Skip to content

FREESTYLE® 995MS27Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · VALVE 995MS27 FREESTYLE MS US · Class 3 · Implant

All models of FREESTYLE (33)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
10
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00721902316180), received between Feb 26, 2019 and Oct 15, 2024 — classified as 10 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (8 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information8
  • Calcified1
  • Degraded1
  • Gradient Increase1
  • Incomplete Coaptation1
  • Intravalvular regurgitation1
  • Perivalvular Leak1

Patient problems

  • Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation4
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis3
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Aortic Insufficiency1
  • Aortic Regurgitation1
  • Dyspnea1
  • Fatigue1
  • Valvular Insufficiency/ Regurgitation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 15, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 14 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 27MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 27MM VALVE OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20452966 ↗
  • InjuryDec 12, 2023Intravalvular regurgitation; Intravalvular regurgitation

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 12 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 27MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, THE PATIENT IS BEING EVALUATED FOR A TRANSCATHETER VALVE-IN-VALVE REPLACEMENT. THE REASON FOR EVALUATION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. SUBSEQUENTLY 17 DAYS LATER, THE PATIENT HAD AN AORTIC VALVE-IN-VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH A TRANSCATHETER VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED AS SEVERE AORTIC REGURGITATION (AR). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation

    MAUDE report 18312646 ↗
  • InjuryNov 28, 2022Calcified; Gradient Increase; Perivalvular Leak; Incomplete Coaptation; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Calcified; Gradient Increase; Perivalvular Leak; Incomplete Coaptation; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 10 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 27MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS NOT REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Insufficient Information; Valvular Insufficiency/ Regurgitation

    MAUDE report 15874045 ↗
  • InjuryJul 21, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 15 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 27MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, THE PATIENT IS BEING EVALUATED FOR A TRANSCATHETER VALVE-IN-VALVE REPLACEMENT. THE REASON FOR EVALUATION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WAS REPORTED. SUBSEQUENTLY, ONE DAY LATER, A 29MM TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED TO BE DUE TO MODERATE TO SEVERE AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation

    MAUDE report 15074291 ↗
  • InjuryApr 4, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 11 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, THE PATIENT IS BEING EVALUATED FOR A TRANSCATHETER VALVE-IN-VALVE REPLACEMENT. THE REASON FOR EVALUATION WAS REPORTED AS MODERATE TO SEVERE AORTIC REGURGITATION. NO INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. SUBSEQUENTLY 4 MONTHS LATER, THE PATIENT SUCCESSFULLY HAD AN AORTIC VALVE-IN-VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH A TRANSCATHETER VALVE. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation

    MAUDE report 13996555 ↗
  • InjuryMar 17, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 9 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 27MM BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED AS PROGRESSIVE AORTIC STENOSIS. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 11507829 ↗
  • InjuryOct 27, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 15 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE DUE TO MODERATE TO SEVERE AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Aortic Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 10741075 ↗
  • InjuryNov 15, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 14 YEARS AND 1 MONTH POST IMPLANT OF THIS 27MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS REPLACED VALVE-IN-VALVE WITH A 23MM TRANSCATHETER VALVE. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS REPORTED AS SEVERE AORTIC REGURGITATION. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Regurgitation

    MAUDE report 9328121 ↗
  • InjuryMay 22, 2019Degraded; Degraded

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM THE PATIENT THAT 10 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, THE VALVE WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A MECHANICAL VALVE. IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING FATIGUE AND SHORTNESS OF BREATH, AN ECHOCARDIOGRAM REVEALED THE VALVE WAS DETERIORATING, AND ULTIMATELY THE VALVE WAS REPLACED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Dyspnea; Fatigue

    MAUDE report 8631720 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 11 YEARS 9 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 27MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS REPLACED VALVE-IN-VALVE WITH A 29MM AORTIC TRANSCATHETER VALVE DUE TO "PURE" AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Insufficiency

    MAUDE report 8370545 ↗

Other heart-valve, non-allograft tissue devices

All heart-valve, non-allograft tissue devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page