Skip to content

Midline Catheter Kit P4255108DRecalls & reported problems

Bard Access Systems, Inc. · 5Fr DL PowerMidline catheter Max Kit · Class 2

All models of Midline Catheter Kit (31)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741129360), received between Jan 3, 2024 and Mar 7, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Difficult or Delayed Separation1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body Embolism1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 7, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT REQUIRED A MIDLINE IV TO BE PLACED BY A QUALIFIED INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY REGISTERED NURSE, WHICH REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN INSERTED WITH NO ISSUES. THE PATIENT¿S CONDITION DECOMPENSATED, AND SHE REQUIRED AN INTENSIVE CARE CONSULT WITH ADDITIONAL OXYGEN NEED AND VASOPRESSORS. A CT (COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY) OF THE CHEST/ABDOMEN/PELVIS WITHOUT CONTRAST WAS ORDERED. IN THE READING, THERE WAS NOTED TO BE A NEW \LINEAR METALLIC DENSITY WITHIN THE RIGHT AND LEFT PULMONARY ARTERIES, FAVORED TO REPRESENT A FOREIGN BODY SUCH AS A CATHETER OR GUIDEWIRE FRAGMENT¿. A CT PERFORMED 3 DAYS PRIOR TO THE MIDLINE INSERTION DID NOT SHOW THE FOREIGN BODY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED 03/01/2024: IT WAS REPORTED THE FOREIGN MATERIAL WAS NEVER REMOVED PRIOR TO EXPIRATION. WE CANNOT CONFIRM IT HAD AN EFFECT ON THE OUTCOME, ONLY THAT IT WAS IDENTIFIED ON IMAGING.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Embolism; Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 18856495 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 3, 2024Material Deformation; Difficult or Delayed Separation; Material Deformation; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT PICC KIT HAD DIFFICULTY TEARING AND SEPARATING. HAVING TO MANIPULATE PICC SITE LEADING TO INCREASED TOUCHES AND RISK FOR INFECTION. INABILITY TO PLACE LINE IS POSSIBLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18441132 ↗

Other Midline catheter devices

All Midline catheter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page