUE TO VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE. INTRA-OP, THE IBT RUPTURED. THE BALLOON FOLDED IN ON ITSELF AND BECAME STUCK ON THE TROCAR PREVENTING REMOVAL. THE ENTIRE TROCAR HAD TO BE REMOVED AND THE DEFORMED BALLOON NEEDED TO BE SEQUENTIALLY PULLED WITH A KELLEY CLAMP TO REMOVE IT FROM THE TROCAR TRACT OUT OF THE PATIENT. THE RUPTURE INITIALLY OCCURRED WITH MINIMAL EXPOSURE TO CEMENT USING THE CEMENT RESISTANCE TECHNIQUE. CONTACT TIME WAS LESS THAN 30 SECONDS. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9289068 ↗

Other ARTHROSCOPE devices

All ARTHROSCOPE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page