Skip to content

SureFlex Steerable Guiding Sheath TSK0005 (REF NA)Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · SureFlex Steerable Sheath; Transseptal Dilator; J-Tip Guidewire · Class 2

All models of SureFlex Steerable Guiding Sheath (6)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00685447006220), received between Apr 14, 2023 and Feb 20, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Leak/Splash” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Leak/Splash2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Defective Device1
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Cardiac Perforation1
  • Cardiac Tamponade1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 20, 2024Leak/Splash; Defective Device; Leak/Splash; Defective Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A BMC STEERABLE SHEATH (SUREFLEX) AND NRG RF NEEDLE WERE SELECTED FOR USE DURING AN ABLATION PROCEDURE. THE TIP OF THE NRG RF NEEDLE BROKE WHEN USING THE RF NEEDLE. IT PASSED THROUGH THE FORAMEN OVALE WITHOUT ENERGIZING, SO IT WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT ENERGIZING. ADDITIONALLY, WHEN USING SUREFLEX DURING PRE-MAPPING, THE HEMOSTATIC VALVE SEEMED TO FAIL OR BLOOD BEGAN TO LEAK, THUS THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATION WAS REPORTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE DEVICES ARE NOT EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. IT WAS FURTHER INFORMED THAT THE NRG NEEDLE WAS ABLE TO CROSS THE FORAMEN OVALE WITHOUT PERFORMING ENERGIZATION (RADIO FREQUENCY WAS NOT DELIVERED). NO ALERT OR ERROR WAS REPORTED. SINCE THE PROCEDURE WAS ABLE TO BE COMPLETED WITHOUT ENERGIZATION, RF WAS NOT DELIVERED. ADDITIONALLY, THE LEAK WAS IDENTIFIED WHEN USING SUREFLEX DURING PRE-MAPPING, BLOOD BEGAN TO LEAK FROM HEMOSTASTIC VALVE (SLOW DRIP). IT APPEARS THAT THE LEAK WAS COMING FROM THE HEMOSTATIC VALVE. NO FLUID WAS LEAKING FROM THE DISTAL OR PROXIMAL END OF THE HANDLE. BLOOD WAS NOTED LEAKING, WHICH STOPPED USING THE DEVICE (SUREFLEX). NO LEAK AIR WAS REPORTED. NO AIR

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18743723 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 17, 2023Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A BMC STEERABLE SHEATH WAS SELECTED FOR USE DURING AN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (A FIB). DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS BACK FLOW FROM THE HEMOSTATIC VALVE (IT IS SAID THAT BLOOD LEAKED (A FEW DROPS DRIPPING) FROM THE INSERTION SITE DURING REVERSE BLOOD FLOW), THUS ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED AND PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. THE DEVICE IS NOT EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS (DISCARDED). NO OTHER ISSUES WERE REPORTED. THE DILATOR WAS WIPED OUT PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO THE VALVE, IT'S PROBABLY MOISTENED BECAUSE IT WAS FLASHED DURING SETUP. NO CLINICAL EVENT OCCURRED DUE TO BLOOD LOSS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17564825 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 3, 2023Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE A SUREFLEX STEERABLE GUIDING SHEATH WAS SELECTED FOR USE. THE JOINT BETWEEN THE SHEATH AND DILATOR PEELED OFF DURING A PUNCTURE ATTEMPT AND PUNCTURE WAS NOT POSSIBLE. THE SHEATH WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME MODEL AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. THE DEVICE IS NOT EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16860138 ↗
  • InjuryApr 14, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    DURING THE ATRIAL SEPTAL PUNCTURE A NRG TRANSSEPTAL NEEDLE AND SUREFLEX STEERABLE GUIDING SHEATH WERE SELECTED FOR USE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ROOF PART OF THE RIGHT ATRIUM WAS DAMAGED, RESULTING IN CARDIAC TAMPONADE. PERICARDIOCENTESIS WAS PERFORMED UNDER ECHO GUIDE, HOWEVER, THE BLEEDING DID NOT STOP. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER HOSPITAL. IT WAS SUSPECTED THAT THE DAMAGE NOTED IN THE RIGHT ATRIUM WAS DUE TO THE RADIOFREQUENCY TRANSSEPTAL NEEDLE, BUT IT WAS NOT CONFIRMED. WHEN ROUTINE LEFT ATRIAL ANGIOGRAPHY WAS PERFORMED, IT WAS FOUND OUT THAT CARDIAC TAMPONADE OCCURRED DUE TO CONTRAST MEDIA ACCUMULATING IN THE PERICARDIUM AND NOT IN THE LEFT ATRIUM.

    Patient problems: Cardiac Perforation; Cardiac Tamponade

    MAUDE report 16743277 ↗

Other Introducer, Catheter devices

All Introducer, Catheter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page