Skip to content

MIDAS REX MR8 MR8-9BA40Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Powered Surgical Solutions · TOOL MR8-9BA40 MR8 9CM BALL 4MM · Class 2

All models of MIDAS REX MR8 (137)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00763000506391), received between Sep 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 30, 2026Fracture; No Apparent Adverse Event

    It was reported that prior to use, during the initial test performed in the surgery, the attachment malfunctioned, causing the burr to fracture. An intervention was performed and the procedure was completed with backup products, with another attachment and burr used as replacement materials to perform the surgery. At the time of the report, the patient was alive with no injuries.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50944349 ↗

Other DRILLS, BURRS, TREPHINES & ACCESSORIES (SIMPLE, POWERED) devices

All DRILLS, BURRS, TREPHINES & ACCESSORIES (SIMPLE, POWERED) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page