Skip to content

NRG Transseptal Needle NRG-71-C0Recalls & reported problems

Baylis Médicale Cie Inc · Class 2

All models of NRG Transseptal Needle (8)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00685447004332), received between Jan 27, 2026 and Jan 27, 2026 — classified as 1 death.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Cardiac Arrest1
  • Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • DeathJan 27, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A CARDIAC ARREST OCCURRED AND THE PATIENT PASSED AWAY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN NRG TRANSSEPTAL NEEDLE WAS SELECTED FOR USE DURING A CONCOMITANT PULSED FIELD ABLATION (PFA) AND THEN WATCHMAN PROCEDURE TO TREAT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AFIB). FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE PROCEDURE, ALL PRODUCTS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. A NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DEVICE WAS REQUESTED AND THE PATIENT WAS PREPARED FOR THE USE OF IT. ONCE TRANSSEPTAL WAS ACHIEVED, A NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SHEATH WAS EXCHANGED FOR A NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DELIVERY SHEATH. A NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC PIGTAIL CATHETER WAS INSERTED, AND THE PATIENT BLOOD PRESSURE DROPPED. A CARDIAC ARREST WAS REPORTED. A CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION (CPR) WAS ADMINISTRATED WHEN PACING COULD NOT BE CAPTURED. AFTER SEVERAL MINUTES OF ATTEMPTED TO STABILIZE THE PATIENT, A CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY WAS PERFORMED. A NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DEVICE WAS PLACED INTO THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL BEYOND THE STANDARD COURSE OF CARE. THE WATCHMAN PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED. THE NRG NEEDLE WAS NOT IN THE BODY AT THE TIME OF THE ISSUE HAPPENED, AND ACCORDING TO THE PHYSICIAN, THE DEVICE DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE EVENT. LATER, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE

    Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest; Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension

    MAUDE report 24193445 ↗

Other Catheter, Septostomy devices

All Catheter, Septostomy devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page