Skip to content

Evera MRI™ S DR SureScan™ DDMC3D1 (UDI 00643169929258)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · ICD-DR DDMC3D1 EVERA MRI S US DF1 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Evera MRI S DR SureScan (8)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
11
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
9
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169929258), received between Feb 6, 2019 and Aug 12, 2026 — classified as 9 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation4
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Device Sensing Problem3
  • Electromagnetic Interference2
  • Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem1
  • Impedance Problem1
  • Incorrect Measurement1
  • Low impedance1

Patient problems

  • Shock from Patient Lead(s)4
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Unspecified Infection2
  • Erosion1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Sepsis1
  • Syncope/Fainting1

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 12, 2026Signal Artifact/Noise; Electromagnetic Interference

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50222375 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 23, 2024Electromagnetic Interference; Over-Sensing; Electromagnetic Interference; Over-Sensing

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS POTENTIAL ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE (EMI) AND OVERSENSING NOTED ON STORED ELECTROGRAMS. THE IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) REMAINS IN USE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20047720 ↗
  • InjurySep 15, 2023Incorrect Measurement; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Low impedance; Impedance Problem; Incorrect Measurement; Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem; Low impedance; Impedance Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVED AN SHOCK FROM THEIR IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) FOR AN EPISODE DETECTED IN THE VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION (VF) ZONE. REVIEW OF THE EPISODE DATA SHOWED THAT MORE THAN THE PROGRAMMED HIGH-VOLTAGE ENERGY HAD BEEN DELIVERED. FOLLOWING THE HIGH-VOLTAGE THERAPY FOR VF, THERE WAS A SUBSEQUENT FALSE DROP IN PACING IMPEDANCE ON ALL PATHWAYS WHICH TRIGGERED ALERTS, AND A FALSE DECLINE IN BATTERY VOLTAGE. THE ICD WAS LATER EXPLANTED AND REPLACED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17756677 ↗
  • InjuryMay 25, 2023Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation; Device Sensing Problem; Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation; Device Sensing Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVED SHOCKS FOR ATRIAL TACHYCARDIA/ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AT/AF) WITH RAPID VENTRICULAR RESPONSE (RVR) THAT WAS DETECTED AS VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION (VF). THE DEVICE REMAINS IN USE. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Shock from Patient Lead(s)

    MAUDE report 17001406 ↗
  • InjuryJun 21, 2021Pacing Problem; Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation; Device Sensing Problem; Pacing Problem; Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation; Device Sensing Problem

    IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE RHYTHM WAS DETERMINED TO BE VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (VT) AND THE PATIENT WAS SYNCOPAL.

    Patient problems: Shock from Patient Lead(s); Syncope/Fainting

    MAUDE report 12032890 ↗
  • InjuryMar 4, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) SYSTEM WAS REMOVED DUE TO SEPSIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Sepsis

    MAUDE report 11417612 ↗
  • InjurySep 2, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO INFECTION AND LEAD EROSION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Erosion; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10485404 ↗
  • InjuryMar 28, 2020Unable to Obtain Readings; Reset Problem; Unable to Obtain Readings; Reset Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) EXPERIENCED A RESET, AND DISPLAYED INVALID DATA. IT WAS DETER MINED THAT THE PATIENT HAD UNDERGONE RADIATION THERAPY. THE RESET WAS CLEARED, AND THE DEVICE REMAINS IN USE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9894983 ↗
  • InjurySep 6, 2019Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation; Device Sensing Problem; Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation; Device Sensing Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) DELIVERED A SHOCK FOR VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION (VF) THAT APPEARED TO BE AN ATRIAL ARRHYTHMIA WITH RAPID VENTRICULAR RESPONSE. THE ICD REMAINS IN USE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Shock from Patient Lead(s)

    MAUDE report 8970285 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 22, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAS A SYSTEMIC INFECTION AND ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT WAS NECESSARY. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SOURCE OF THE SYSTEMIC INFECTION IS UNKNOWN. THE PATIENT¿S IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) SYSTEM WAS EXPLANTED. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8361790 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2019Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation; Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE PATIENT THAT THEY RECEIVED SHOCKS FROM THEIR IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD). FOLLOW UP WITH THE PATIENT'S PHYSICIAN NOTED THAT THE SHOCKS WERE INAPPROPRIATE BUT NO MALFUNCTION WAS NOTED. THE DEVICE WAS REPROGRAMMED AND THE PATIENT'S MEDICATIONS WERE ADJUSTED. THE DEVICE REMAINS IN USE. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Shock from Patient Lead(s)

    MAUDE report 8309883 ↗

Other Pulse generator, permanent, implantable devices

All Pulse generator, permanent, implantable devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page