Skip to content

Proxis™ Ureteral Access Sheath 231245Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · Proxis™ Ureteral Access Sheath · Class 2

All models of Proxis Ureteral Access Sheath (9)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741101724), received between Oct 2, 2018 and Mar 21, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Flaked” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Flaked3
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Break1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device Damaged Prior to Use1
  • Material Integrity Problem1
  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • Injury1
  • No Patient Involvement1
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 21, 2026Flaked; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER REMOVING THE DILATOR, THE SHEATH WAS PEELING LIKE A SPLINTER ON THE INSIDE OF THE SHEATH TIP, END POINT. PER FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA RCC ON 19MAR2026, STATED THAT RATHER THAN COMPLETE DETACHMENT, IT APPEARS TO BE A FRAYING OR SPLITTING CONDITION, THOUGH THE EXACT NATURE WAS UNCLEAR AND ITS USE WAS DISCONTINUED IMMEDIATELY UPON NOTICING THE ISSUE, SO THERE WERE NO RESIDUAL FRAGMENTS LEFT IN THE BODY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24656979 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 7, 2023Flaked; Flaked

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INSIDE LINER OF PROXIS STARTED TO SHRED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16317278 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2021Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Scratched Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Scratched Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSY (TUL) IMPLEMENTATION CONFIRMED THAT THE LUMEN WAS SEEN LINT-LIKE UPON BLADDER STONE RETRIEVAL. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA IBC ON 31JAN2021, THE FIBERS LIKE THREAD WERE ALLEGEDLY OBSERVED IN THE LUMEN.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 11301620 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 26, 2021Flaked; Flaked

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A URETHRAL CATHETER SHEATH WAS INSERTED TO ESTABLISH ACCESS, WHEN PERFORMING LITHOTRIPSY UNDER FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPE. IT WAS STATED THAT AFTER THE FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPE WAS INSERTED, MATERIALS ON THE INNER WALL OF THE SHEATH CAME OFF.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 11229323 ↗
  • InjuryDec 9, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Positioning Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ACCESS SHEATH WAS NOT ABLE TO MOVE SMOOTHLY DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE USER REMOVED THE DEVICE TO FIND THE PATIENT HAD URETHRAL MUCOSAL DAMAGE. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE IBC VIA EMAIL 25NOV2019, IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE PATIENT REQUIRED ANY FURTHER MEDICAL INTERVENTION, AND IT IS UNKNOWN THE CONDITION OF THE ACCESS SHEATH BEFORE THE PROCEDURE OCCURRED (WAS THE SHEATH SMOOTH, ROUGH, ETC.).

    Patient problems: Injury; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 9440115 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 11, 2019Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A LONG HAIR INSIDE OF THE SHEATH UPON OPENING THE PACKAGING.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9305412 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 10, 2019Device Damaged Prior to Use; Material Integrity Problem; Device Damaged Prior to Use

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A BURR ON THE INNER CEASE. WHEN THE USER FOUND IT, THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED AND NO ADDITIONAL DEVICE WAS USED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8233339 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 9, 2018Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE EXTRACTING STONE THROUGH THE SHEATH, THE LINING ON THE INNER SHEATH SCRAPED AND A THIN STRAND FELL OFF INTO THE RENAL PELVIS. THIS PIECE WAS REMOVED BY THE STONE BASKET WITH NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8056929 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 2, 2018Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE URETERAL ACCESS SHEATH CAME APART WHILE INSIDE OF THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7926652 ↗

Other endoscopic access overtube, gastroenterology-urology devices

All endoscopic access overtube, gastroenterology-urology devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page