Venovo® VENUM18120Recalls & reported problems
Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Venovo® Venous Stent System 18 mm x 120 mm (80 cm delivery catheter) · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Venovo (84)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741103735), received between Mar 4, 2021 and Mar 3, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (4 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Dec 14, 2020Class IIOpen, Classified
Reports of the proximal end of the stent not immediately expanding upon deployment and remaining connected to the delivery system.
Z-1897-2021 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Activation Failure4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Break1
- Entrapment of Device1
- Melted1
- Positioning Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 3, 2026Break; Positioning Failure; Melted
ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE USING THE VENOVO VENOUS STENT. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE WAS INSERTED. ONCE IT WAS TIME TO DEPLOY THE STENT, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE UNLOCK BUTTON WAS BROKEN. FURTHERMORE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BUTTON WAS UNABLE TO CLICK. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER STENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24492921 ↗MalfunctionMar 18, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOMETIME POST A STENT PLACEMENT, THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED GENERAL FATIGUE AND PAIN IN UPPER LEGS, LOWER LEGS AND TOP OF THE FEET. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18920284 ↗MalfunctionFeb 23, 2024Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE IN THE ILIAC VEIN, THE PROXIMAL END OF THE STENT ALLEGEDLY DID NOT FULLY DETACH FROM THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT EVEN AFTER ONE MINUTE, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY DID NOT RELEASE. REPORTEDLY THE PHYSICIAN ROTATED THE DEPLOYMENT HANDLE AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18765752 ↗MalfunctionJun 2, 2021Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENT DEPLOYMENT PROCEDURE, THE PROXIMAL END OF THE STENT ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO EXPAND. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT STENT WAS DEPLOYED AFTER FIVE MINUTES BY ROTATING CATHETER HANDLE IN CLOCKWISE DIRECTION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11918590 ↗MalfunctionMar 31, 2021Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENT DEPLOYMENT IN THE ILIAC VEIN THE PROXIMAL END OF THE STENT ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO OPEN. THE USER ROTATED THE HANDLE AND THE STENT EXPANDED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11594144 ↗MalfunctionMar 4, 2021Entrapment of Device; Activation Failure; Entrapment of Device; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS FAILED TO EXPAND FULLY AND WHEN THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO REMOVE THE SYSTEM FROM THE PATIENT, IT WAS STUCK AT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE STENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11410797 ↗
Other Stent, iliac vein devices
- Abre™ AB9U14080090Medtronic, Inc. · Stent, iliac vein2 recalls9 reports
- Venovo® VENUM16100Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall55 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14080Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall36 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14120Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall33 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14140Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall31 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14100Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall30 reports
- Venovo® VENUM16120Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall29 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14160Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall27 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page