Skip to content

MicroEZ Introducer 0928945Recalls & reported problems

Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Univ MI, 4.5 Fr, 7cm, · Class 2

All models of MicroEZ Introducer (12)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741074691), received between Feb 26, 2025 and May 5, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Frayed” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Frayed2
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 5, 2026Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED INTRODUCER HAD A BURR OF PLASTIC ON THE END AND WASN'T USEABLE. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE TRAUMATIC ATTEMPTS WHEN TRYING TO PUSH THE INTRODUCER DILATOR THROUGH SKIN AND WHEN IT WOULDN'T IT WAS REMOVED OVER WIRE AND INSPECTED FURTHER AND THAT'S WHEN THE PLASTIC BURR WAS SEEN ON IT PEEL AWAY PART OF THE DILATOR. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25086655 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 5, 2025Material Frayed; Material Frayed

    IT WAS REPORTED PER MEDWATCH THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE GUIDEWIRE, THE WIRE BECAME STUCK. AFTER ANOTHER ATTEMPT, THE WIRE SPIRALED APART AND LENGTHENED SIGNIFICANTLY BUT WAS STILL STUCK IN PATIENT'S ARM. USING FORCE WITH THE WIRE, IT STILL UNCOILED AND WAS EVENTUALLY REMOVED WITH THE INTRODUCER. STANDARD WIRE LENGTH IS 50CM, THE UNCOILED WIRE LENGTH MEASURED 85CM. MEDICATIONS AND TESTS WERE DELAYED. NO SERIOUS INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21527946 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2025Material Frayed; Material Frayed

    IT WAS REPORTED WE HAD A GUIDE WIRE UNRAVEL IN A PATIENT. THE METAL TIP ZIG ZAG WIRE BECAME STUCK IN THE PATIENT NEEDED TO BE REMOVED WITH FORCE. PATIENT UPSET, REQUIRED XRAY TO CONFIRM NO WIRE RETAINED. PICC INSERTION ABORTED AND PATIENT REFUSED ANOTHER ATTEMPT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21471469 ↗

Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices

All INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page