Skip to content

Venovo® VENUL18120Recalls & reported problems

Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Venovo® Venous Stent System 18 mm x 120 mm (120 cm delivery catheter) · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Venovo (84)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741103803), received between Nov 5, 2020 and Mar 24, 2021 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (3 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Dec 14, 2020Class IIOpen, Classified

    Reports of the proximal end of the stent not immediately expanding upon deployment and remaining connected to the delivery system.

    Z-1897-2021 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Failure3
  • Entrapment of Device2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 24, 2021Entrapment of Device; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Activation Failure; Entrapment of Device; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Activation Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO EXPAND. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS STUCK ON THE WIRE AND THE SHEATH WAS DAMAGED AT THE TIP. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11559140 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 24, 2020Activation Failure; Activation Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS GETTING CAUGHT ON THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10893387 ↗
  • InjuryNov 5, 2020Entrapment of Device; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Activation Failure; Entrapment of Device; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Activation Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENT PLACEMENT THROUGH ILIAC VEIN, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY DID NOT DEPLOY CORRECTLY. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE STENT ALLEGEDLY STUCK IN THE ILIAC VEIN. REPORTEDLY MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED TO REMOVE THE STENT. THE PATIENT CURRENT STATUS WAS NORMAL.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 10789779 ↗

Other Stent, iliac vein devices

All Stent, iliac vein devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page