Skip to content

MicroEZ Introducer 0678950Recalls & reported problems

Bard Access Systems, Inc. · 5.0 Fr. Universal, · Class 2

All models of MicroEZ Introducer (12)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741038389), received between Apr 1, 2016 and Nov 8, 2024 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Frayed” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Frayed2
  • Physical Resistance2
  • Coiled1
  • Defective Component1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Material Integrity Problem1
  • Unraveled Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 8, 2024Material Frayed; Material Frayed

    IT WAS REPORTED BY CUSTOMER THAT CUSTOMER PULLED WIRE OUT AND IT PROCEEDED TO UNRAVEL. HAD TO GET A NEW WIRE. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20646088 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 25, 2024Defective Component; Defective Component

    IT WAS REPORTED BY CUSTOMER THAT WE THEN OBTAINED WIRE, THIS TIME FROM A 5F LOT # REHS1567. THIS WIRE WAS INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT WITHOUT DIFFICULTY, BUT, AFTER REMOVING IT, WE REALIZED THERE WAS A SMALL BALL OF WIRE ON THE END. IT WAS SMOOTH AND ROUND SO IT DID NOT CAUSE ANY HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19182144 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 2, 2023Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER ¿I WAS DOING A PICC LINE TODAY AND IN THE MICROEZ MICROINTRODUCER KIT, THE END OF THE GUIDEWIRE WAS BENT AND GOT CAUGHT ON THE END OF THE NEEDLE WHEN TRYING TO EXTRACT IT. THANKFULLY I WAS TRYING TO DO SO AFTER THE WIRE AND NEEDLE HAD BEEN PULLED OUT OF THE PATIENT¿S ARM.¿ NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17052874 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2021Material Frayed; Material Frayed

    IT WAS REPORTED "CUSTOMER CALLED IN AND STATED THAT THIS WAS IN REGARDS A GUIDE WIRE THAT SHEERED BROKE." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED 09/22/2021: IT WAS REPORTED THIS PRODUCT WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED ON A PATIENT, HOWEVER, IT SHEARED AFTER BEING PULLED FROM THE PATIENT AFTER MEETING RESISTANCE DURING PLACEMENT. NO HARM TO THE PATIENT WAS DONE. THE STAT LOCK DEVICES ARE USED AFTER PLACEMENT FOR SECUREMENT, HOWEVER, AS STATED BEFORE THE WIRE WAS REMOVED DUE TO RESISTANCE MET DURING PLACEMENT. AFTER INSERTING WIRE THROUGH NEEDLE, WIRE BECAME STUCK. UNABLE TO ADVANCE OR RETRACT. REMOVED WIRE AND NEEDLE FROM PATIENT, PULLED VERY HARD ON WIRE AND WIRE SHEARED. NO PATIENT HARM OCCURRED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12541833 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 23, 2017Material Integrity Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2017- PER SALES REP, THE FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE MICROINTRODUCER DID NOT COMPLETELY PEEL AWAY AND A SMALL PORTION WAS LEFT AROUND THE PICC. IT WAS STATED THAT THE USER HAD TO REMOVE THE REMAINING SIDE OF THE MICROINTRODUCER BY PULLING IT AWAY FROM AROUND THE PICC WITH A HEMOSTAT.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 6353307 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 20, 2016Unraveled Material; Physical Resistance; Difficult to Advance

    ON 09/27/2016- PER MEDWATCH, THE FACILITY REPORTED "ATTEMPTED TO PLACE PICC IN RIGHT BASILICA VEIN, OBTAINED ACCESS BUT UNABLE TO THREAD WIRE. WHILE REMOVING WIRE, RESISTANCE WAS MET. UPON TOTAL REMOVAL OF WIRE, NOTED TO HAVE UNRAVELED AND COPPER TIP VISUALIZED. ORDER FOR RIGHT ARM X-RAY OBTAINED." NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6045415 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 1, 2016Coiled; Physical Resistance

    ON (B)(4) 2016 - AS REPORTED BY SALES REPRESENTATIVE, A GUIDEWIRE BECAME "FULLY COILED." THE FACILITY ALLEGED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE FOR THE PICC HAD A SMALL BUMP AT THE DISTAL TIP OF THE GUIDEWIRE TWO INCHES FROM THE END WHERE THE INTRODUCER IS PLACED. ON (B)(4) 2016 - AS REPORTED BY COMPLAINANT - ATTEMPTED TO PULL GUIDEWIRE THROUGH THE NEEDLE, MET RESISTANCE, AND THEN PULLED THE NEEDLE AND GUIDEWIRE OUT TOGETHER. THEY STATED THAT THE WIRE CAME OUT COILED. PRESSURE HELD AT BEDSIDE, AND DOCTOR WAS CALLED TO ASSESS. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 5542653 ↗

Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices

All INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page