truFreeze 2000181Recalls & reported problems
US Endoscopy · 16 FR CryoDecompression Tube (CDT) - Low Durometer is used with the truFreeze Spray Cryotherapy System. · Class 2
All models of truFreeze (6)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00724995199210), received between May 30, 2023 and Feb 4, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Use of Device Problem2
- Break1
- Difficult to Advance1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Mechanical Problem1
Patient problems
- Laceration(s) of Esophagus2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Crepitus1
- Perforation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 4, 2026Break
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE WIRE OF THEIR ACTIVE VENTING CRYO DECOMPRESSION TUBE "POKED" THE PATIENT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH ANOTHER ACTIVE VENTING CRYO DECOMPRESSION TUBE. NO REPORT OF INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24261044 ↗MalfunctionNov 21, 2025Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE OF THE ACTIVE VENTING CRYO DECOMPRESSION TUBE WENT THROUGH THE SHEATH CAUSING A SMALL CUT TO THE PATIENT'S ESOPHAGUS. NO MEDICAL TREATMENT WAS SOUGHT OR ADMINISTERED. THE PROCEDURE WAS CANCELLED AND RESCHEDULED FOR ANOTHER DAY.
Patient problems: Laceration(s) of Esophagus
MAUDE report 23622455 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE A STIFFENING WIRE, NORMALLY INTERNAL TO THE ACTIVE VENTING CRYO DECOMPRESSION TUBE, BECAME EXPOSED. AS A RESULT, THE PATIENT OBTAINED MUCOSAL DAMAGE IN THE UPPER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER FROM THE EXPOSED WIRE. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH A LIDOCAINE RINSE. THE PROCEDURE WAS DISCONTINUED AND RESCHEDULED AND COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AT A LATER DATE .
Patient problems: Laceration(s) of Esophagus
MAUDE report 22612538 ↗MalfunctionApr 17, 2025Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Advance
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE TWO WIRES OF THEIR CRYO DECOMPRESSION TUBE WERE EXPOSED AND RESISTANCE WAS FELT BY USER FACILITY PERSONNEL WHILE OPERATING THE TUBE. USER FACILITY PERSONNEL ATTEMPTED TO STRAIGHTEN OUT THE WIRING OF THE TUBING BUT WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY FOLLOWING A SHORT DELAY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROCEDURE, CREPITUS WAS NOTICED ON THE BACK OF THE PATIENT'S NECK. MEDICAL TREATMENT WAS ADMINISTERED TO REMOVE THE CREPITUS; HOWEVER, IT IS UNKNOWN WHAT TYPE OF MEDICAL TREATMENT WAS ADMINISTERED.
Patient problems: Crepitus
MAUDE report 21857508 ↗MalfunctionJun 8, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A TRUFREEZE SPRAY CRYOTHERAPY PROCEDURE, WIRES INSIDE THEIR CRYO DECOMPRESSION TUBE LOOSENED AND BEGAN TO PULL OUT OF THE TUBE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19493596 ↗MalfunctionMay 30, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT A PERFORATION WAS DETECTED IN A PATIENT APPROXIMATELY THIRTEEN DAYS AFTER UNDERGOING A PROCEDURE WHICH INCLUDED USE OF TRUFREEZE CRYOSPRAY THERAPY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATIENT SOUGHT AND RECEIVED ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION (ANTIBIOTICS, STENT).
Patient problems: Perforation
MAUDE report 17021843 ↗
Other UNIT, CRYOSURGICAL, ACCESSORIES devices
- IceFORCE® 2.1 CX 90° Cryoablation Needle FPRPR3602Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories2 recalls4 deaths274 reports
- IceRod® 1.5 CX 90° Cryoablation Needle FPRPR3533Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories1 recall168 reports
- IcePearl® 2.1 CX 90° Cryoablation Needle FPRPR3601Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories2 recalls78 reports
- IceFORCE™ 2.1 CX L 90° Cryoablation Needle FPRPR3618Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories2 recalls6 reports
- IceFORCE® 2.1 CX Cryoablation Needle FPRPR3604Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories2 recalls3 reports
- IcePearl™ 2.1 CX L 90° Cryoablation Needle FPRPR3617Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories2 recalls1 report
- Three IceFORCE ® 2.1 CX Prostate Cryoablation Kit Visual-ICE® System FPRPR3607Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories2 recalls0 reports
- Three IcePearl® 2.1 CX Prostate Cryoablation KitVisual-ICE® System FPRPR3608Boston Scientific Corporation · Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page