Sentrant™ SENSH1628W (UDI 00763000716417)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · SENTRANT INTRODUCER SHEATH 16 FR X 28 CM · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00763000716417), received between Jan 26, 2026 and Jan 26, 2026 — classified as 1 injury.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- Perforation of Vessels1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 26, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AN ETBF2813C124EJ STENT GRAFT WAS IMPLANTED DURING THE ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A 63MM AAA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD BARE-METAL STENTS PLACED FROM BOTH CIAS TO THE EIAS, WITH THE EIA OCCLUDED. ALTHOUGH STENOSIS WAS OBSERVED IN THE LEFT ACCESS, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT EVAR COULD PROCEED IF PTA WAS PERFORMED FIRST. AFTER APPLYING A 6MM PTA BALLOON TO THE LEFT ACCESS, AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO ADVANCE THE ETBF2813C124EJ FROM THE RIGHT ACCESS, BUT IT GOT STUCK AROUND THE CIA AND WAS DIFFICULT TO ADVANCE. IT WAS EVENTUALLY ADVANCED, AND THE MAIN BODY WAS DEPLOYED. AN NON-MEDTRONIC LIMB WAS PLACED ON THE CONTRALATERAL SIDE, DEPLOYED UP TO THE MAIN BODY ON THE IPSILATERAL SIDE, AND THEN REMOVED. DURING REMOVAL, ACCESS DAMAGE WAS A CONCERN, SO BLOOD PRESSURE WAS MONITORED. ALTHOUGH IT DROPPED SLIGHTLY, THE REPLACEMENT OF A SENTRANT SHEATH MADE IT UNCLEAR WHETHER DAMAGE HAD OCCURRED. AN NON-MEDTRONIC LIMB WAS PLACED ON THE IPSILATERAL DISTAL SIDE AND A TOUCH-UP WAS PERFORMED. FINAL ANGIOGRAPHY CONFIRMED THE ABSENCE OF ANY ENDOLEAK. A NON-MEDTRONIC SHEATH WAS INSERTED INTO THE LEFT FA WAS LOWERED TO THE FEMORAL HEAD AREA, AND ANGIOGRAPHY REVEALED A LOCALIZ
Patient problems: Perforation of Vessels
MAUDE report 24176301 ↗
Other Introducer, catheter devices
- VIZIGO D138502Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls4 deaths2,839 reports
- VIZIGO D138501Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls2 deaths2,005 reports
- Swartz™ 407451St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER5 deaths728 reports
- Edwards eSheath+ Introducer set 914ESPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Introducer, Catheter22 deaths532 reports
- Fast-Cath™ 406849St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER420 reports
- VIZIGO D138503Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER362 reports
- Agilis™ G408318St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER333 reports
- Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™ SI-1371-MSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Introducer, catheter1 death301 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page