Venovo® VENUL14140Recalls & reported problems
Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Venovo® Venous Stent System 14 mm x 140 mm (120 cm delivery catheter) · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Venovo (84)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 18
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 18 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741103537), received between Nov 13, 2019 and May 6, 2021 — classified as 18 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (17 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Recalls naming this device
- Dec 14, 2020Class IIOpen, Classified
Reports of the proximal end of the stent not immediately expanding upon deployment and remaining connected to the delivery system.
Z-1899-2021 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Activation Failure17
- Misfire2
- Break1
- Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Entrapment of Device1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions17
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 18 most recent of 18 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 6, 2021Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO EXPAND. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11782757 ↗MalfunctionApr 1, 2021Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE DISTAL PORTION OF STENT DID NOT DEPLOY. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT AFTER 3 MINUTES STENT FULLY DEPLOYED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11600928 ↗MalfunctionMar 29, 2021Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT THROUGH COMMON FEMORAL VEIN, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO EXPAND. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11580640 ↗MalfunctionMar 3, 2021Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT IN THE LEFT ILIAC VEIN VIA BILATERAL FEMORAL APPROACH, THE PART OF THE STENT ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO EXPAND. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE USER HAVE TWISTED THE CATHETER SYSTEM TO FINALLY EXPAND THE STENT. THE ALLEGED EXPANSION FAILURE LED TO A PROLONGED PROCEDURE; HOWEVER, THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11404139 ↗MalfunctionMar 2, 2021Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENT DEPLOYMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT DISTAL END ALLEGEDLY HAD DIFFICULTY TO DEPLOY. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT STENT WAS STUCK WITH DELIVERY SYSTEM AND RELEASED AFTER FEW MINUTES. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11397605 ↗MalfunctionFeb 16, 2021Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT THROUGH RIGHT POPLITEAL VEIN, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO EXPAND. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11330972 ↗MalfunctionJan 13, 2021Break; Activation Failure; Break; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO EXPAND. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11160175 ↗MalfunctionDec 29, 2020Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO EXPAND. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11086660 ↗MalfunctionDec 29, 2020Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY CRIMPED AT THE END OF THE STENT AND WAS STILL ADHERED TO THE CATHETER. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE STENT WAS RELEASED AFTER 15-20 SECONDS AND DEPLOYED AS NORMAL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11085935 ↗MalfunctionDec 17, 2020Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Activation Failure; Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE THROUGH RIGHT COMMON ILIAC VEIN, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY HAD DIFFICULTY TO DEPLOY AND FAILED TO EXPAND IN THE DISTAL PORTION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11026734 ↗MalfunctionDec 17, 2020Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE IN THE ILIAC VEIN, THE STENT END DID NOT CORRECTLY EXPAND DURING DEPLOYMENT. THE STENT FINALLY DEPLOYED BY TWISTING THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11026645 ↗MalfunctionDec 14, 2020Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO EXPAND. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11002293 ↗MalfunctionDec 10, 2020Entrapment of Device; Activation Failure; Entrapment of Device; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY STUCK TO DELIVERY SYSTEM. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT AFTER SHAKING AND TWISTING CATHETER THE STENT FINALLY DEPLOYED BUT ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO EXPAND. REPORTEDLY, THE GUIDEWIRE ALLEGEDLY GOT STUCK TO THE STENT STRUT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH EXPANSION OF THE STRUT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10981448 ↗MalfunctionDec 7, 2020Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BILATERAL STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE IN THE ILIAC VEINS, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY DID NOT OPEN IN ONE AREA AFTER THE STENT SHEATH HAD BEEN RETRACTED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10957517 ↗MalfunctionNov 25, 2020Misfire; Activation Failure; Misfire; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TREATMENT, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY HAD A PARTIAL DEPLOYMENT INSIDE THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING SAME DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10902142 ↗MalfunctionNov 20, 2020Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS GETTING CAUGHT ON THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10874371 ↗MalfunctionNov 19, 2020Difficult to Remove; Misfire; Activation Failure; Difficult to Remove; Misfire; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT IN THE ILIOFEMORAL VEINS THROUGH POPLITEAL ACCESS, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY DEPLOYED PARTIALLY AND DIFFICULT TO REMOVE AS IT WAS STUCK TO THE STENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10865861 ↗MalfunctionNov 13, 2019Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TREATMENT OF THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC AND LEFT EXTERNAL ILIAC VEIN VIA GREAT SAPHENOUS VEIN, AFTER THE STENT HAD BEGUN TO DEPLOY, THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) REALIZED THAT THE STENT SHOULD BE PLACED LOWER AND ATTEMPTED TO MOVE THE STENT TO THE DESIRED LOCATION; HOWEVER, THE MOVEMENT CAUSED THE STENT TO ALLEGEDLY FRACTURE INTO TWO SEGMENTS. THEREFORE, THE STENT WAS COMPLETELY DEPLOYED IN THE EXTERNAL ILIAC AND COMMON FEMORAL VEIN. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT A PTA BALLOON AND AN ADDITIONAL STENT OF A DIFFERENT SIZE WERE USED TO COVER THE ENTIRETY OF THE LESION, COMPLETING THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9317452 ↗
Other Stent, iliac vein devices
- Abre™ AB9U14080090Medtronic, Inc. · Stent, iliac vein2 recalls9 reports
- Venovo® VENUM16100Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall55 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14080Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall36 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14120Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall33 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14140Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall31 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14100Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall30 reports
- Venovo® VENUM16120Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall29 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14160Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall27 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page