Skip to content

MIDAS REX MR8 MR8-14BA20DRecalls & reported problems

Medtronic Powered Surgical Solutions · TOOL MR8-14BA20D MR8 14CM BALL DMD 2MM · Class 2

All models of MIDAS REX MR8 (137)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000490232), received between Sep 10, 2024 and May 8, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 2 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture5

Patient problems

  • Unintended Radiation Exposure4
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 8, 2026Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE FOR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS, THE NEUROSURGEON WAS USING A DRILL TO CREATE PEDICLE HOLES WHEN ONE DRILL BIT FRACTURED, FOLLOWED BY FRACTURE OF THE SECOND DRILL BIT. THE PROXIMAL FRAGMENTS OF BOTH DRILL BITS WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS A DELAY IN TREATMENT OF 20 MINS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS ALIVE - NO INJURY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED STATING THAT, BURR FRACTURED IN A CLEAN AND WELL-DEFINED MANNER, AND ALL BROKEN PARTS WERE IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFIED AND RETRIEVED DURING THE PROCEDURE. AN INTRAOPERATIVE O-ARM SCAN WAS PERFORMED AT THE END OF THE INTERVENTION AS A FINAL CHECK BEFORE CLOSING THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES WERE REQUIRED TO RETRIEVE BROKEN PARTS, AS ALL FRAGMENTS WERE RECOVERED PROMPTLY, AND THE FINAL IMAGING CONFIRMED COMPLETE REMOVAL. THE PATIENT IS DOING WELL AND DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY CONSEQUENCES AS A RESULT OF THE BURR BREAKAGE. ALL FRAGMENTS OF THE BROKEN BURRS WERE IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFIED AND REMOVED DURING THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Unintended Radiation Exposure

    MAUDE report 25126870 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 18, 2026Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE FOR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS, THE NEUROSURGEON WAS USING A DRILL TO CREATE PEDICLE HOLES WHEN ONE DRILL BIT FRACTURED, FOLLOWED BY FRACTURE OF THE SECOND DRILL BIT. THE PROXIMAL FRAGMENTS OF BOTH DRILL BITS WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS A DELAY IN TREATMENT OF 20 MINS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS ALIVE - NO INJURY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED STATING THAT, BURR FRACTURED IN A CLEAN AND WELL-DEFINED MANNER, AND ALL BROKEN PARTS WERE IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFIED AND RETRIEVED DURING THE PROCEDURE. AN INTRAOPERATIVE O-ARM SCAN WAS PERFORMED AT THE END OF THE INTERVENTION AS A FINAL CHECK BEFORE CLOSING THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES WERE REQUIRED TO RETRIEVE BROKEN PARTS, AS ALL FRAGMENTS WERE RECOVERED PROMPTLY, AND THE FINAL IMAGING CONFIRMED COMPLETE REMOVAL.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Unintended Radiation Exposure

    MAUDE report 24375097 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 18, 2026Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE FOR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS, THE NEUROSURGEON WAS USING A DRILL TO CREATE PEDICLE HOLES WHEN ONE DRILL BIT FRACTURED, FOLLOWED BY FRACTURE OF THE SECOND DRILL BIT. THE PROXIMAL FRAGMENTS OF BOTH DRILL BITS WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS A DELAY IN TREATMENT OF 20 MINS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS ALIVE - NO INJURY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED STATING THAT, BURR FRACTURED IN A CLEAN AND WELL-DEFINED MANNER, AND ALL BROKEN PARTS WERE IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFIED AND RETRIEVED DURING THE PROCEDURE. AN INTRAOPERATIVE O-ARM SCAN WAS PERFORMED AT THE END OF THE INTERVENTION AS A FINAL CHECK BEFORE CLOSING THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES WERE REQUIRED TO RETRIEVE BROKEN PARTS, AS ALL FRAGMENTS WERE RECOVERED PROMPTLY, AND THE FINAL IMAGING CONFIRMED COMPLETE REMOVAL.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Unintended Radiation Exposure

    MAUDE report 24375089 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 19, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE LISTHESIS SURGERY, THE NEUROSURGEON WAS MAKING THE HOLE FOR SCREW INSERTION WHEN THE FINAL PART OF THE BURR (2 MM BALL) BROKEN IN THE PATIENT'S PEDICLE. THERE WAS INTERVENTION PERFORMED DURING THAT NEUROSURGEON HAS REMOVED THE FINAL PART OF THE BROKEN BURR (THE 2 MM BALL) FROM THE PEDICLE OF THE PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY AND THE PROCEDURE WAS EXTENDED FOR 20 MINUTES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH BACKUP PRODUCT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20256467 ↗
  • InjurySep 10, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE OF AN EXPANSIVE INTRACANAL EXTRADURAL DORSOL D2-D6 LESION THE TOOL BROKEN AND THE BALL WHICH BLEW OFF THE STEM REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY. ON (B)(6) 2024 THE FRAGMENT OF BROKEN TOOL WAS INTERCEPTED BY MRI CONTROL DURING THE POST-OP. IT WAS NECESSARY TO PROCEED WITH A RE-INTERVENTION OF THE PATIENT TO REMOVE THE FRAGMENTS FROM PATIENT BODY ON (B)(6) 2024. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE REPORTED PRODUCT, BROKEN PIECES RETRIEVED FROM PATIENT'S BODY AND THE TOOL WAS DISCARDED. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY.

    Patient problems: Unintended Radiation Exposure

    MAUDE report 20180812 ↗

Other DRILLS, BURRS, TREPHINES & ACCESSORIES (SIMPLE, POWERED) devices

All DRILLS, BURRS, TREPHINES & ACCESSORIES (SIMPLE, POWERED) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page