PowerMidline CK000756Recalls & reported problems
Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter Placement Kit · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741141126), received between May 12, 2022 and Jun 1, 2023 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fluid/Blood Leak” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fluid/Blood Leak6
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 1, 2023Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT THERE ARE LEAKING FROM INSERTION SITE ON A MIDLINE PLACED ON 4/29 AND REMOVED 5/2. LINE PLACED ON LEFT CEPHALIC. A NEW CATHETER WAS INSERTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17042573 ↗MalfunctionJun 1, 2023Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT THERE ARE LEAKING FROM INSERTION SITE ON A MIDLINE THAT WAS PLACED ON 5/2 AND REMOVED ON 5/4/2023. A NEW MIDLINE WAS PLACED. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17038400 ↗MalfunctionJun 2, 2022Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED THE MIDLINE WAS LEAKING AT THE INSERTION SITE. ADDITIONAL INFO. RECEIVED: AT WHAT POINT DURING DEVICE USE WAS THE LEAK DISCOVERED (I.E. INSERTION, INFUSION, REMOVAL)WAS THE CATHETER FRACTURE INTERNAL TO THE PATIENT OR EXTERNAL? INFUSION. WHAT WAS INFUSION WHEN THE LEAK WAS DISCOVERED? MEROPENEM. ANY PATIENT SYMPTOMS RELATED TO FLUID LEAK? NO. WAS THE CATHETER REMOVED? WAS A NEW CATHETER PLACED? YES AND YES. WHAT TYPE OF CATHETER SECUREMENT WAS UTILIZED? STATLOCK. WHAT TYPE OF CATHETER SECUREMENT WAS UTILIZED? MIDLINE. EXPLANT DATE: UNSURE DO TO PATIENT BEING OUTPATIENT AND HOME CARE WAS MANAGING LINE. WAS THERE ANY PATIENT HARM REPORTED? NO.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14584208 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2022Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED "FOUND OUT THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 3 MIDLINES FROM THE SAME LOT LEAKING AT THE INSERTION SITE. WHEN THEY PULLED THE MIDLINE AND FLUSHED, EXAMINED THEY DID NOT NOTICE ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE CATHETER BUT THEY HAVE ALSO BEEN USING THESE FOR YEARS WITH NO ISSUES. WE WENT THROUGH SEVERAL TROUBLESHOOTING TECHNIQUES WHICH WE FEEL THIS COULD BE MED OR PATIENT ANATOMY ISSUES BUT STILL WANT TO REPORT. 2 EXCHANGED AND 1 WENT TO NPO MEDS" THIS REPORT ADDRESSES THE NPO MEDS DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14388252 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2022Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED "FOUND OUT THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 3 MIDLINES FROM THE SAME LOT LEAKING AT THE INSERTION SITE. WHEN THEY PULLED THE MIDLINE AND FLUSHED, EXAMINED THEY DID NOT NOTICE ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE CATHETER BUT THEY HAVE ALSO BEEN USING THESE FOR YEARS WITH NO ISSUES. WE WENT THROUGH SEVERAL TROUBLESHOOTING TECHNIQUES WHICH WE FEEL THIS COULD BE MED OR PATIENT ANATOMY ISSUES BUT STILL WANT TO REPORT. 2 EXCHANGED AND 1 WENT TO NPO MEDS" THIS REPORT ADDRESSES THE SECOND EXCHANGED MIDLINE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14388248 ↗MalfunctionMay 12, 2022Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED "FOUND OUT THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 3 MIDLINES FROM THE SAME LOT LEAKING AT THE INSERTION SITE. WHEN THEY PULLED THE MIDLINE AND FLUSHED, EXAMINED THEY DID NOT NOTICE ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE CATHETER BUT THEY HAVE ALSO BEEN USING THESE FOR YEARS WITH NO ISSUES. WE WENT THROUGH SEVERAL TROUBLESHOOTING TECHNIQUES WHICH WE FEEL THIS COULD BE MED OR PATIENT ANATOMY ISSUES BUT STILL WANT TO REPORT. 2 EXCHANGED AND 1 WENT TO NPO MEDS" THIS REPORT ADDRESSES THE FIRST EXCHANGED MIDLINE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14383943 ↗
Other Midline catheter devices
- Midline Catheter Kit P4154108DBard Access Systems, Inc. · Midline catheter1 recall1 death126 reports
- ARROW IPN921959Teleflex Incorporated · Midline catheter2 recalls0 reports
- Midline Catheter Kit S4153108BDPBard Access Systems, Inc. · Midline catheter1 recall36 reports
- Midline Catheter Kit S4153108DBard Access Systems, Inc. · Midline catheter1 recall32 reports
- Midline Catheter Kit S4153108DGPBard Access Systems, Inc. · Midline catheter1 recall15 reports
- Midline Catheter Kit S4254108BDPBard Access Systems, Inc. · Midline catheter1 recall11 reports
- Midline Catheter Kit P4154108Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Midline catheter1 recall10 reports
- ARROW IPN037698Teleflex Incorporated · Midline catheter1 recall9 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page