Peel-Apart Percutaneous Introducer Kit 0607780Recalls & reported problems
Bard Access Systems, Inc. · 8 Fr. PTFE Peel-Apart Percutaneous Introducer Kit · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741038358), received between Apr 8, 2016 and Feb 26, 2026 — classified as 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Advance2
- Fracture2
- Physical Resistance/Sticking2
- Air/Gas in Device1
- Bent1
- Defective Component1
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 26, 2026Fracture; Air/Gas in Device
A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PORT CATHETER REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE USING THE PTFE PEEL APART INTRODUCER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, AIR ALLEGEDLY LEAKED AND WAS UNABLE TO REPLENISH BLOOD. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24465774 ↗MalfunctionJul 21, 2025Unsealed Device Packaging; Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Material Integrity Problem; Unsealed Device Packaging; Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Material Integrity Problem
A PATIENT WAS PREPPED FOR A PORT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE AND IT WAS FOUND THAT THE PTFE PEEL-APART PERCUTANEOUS INTRODUCER KIT ALLEGEDLY DAMAGED UPON DELIVERY. FURTHER IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS OIL LOOKING STAIN ON PACKAGE WHICH WAS CLEARLY A CONTAMINATION. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22552912 ↗MalfunctionApr 15, 2024Fracture; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Fracture; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CHRONIC CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE MID SHEATH WAS ALLEGEDLY FRACTURED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19109829 ↗MalfunctionDec 2, 2021Failure to Advance; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Failure to Advance; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PORT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE SHEATH WAS ALLEGEDLY ABNORMALLY TIGHT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CARD WAS NOT TIGHT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12916548 ↗MalfunctionDec 2, 2021Failure to Advance; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Failure to Advance; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PORT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE SHEATH WAS ALLEGEDLY ABNORMALLY TIGHT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CARD WAS NOT TIGHT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12916501 ↗MalfunctionApr 19, 2019Material Frayed; Defective Component; Material Frayed; Defective Component
THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES ONE (1) MALFUNCTION EVENT. A REVIEW OF THE EVENT INDICATED THAT MODEL 0607780 IMPLANTABLE PORT EXPERIENCED A DEFECTIVE COMPONENT. THIS EVENT WAS REPORTED FROM A SINGLE SOURCE. THIS EVENT INVOLVED A PATIENT WITH NO REPORTED INJURY. THE PATIENT¿S AGE, WEIGHT, AND SEX WERE NOT PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8532597 ↗MalfunctionAug 11, 2016Bent
REPORTED THE END OF THE NEEDLE WAS BENT. USED A NEW DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. ON 7/22/2016 - THE NEEDLE WAS RETURNED WITH A GUIDEWIRE LODGED INSIDE. THERE WAS NO BEND IN THE NEEDLE BUT THE GUIDEWIRE WAS BENT. THE GUIDEWIRE WAS ALSO FRAYED. THE FRAYED PORTION OF THE GUIDEWIRE WAS RETAINED WITHIN THE NEEDLE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5870289 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2016Difficult to Insert; Split
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT THERE WERE NO ANOMALIES WHEN THEY OPENED THE PACKAGE OF THE INTRODUCER KIT. THE USER INSERTED THE GUIDEWIRE IN THE PATIENT AND FOUND THAT INSERTION WAS DIFFICULT. THE USER THEN RETRACTED THE DEVICE AND FOUND THAT THE TIP OF THE GUIDEWIRE WAS SPLIT. ANOTHER KIT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5818928 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2016Device Operates Differently Than Expected
THE TIP OF THE GUIDE WIRE WAS REPORTEDLY TOO SOFT TO USE. ANOTHER ONE WAS USED TO COMPLETE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5563086 ↗
Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices
- VIZIGO D138502Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls4 deaths2,839 reports
- VIZIGO D138501Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls2 deaths2,005 reports
- Swartz™ 407451St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER5 deaths728 reports
- Edwards eSheath+ Introducer set 914ESPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Introducer, Catheter22 deaths532 reports
- Fast-Cath™ 406849St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER420 reports
- VIZIGO D138503Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER362 reports
- Agilis™ G408318St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER333 reports
- Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™ SI-1371-MSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Introducer, catheter1 death301 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page