Skip to content

Bard® Hydro-Glide™ Guidewire 145FS38Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bard® Hydro-Glide™ Guidewire · Class 1

All models of Bard Hydro-Glide Guidewire (3)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741053269), received between Sep 5, 2023 and Dec 23, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient Device Interaction Problem2
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Flaked1
  • Material Fragmentation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 23, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE WAS TORN.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21000087 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 20, 2024Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT UNIDENTIFIED WHITE POWDERS KEPT FALLING FROM THE GUIDEWIRE WHILE MOVING FORTH AND BACK. PER FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA IBC ON 07NOV2024, CUSTOMER CONFIRMED THAT THERE WAS NO DIRECT IMPACT ON THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20733598 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2024Flaked; Flaked

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT HYDROPHILIC FILM COATING CAME OFF IN THE PATIENT. ALMOST LIKE A SNAKESKIN. THEY OPENED ANOTHER WIRE. PER FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 10APR2024, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 29 WIRES PULLED OFF THE SHELF AFTER THE INCIDENT WITH THE REPORTED WIRE THAT WAS FLAKING. THAT PARTICULAR WIRE WAS DISCARDED. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED. CUSTOMER HAS THE REMAINING 29 THAT WILL BE SENT IN FOR SAMPLE. PER SAMPLE RECEIVED ON 30APR2024, THE CUSTOMER RETURNED SIX ADDITIONAL LOT NUMBERS FOR (BATCH#GFHW0335), (BATCH#GFHV2176, (BATCH#GFHX1239), (BATCH# GFHX1243), (BATCH#GFGR2107) AND (BATCH#GFGR2531).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19132813 ↗
  • InjurySep 5, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    CRITICAL CARE NURSES REPORTED IN AN ONLINE SURVEY STATED NO, THE GUIDEWIRE WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN PROVIDING TRANSURETHRAL OR PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS INTO THE BLADDER, URETER AND RENAL PELVIS BECAUSE COMPLETE OBLITERATION OF URETHRAL LUMEN IN RELATION TO GUIDEWIRE, HYDROGLIDE¿, FLEXIBLE STRAIGHT TIP, FIXED CORE, STANDARD TAPER, HYDROPHILIC, 145CM LONG, .038, STERILE. MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS UNKNOWN. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA EMAIL ON 23AUG2023, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURVEY RESPONDENT STATED THAT NO, THE GUIDEWIRE WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN PROVIDING TRANSURETHRAL ACCESS INTO THE BLADDER BECAUSE COMPLETE OBLITERATION OF URETHRAL LUMEN IN RELATION TO 145FS38 - GUIDEWIRE, HYDROGLIDE¿, FLEXIBLE STRAIGHT TIP, FIXED CORE, STANDARD TAPER, HYDROPHILIC, 145CM LONG, .038, STERILE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 17682096 ↗
  • InjurySep 5, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    CRITICAL CARE NURSES REPORTED THAT NO, THE GUIDEWIRE WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN PROVIDING TRANSURETHRAL/PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS INTO THE BLADDER/URETER/RENAL PELVIS BECAUSE COMPLETE OBLITERATION OF URETHRAL LUMEN IN RELATION TO 145FS38 - GUIDEWIRE HYDROGLIDE FLEXIBLE STRAIGHT TIP FIXED CORE STANDARD TAPER HYDROPHILIC 145CM LONG .038 STERILE. MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 17682095 ↗

Other STYLET FOR CATHETER, GASTRO-UROLOGY devices

All STYLET FOR CATHETER, GASTRO-UROLOGY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page